8 MichelleBarker
andCristinaRocha
been
historically
limited
(Bucknell
1992).
two
chapters
inthisbook
(Bubna-Litio
and
Higgins.
and
Cousens)
attesttothe
continuing
desireforsuch
eeumenismand
demonstrate
thebenefitsofthis
Bouma
argues
that
‘migtation
hasbeenthe
major
factorin
theradical
increasing
religious diversity
inAustralia'
(2003:
59).
Indeed,
in 2006 69
per
centof
Buddhists
(288,100)
were
bornoverseas
(ABS2007),
Of
these,
nearly250,
werefromAsiancountries.It
is
noteworthy.however,
that
5,
wereborninthe
United
Kingdom.
TableI
liststhe
top
15 Asian
countriesinwhichAustralian
Buddhistswereborn.
However,
Bouma
also observesthat ‘the
recentincrease
among
Buddhists
cannot be
entirely
explained bymigration’(2003: 59).
Therehas beenarise
in
thenumberofconverts.
Thisissimilartowhat
hasbeen
occurring
inother
Western
settings,probably
duetothe
credibility
Buddhismcarri
'
intheWestand
to
thefactthatinrecent
decadesAustralianshave
become
‘sptntual‘
ratherthan
‘religious'
(Bouma
2006:
62).
Thishasbeen
accompanied
by
an
expansion
ofthe
religious
market
throughmigration,
travelandincreased
globalization.
In
Australia,
the
expansion
oftheNew
Age
movementhas
translatedintoarise
of
alternative
spiritualities(Bouma
2006:
61—3).Although
census
figures
tendto
lackthe
refinementof
in-depth
research.
they
can
provide
a
general
ideaofthe
field.For
instance,
thenumber
ofAustralians
identifying
with
nature
religions
has
increasedIn
I996theseconstituted
I0,000(0.
per
centofthe
population);
in
200Ithis
numberroseto23.
(0.
per
centofthe
population)
and,
by
2006.
hadreached
29,396 (0.
percent).
Bouma
argues
that ‘therise
of
Pagan
and
TableI
2
Birthplace
ofAustralian
Buddhists. 2006
('Dlmlrynfhir/lx Number
ofadhmm
Vietnam
93.
China(excludesSARSandTaiwan
Province) 36,
Malaysia
23,
Thailand
23,I
Cambodia
19,
Sri
Lanka
I93."
Taiwan
9.
Japan
8.
Hong
Kong
(SAR
of
China)
7,
Laos
7.2I
Indonesia
5.
Singapore
4.
Burma
(Myanmar)
4,
Korea.
RepublicoftSouth) 3.
EastTimor
2.
E
Source:
ABS2006,
Country
ofBirth
ofPersonand
Religious
Affiliation
by
Australia
Introduction 9
New
Agespiritualities
is
largely
attributableto
changes
in
religiousidentity
in
response
tothe
globalization
ofideasabout
religion'(2003:
55).
Twootherdevel-
opments
havecontributedtothis
spiritual
renewal.
First.
therehasbeenadecline
inmainlineProtestant
groups(for
instance.
Anglicans
arenow18.
per
centof
the
population,
while
theycomprised
40
per
centin
1947).Second,
thereisan
increaseinthenumberofAustralians
whoidentifyas
‘no
religion'in
thecensuSrfrom
15.
per
centin200]to18.
percent
in2006.
Giventhesethree
developments
7
an increasein
spiritualities
of
choice.
a
declineininstitutionalized
religion
andanincreaseof‘no
religion”
,
itis
highly
likely
that
increasing
numbersofAustraliansare
migrating
frominstitutionalized
religions
toamorefluid
spirituality.
Indeed,
Boumahascalledattentiontothe
factthatthenumberof
people
whose
religion
was
‘inadequately
described'has
increased 552
per
centbetweenthe 1996 and 2001 censuses
(nearly
2
per
centof
the
population).
WhenBoumoaccessed
people’s
written
responses
totheir
religion
inthe‘other‘box.hefoundthatthe‘word
spiritual
wasthemost
frequent
choice‘
(2003:
65)
According
toBouma:‘the
growth
ofmeditationand
spirituality
centres
provides
furtherevidenceofthe
change
and
regeneration
ofAustralian
religious
and
spiritual
Iifc~
(2006:162).
Thisis
supportedbyTaccy.
whofoundin 2003 that
religious
and
spiritual
revitalizationwas
occurring
inAustralia
(2003)
However,
whileAustraliansare
experimenting
with a
range
of
spiritualities,
convertsto Buddhism are not
necessarily ‘picking
and
mixing~
from diverse
religious
traditions in New
Age
fashion. Oneofthefew studies ofconvert
BuddhistsinAustraliaconcludedthattheir
approach
to
practice
wasnotNew
Age;
ratherthatconvertBuddhistsin this
study
‘Iocatedthemselveswithinadiscrete
spiritual
traditionina
relatively
stablemanner Atthecoreofthe
practice
is
disciplined
and
regular
meditation.comhincdwithdetailed
study
ofBuddhist
philosophy
asitisdocumentedinadvanced textsand
scnptures'(Phillips
and
Aarons2005:
219720).
Fitzpatrick‘sanalysis
ofTibetanBuddhist
practices
in this
volume
suggests
thatthe
meaning
oftraditional
religiouspractices
arereframed
and
reapplied
tosuit the
contemporary
needs ofAustralian individuals This
approach
issimilartothe
practices
ofotherWesternBuddhists. whoblurthe
boundariesbetweenIaici7ationandmona:'cism.
Buddhist
practice
is
changingsubtly
inother
ways,
The Australian website.
BuddhaNet,
exemplifies
the
increasing
effects oftheintemet. BuddhaNetis a
non-sectarian Buddhistinformationandeducation
network,
administered
by
the
Buddha DhatmaEducationAssociationthat
provides
onlineresourcesfrom all
Buddhisttraditions.Venerable
Pannyavaro,
thewebmasterof
BuddhaNet.
Founder
andPresidentoftheBuddhaDharmaEducationAssciationandaVice-Presidentof
theWorld
Fellowship
ofBuddhists.sees
possibilities
for
changing
the
way
Buddhism
is
taughtthrough
useofonlineresources.Venerable
Pannyavam
(2004)
suggests:
The
templeapproach
in
teaching
theDharmais
through
sermonswiththe
teacher
andthecontent
beingunchallenged.
Thenew
way
is
throughgroup
learning
viadiscussion.
OntheNetit's
through
chat
groups
wheretheteacher
ormoderator
actsasafacilitatorforan
ongoing
debateordiscussion.