I[0 Patrick
Kearney
knowledges’,
first
analysed
in the
Visuddhimagga (Path
ofPurificationt.
a
fifth-century
ADteachers'manual
writtenforthemonksoftheMahaviharaol‘
Anuradhapura,
then
capital
ofSri
Lankzi.2Mahasi
Sayudaw
designed
hismethodof
insight
meditationto
guide
the
practitionerthrough
theseIonunas.
culminating
in
muggtI-[Ihala
norm.orm'bharmas
directly
encountered.‘this
experience
turnsthe
practitioner
froman
ordinaryperstin(pulhujjamz)
toa
streamcntcrer
(A‘U’flpaflnfli.
one
who.
having
enteredthestreamof
dhamia.
willnever
again
bebumin
any
ofthelower
realmsandwillattainfinal
awakening
within
sevenlifetimes
(Bodhi
2005:
373—5).
Mahasi
Sayadaw
and his
disciples mapped
the
‘progress
of
insight“by
makingprecise
recordsofthe
experiences
oftheir
studentsand
correlating
these
tothe
literarydescriptions
ofthe"lines.
Therecorded
experiences
of
many
thousandsof
practitioners
createda
phenomenological
databasethatallows
evenan
inexperienced
teachertolistentoa
practitioner‘sreportand.taking
into
accountotherfactorssuchasthe
personality
ufthe
practitioner
andherlevelof
concentration
(samadhi'),
localeher
precisely
withina
specific
norm. l'h .in
tum.influencestheinstructions
given
tothat
particularperson
atthat
particular
time
(Jurdt
2007:
66—9).
The
emphasis
hereisnotonwhatthemeditation
experience
meanstothe
practi-
tioner.but the
quality
oftheirawarenessol‘it
(Jordl
2007:
73).
Ihis
approach
assumesa
great
dealoffaithonthe
part
of
practitioners.
that
they
willbe
willing
towork
extremely
hardto
gothrough
a
process
that
theymay
not
understand.as
wellasthefaithon
the
part
oftheirteachersthatthe
meaning
ol'thcsc
experiences
willberevealed
naturally
overtime.
In
Australia.
most
people
begin
their
insightpractice
withnocultural
background
withinwhich
they
can locatewhat
they
are
doing
andno
prior
commitmentto
Buddhism.Inthese
circumstances.
meaning
becomes
paramount.especially
asthe
encounterwithmeditation
practice
isalien
pan
urabroadersearchfor
meaning
inan
apparentlymeaningless
world.Practitionerswant
tounderstandwhat
they
are
doing.
and
why.
interms
alreadyculturally
familiar.Teachers
are
expected
to
provide
that
meaning.They
havetointroducethecultural
background
tothe
method
,
inother
words.basicBuddhism
—
aswellas
explain
thethree
character-
isticsandtheir
implications
for
the
way
inwhichwelive.
This
brings
metowhereI
standwithinthe
contemporaryinsight
movement.
TrainedinBurma
by
Burmese
teachers. Iknowthatitisneither
possible
nor
desirableto
attempt
a
transplant
of
BurmeseBuddhism.YetIalsoknowthat
the
cultural
strangeness
ofthedharrna
createsthe
temptation
todomesticate
it.
b)
translating
itintosomefamiliar
aspect
of
ourownculture
,
for
example.
as
a
formof
psychotherapy
(see.
for
example.Epstein1995)
orsecularhumanism
(see.
for
example.
Balchelor
I997).
How.
then.
can
insight
be
taught
in
contemporary
Australiaina
way
thatis
relevanttousbutwhichallowsstudents
entry
intothe
aliencultureofBuddhism?
Iseekabalancebetweenthe
Burmese
approach
of
insight
as
purephenom-
enology
andourintuitivesenseof
insight
as
meaning.Emphasizing
the
centrality
of
investigation
as
defining
thenatureof
vipassana
meditation.
1
seekto
convey
Transformation:of
insight
IlI
its
practice
as
an
openenquiry
intothehuman
condition
guidedby
thethemes
of
theBuddha's
teaching.
Howmuchofthis
teaching
isrelevant
toour
culture.
is
something
that
will
only
berevealedover
time
,
andIam
speaking
ofcenturies
ratherthanof
years.
I
begin
with
theBuddha.
My
owncommitment
istounderstmd
andcommu-
nicatetheBuddha's
teaching,
the ‘root'
(mula)
oftheTheravada
,
and
every
other
—
Buddhist
tradition.I
begin
byconveying
ameditation
method
that-makes
clearthefact of
change.
This istheMahasi
methodof
vipassana
meditation,
basedonthe
practice
of
following
themovement
ofawareness
from
primary
to
secondaryobject.
andback
again
(seeSayadaw
l97l).
Thiscultivates
whatthe
Buddhacalls
the
‘perception
of
impermanence‘
(arrived-Sarina).
the
open
door
through
which
insight
enters.This
perception
createsa
space
within which
we
can
pull
back
fromourhabitualstickiness
of
personal
involvement
longenough
to
recognize
andlearntoinhabitaworldno
longer
defined
by
our
normal,
taken-for-
granted
self-reference.
‘ ‘
But
itiscleartomethatitisnot
enoughjust
toteachand
practise
ameditation
technique.
Aswelearnnew
ways
of
perceiving
ourselves
andourworldwe
need
anew
language
withinwhich
they
can
be
conceptualized.
Weneedthe
language
of
the
Buddha.
whichhe
carefullydeveloped
throughout
the 45
years
ofhis
teaching
career.Thisisthesecond
aspect
of
myproject
of
teachinginsight
e
tomake
the
Buddha‘s
languagemy
ownand
communicateit
effectively
toothers,
sothat
it
Canenterourowncultureandbecome
asnaturalto
usasourownreflection
ina
mirror.
_
TheBuddha
provides
a
complete
vocabulary
oftechnicaltermslinked
by
their
places
withina
system
oflists(malika),
which
together
create
a
network
of
meaning(Gethin
1992).These
terms.andtheir
locations
within
the
lists.
provide
reference
points
thatenable
usto
recognizespecific
experiences
thatwe
stumbleinto
during
thecourseofour
practice
,
and
tolocatetheminthe
broader
network.An
eXperience
can
be
placed
Withina
contextthat
gives
it
meaning.
In
brief.
welearntoreadtext
and
experience
against
tint:another.
Gradually.
we
findourselves
seeing
and
inhabiting
thesame
landscape
asthat
mapped
by
the
Buddha.
Notes
1
During
thevassa(rainsretreat)
of
1987 Iwasabhikkhu
under
UPanditaatMahasi
Thalana
Yeiktha,
andwitnessed
his
attempt
to
change
the
way
inwhichfoodwas
offered
tothebhikkhusintheYciktha‘s
dining
hall.TheBuddha
Sasana
Nuggaha[\ch
ignored
hisadviceanditbecamc
cleartohismonastic
studentsthataconflicthad
brokenout
betweenthem.
‘ _
‘ _
SecBhikkhu
Nanamoli
(1975:
inxxviii)
foranintroduction
toandlocationofthis
text.
‘
3 Whilethe
concept
ofnibbann
isusedinvarious
ways.
itissometimes
spoken
of
Inthe
early
Inditionasarealexistent
thatcanbeknown
by
themind.Foradiscussion.
see
Collins
t
I998:
I63—77),
.
' >
4 ThetitleoI'abookin
whichMahasi
Sayadaw([985)gives
a
summary
oflheI6
insight
knowledges.
is