72 | AustrAliAn triAthlete
hoT
STUff
I think the finger can be pointed
three ways -
- Lack of plain language communication
by scientists. - Coaches are busily writing programs for
too many athletes to keep up with
current best practice. - Athletes who too often focus on the
latest and greatest equipment, rather
than the critical skills associated with
swim/bike/run.
W
hen it comes to adapting
for racing in the heat, I feel
like a stuck record.
It’s low hanging fruit: at
least a three percent improvement on race
day if you can acclimate effectively in the
two weeks leading into your event.
The science has been published over and
over. From the seminal work of Greenleaf
et al. in the 70s to Armstrong and Maresh
(1991), heat acclimatisation has been
widely studied and accepted in the
physiology world.
Since we already know that heat
acclimation improves performance
(summarised well in Guy et al. 2014),
there’s a great deal of interest in how to
optimise benefit to time spent on
acclimation - especially in a world where
140 characters is an essay! Short or
Medium Term Heat Acclimation (STHA or
MTHA) both work well, with the weight of
literature backing MTHA as superior. So
why aren’t athletes executing a simple
task for this performance benefit?
text by dR MItcH andeRSon
IllUStrAtIon by SHutteRStocK.coM
Now that I have clipped the whole
community (sorry!), let’s get to the nuts
and bolts of heat acclimation.
To clarify, heat acclimation benefits
racing in cool-temperate climates, as well
as hot/humid conditions. But I really want
athletes and coaches to focus on
executing MTHA or STHA protocols
effectively for racing in the heat (i.e.
Ironman Cairns or Ironman 70.3 Cairns),
rather than getting bogged down
comparing the minutiae of performance
WANT To IMProve
YoUr^ rAce DAY
PerforMANce^ BY
3%?^
Try new heat
acclimatisation
and receive a free
set of run legs!
Training TOOLBOX