One welfare a framework to improve animal welfare and human well-being

(Romina) #1

10 Introduction


We often see the concepts of animal health and animal welfare as separate

entities. However, Animal Welfare encompasses five freedoms and domains

that include animal health (FAWC, 1993; Mellor, 2016): nutrition, environ-

ment, health, behaviour and mental states (Table 1). Based on this basic prin-

ciple, which is recognized globally, the definition of One Welfare could indeed

encompass One Health, instead of complementing it. However, excellent col-

laborative networks, projects and policies have been built around the concept

of One Health, and so the goal is to develop One Welfare as a complement to

ongoing One Health programmes, fostering the collaborative approach.

Healthy individuals can suffer poor welfare such as fear, loneliness and

boredom. Certain medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy, many veterinary

treatments) can improve health but temporarily harm welfare. At other

times poor health occurs without poor welfare (e.g. disabled individuals can

be happy and pain free; obesity does not harm welfare in the short term).

However, both welfare and health in humans and animals are intimately

connected. There is great overlap between the two, as health is a key part of

welfare, not something separate.

One Health typically focuses on the health aspects of humans, animals

and the environment, and most times is predominantly disease focused. As a

result the issues captured under the concept of One Welfare (i.e. psycho–

social–economic aspects) are relegated to the periphery. Many agree that

welfare is often not included, or is neglected, within the One Health

A more joined-up and multidisciplinary approach could be more efficient and
effective. For example, animal welfare indicators can be used as a sign of a farmer
(i.e. anyone taking care of livestock on a day-to-day basis, including the farm
owner, family and farm staff) being successful or failing to cope and could be
used to detect poor farmer health or well-being. Equally, poor farmer well-being
detected by a medical practitioner could indicate a risk of poor animal welfare
on the farm. Different professionals could all play a part in improving both farm
animal welfare and farmer well-being.
While some are of the view that One Welfare is truly under the umbrella of
One Health, others believe that One Welfare is broader and encompasses One
Health.

While practitioners have focused on implementation of various global

standards, the introduction of the concept of One Health has sparked an

evidence-based body that goes beyond one discipline. There is, however, a

big gap in relation to welfare-focused approaches and we hope that this

book helps to enable working methods that better integrate animal welfare.

To achieve a true One Welfare working approach we should aim for

coalitions that can deliver cross-training and cross-networks, and which can

break down silos to allow for more efficient sharing of information about

families in need (adapted from Phillips, 2014).
Free download pdf