- Representative nature of participants. All the participants in the main study are
either English Majors or studying English as the second degree and their TEM 4
scores demonstrate that they represent the intermediate and advanced English
proficiency level of English Majors in the university setting. - Validity. As was already mentioned, in order to guarantee the validity of
qualitative data, we must make sure that all the participants in the current project
had no access to the research version of TEM 8 test before. So, we wouldfirst
ask participants whether they have done the research version of TEM 8 test and
afterward retain those who didn’t do the research version for data collection;
otherwise, it could be a waste of time and energy for both participants and the
researcher. - Oral expression. TAP data collection is contingent upon participants’“thinking
aloud”in the colloquial form; therefore, participants’oral expression is signif-
icant in determining the quality of data. The threshold criterion in screening
participants is that they can express their thinking clearly and articulately.
6.2.2 Rationale of Grouping.............................
In the real situation, we divided participants into two groups in terms of the year
task they tackled as the research version. According to the Independent Samples T
Test results, there’s no significant difference across the two groups’task perfor-
mances in terms of their means, because the t-value is−0.343 with the significance
level of 0.7360.05. In another word, participants in two different year task
groups have approximately the same lecture comprehension ability level on average
(see Table6.1and6.2).
Table 6.1 Descriptive statistics for 2010 and 2013 task groups (research version)
Task year 2010 (N = 8) 2013 (N = 8)
Mean Standard deviation (SD) Mean SD
3.688 1.6677 3.938 1.2082
Table 6.2 Independent Samples T Test for 2010 and 2013 task groups (research version)
Levene’s test for
Equality of variances t-test for equality of means
F Sig. t df Sig.
(2-tailed)
Mean
difference
Std error
difference
0.738 0.405 −0.343 14 0.736 −0.2500 0.7281
70 6 Employing the Think-Alound Method...