Presenting the Past Anxious History and Ancient Future in Hindutva India

(Tina Meador) #1
Ramraksha: Ram-ifying the Society and Modi-fying the State 169


  1. Popular Memory Group, "Popular Memory: Theory, Politics, Method," in
    Making Histories: Studies in History-Writing and Politics, ed. Richard Johnson et al.
    (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), pp. 205-10.

  2. Ibid., pp. 211-13.

  3. Michael Bommes and Patrick Wright, "'Charms of Residence': The Public
    and the Past," in Making Histories: Studies in History-Writing and Politics, ed. Rich-
    ard Johnson et al. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), p. 256.

  4. Jan Vansina, Oral Tradition as History (Madison: University of Wisconsin
    Press, 1985), pp. 3-8.

  5. Sumita S. Chakravarty, National Identity in Indian Popular Cinema, 1947-1987
    (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1993), pp. 160-62.

  6. Majid Hayat Siddiqi, "History and Society in a Popular Rebellion: Mewat,
    1920-1933," Comparative Studies in Society and History 28, no. 3 (July 1986), pp.
    442^3.

  7. Sakalesh, "Historical Legend, The Next Birth," Organiser, 9 July 1962, p. 11.

  8. Sudhir Kakar, The Inner World: A Psycho-analytic Study of Childhood and
    Society in India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1981), pp. 14-15. In a later book,
    Kakar includes both Hindus and Muslims "to bring out the subjective, experiential
    aspects of conflict between religious groups, to capture the psychological experi-
    ence of being a Hindu or a Muslim when one's community seems to be ranged
    against the other in a deadly confrontation." With the help of interviews, psy-
    chological tests, and speech transcripts of Hindu and Muslim fundamentalists, he
    seeks to analyze the fantasies, social representations, and modes of moral reason-
    ing about them that motivate and rationalize arson, looting, rape, and killing. See
    Kakar, The Colours of Violence (New Delhi: Viking, 1995), pp. viii-ix.

  9. Brian K. Smith, Classifying the Universe: The Ancient Indian Varna System and
    the Origins of Caste (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 324.

  10. A phrase used by Brian Smith; see ibid.

  11. See Peter van der Veer, "'God Must Be Liberated': A Hindu Liberation Move-
    ment in Ayodhya," Modern Asian Studies 21, no. 2 (April 1987), p. 300.

  12. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
    versity Press, 1977), p. 183.

  13. India Today, 15 May 1991.

  14. Zafar Agha, "Striking Down a Right," India Today, 15 June 1995.

  15. Radhika Desai, "The Image of India's Future?" Hindu, 6 March 2002.

  16. Pandey argues further that the changing character and modes of sectar-
    ian strife need careful study, and it must be emphasized that there is no essen-
    tial riot around which only the context changes. His prescription is to negate the
    prescribed center of vantage point, such as the nation-state, and reject the official
    archive as the primary source for the construction of general history. Pointing out
    the provisionality and contested character of all unities, such as periods, territo-
    ries, social groups, political formations, and other objects of historical analysis,
    he highlights the role of what the historians call a "fragment," such as a weaver's
    diary, a collection of poems, creation myths, women's songs, family genealogies,
    and local traditions of history, to challenge the state's construction of history. See
    Gyanendra Pandey, "In Defense of the Fragment: Writing about Hindu-Muslim
    Riots in India Today," Representations 37 (winter 1992), pp. 27-55.

Free download pdf