30
DavidBzrbnu—LiticaridWinter:HigginsLayinsightpractitioners
andotherprogressivelaysupportersthereupon
aban-doned thecentre. Adozenlay teachers,
all membersoftherecently
formedInsightTeachers‘CircleofAustralia(ITCA).
publishedastatementontheinsight
communitywebsite,saying
thatthey
couldnolongerteachat
WBD,
giventhegenderimplications
ofthechange
and
thedemocraticdeficititrevealed.Theaffairbrought
hometomanyinsight
practitionersforthefirsttimeboththeincongruities
intheircommunionwiththe
Theravadininstitutionsthathadtrainedsomanyoftheir
teachersandtheinescapableorganizationalrequirements
oflayinsight
practice.Thisconflictoverbasic moral
valuessuddenly
lefllayinsightpractitioners
aroundSydney
withouttheiraccustomed
institutionalbaseandretreatcentre.3Afewmonthslaterthey
foundthemselves
alienatedfromtheirmostimportant
innerurbanbaseas
well,theBuddhistLibrary
andMeditation
Centre,alsobecauseoftheincongruitybetweendefactostatusasavoluntaryassociation,ontheone
hand,andanauthoritarianpowerstructure.onthe
other,It
too.hadbeenalively,
well<resourcedmeetingplace
forAsianandwesternBuddhists,
althoughhereaswell(toreferbacktoNumrich)intersectiontendedtooccur
withoutinteraction.
Nonetheless.thelibraryhadthephysical
capacity
tohostitsmany largegatherings
andintroductory
coursesonmeditation andBuddhism.aswellastheweeklysittings
ofseveral dharrnagroups,including
insight
groups.Several
ofSydney‘sinsight
teacherstaught
thereforanumberofyearsandwrotefor
itsqualitynewsletter,DharmaVision.Butitsgovernancestructureoperated
asessentially
thatofaprivate
businesswithlittletransparency,underthedirectionofitslargest
benefactor:In
mid-2005,thelatterimposed
anautocraticmanagementstyle;
theBuddhistLibrarythereupon
cameto
exemplifythewidespread
commodificationofthedharrnathat
CarretteandKing
analyse
(2005).
Feelingintimidatedanddemoralized,theentire
staffoffiveresigned
together
inSeptember
2005 Atthesame
time,thelayinsight
teachersdecidedthey
couldnolongerjustifyworking
withaninstitutionthatshowedsolittlerespectforpeople.
and theirsittinggroups
Iettwiththem.Althoughtheproblem
herewasquasi-corporate
rather
thanmonastic
authoritarianism.therefusalofnormalcivicassociationalprinciplesproduced
thesameresultofdisrupting
thepattern
of‘parallelccngregations‘.
Inthewakeofthesetwocrisesin
2005.theinstitutionalbaseslefitoalarge
numberofpractitioners(not
leastthoseinSydney)
weresparse.However,theonethatalready
existedgrewrapidlyandnewones
soonbegan
to
emerge.In2000 asmall suburbaninsight group.theBluegum
Sanghahad
begun.andhasexperiencedexponentialgrowth
since
2005.withseverallong-term
practi-tionerstakingupteaching
rolesinit.In 2004the[TCAwasformedandwithitscunent
membership
ofloinsightmeditationteachersfromSydney.
Brisbane.thcNorthem
Rivers,Perth.Adelaide.
AliceSprings
andCairns(includingtheformerPhlaKhantipalo.
now
LaurenceKhantipalo).itisthelargestgroup
oflay
BuddhistteachersinAustralia.
ButinSydney
thebig
issuewashowtoreplace
WBDas
themaininsight
retreatcentre,
especially
initsroleofinvitinginvisitingteachers.OutofaseriesofEmergence
ofreculurinsightpractice
31crisismeetings
ofWBDactivistsin
2005,aneworganization
—
SydneyInsight
Meditators(SIM)e
arosetotakeoveritsorganizational
servicestotheinsight
tradition.Inotherwords.itaimedtoinvite
local,interstateandoverseasteacherstogive
talksandleadretreatsandworkshops
aroundSydney
onasustainablescaleTheinstitutionallessonsoftheWEBcrisiswereforemostinthefounders‘minds:theirdocumentsinsistongender
inclusiveness,
progressivemodernvalues(includingonesappropriate
todemocraticassociational
lite)andasecularorien-tation.Forthesepurposes,theorganization's
foundersundertookthediscipline
ofanincorporatedvoluntary
associationunderNewSouthWaleslegislationInanimplicittributeto‘global
Buddhism’,SIMalsoconsciously
followedtheprecedent
oftheSantaFeVipassana
Sangha
innottyingitselftoanypanicttlar
teacher.
groupofteachersorapproach
topractice.
Itactsasanumbrella
organiz-ationforanumberoflayinsight
sanghas
inSydney.starting
withtheBtucgum
Sangha;
butnowforthreetimbergroups7
theTortoise
Mountain,GoldenWattleandBeachessanghas.
Atthetimeofwriting.itsretreatandcourse
offeringshave.insizeandfrequency,effectively
replaced
WBD‘searliercontributiontoinsight
practice.
Rethinkingdoctrine.reworkingpracticeTheimplications
ofthatwatershedyear,2005,
speaktotwoimportantaspects
ofnewlyemerging
variantsofdhannapractice,
Oneconcerns thenature andsourcesofspiritual
authority;bymovingaway
fromthetraditionalinstitutionalauthority
structuresofthe
Theravada,thequestion
arisesastowhatdharrnictextsshouldberegarded
asauthoritative.TheBluegumSangha's
responsehasbeentodistanceitselffromthecommentarialtraditionandinstituteasutrastudyprogram.
Animportant
shiftinemphasis
inthelatterwasateaching
tourbyStephen
andMartineBatchelorinlate 2004 andthefarmer’scriticalviewoftheTheravadincommentarialtradition andapproaches
toinsightmeditationbascd on ite
asagainst
theBuddha‘sownteaching
inthe Fallcanon.Animportant
sourceofBatchelor'sscepticism
isNanaviraThera's
midAtwentieth-centuryundergroundclassic.ClearingthePath(1987).
Thatauthorputsthematterbluntly: having
nominatedthe
veryfewPalisources7
includingthe"thaylls(themed
collectionsofsutras)e
thatcanclaimauthenticity.
headds:'[N]ootherPalibookswhatsoevershottldbetakenas
authoritative;andignorance
ofthem
(and
particularlyofthetraditional
Commentaries)maybecountedapositiveadvantage,
asleavinglesstobeunleamed'
(Nanavira1987:5).
TheBluegumSangha
choseasitsfirsttextbooksthefirstsutra-based
biography,TheLifeoftheBuddha,
byNanavira'sclosefriend.Nanamoli
(1972).Totheirsurprise,
someIong»time
insightstudents have foundthemselvesnotsimply
leaming
theartofreadingsutras,butalsoacquainting
themselveswitharadicallydifferentsenseofthefounderhimself.Religious
Buddhismhastendedtoignore
hermeneuticquestions
andhastreatedtheBuddha’steachings
asthetimelessrevelationsofatranscendent
beingwhollyremovedfromanyearthly
historical context. Inthisway.they
followanother