Advances in the Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament, 2nd edition

(Wang) #1

322 Surgical Treatment


Conzemius MG, Evans RB. Care giver placebo effect
in dogs with osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc
2012;241:1314–1319.
Conzemius MG. RCCL Injury: The role of stabiliza-
tion. Proceedings from the American College of
Veterinary Surgeons Annual Symposium, Chicago,
IL, 2007, p. 332.
Conzemius MG, Evans RJ, Besancon MF,et al.Effect
of surgical technique on limb function after surgery
for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs.
J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:232–239.
Corr SA, Brown C. A comparison of outcomes fol-
lowing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and cra-
nial tibial wedge osteotomy procedures. Vet Comp
Orthop Traumatol 2007;20:312–319.
Cunningham T, Jessel R, Zurakowski D,et al. Delayed
gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imag-
ing of cartilage to predict early failure of Bernese
periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia. J Bone
Joint Surg 2006;88:1540–1548.
DeCamp CE, Riggs CM, Olivier NB,et al. Kinematic
evaluation of gait in dogs with cranial cruciate lig-
ament rupture. Am J Vet Res 1996;57:120–126.
Dow C, Michel KE, Love M,et al. Evaluation of opti-
mal sampling interval for activity monitoring in
companion dogs. Am J Vet Res 2009;70:444–448.
Dupuis J, Harari J, Papageorges M,et al. Evaluation of
fibular head transposition for repair of experimen-
tal cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs. Vet Surg
1994;23:1–12.
Evans RB, Gordon W, Conzemius M. The effect of
velocity on ground reaction forces in dogs with
lameness attributable to tearing of the cranial cru-
ciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:1479–1481.
Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and
optimization of force platform gait analysis in
Labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated
at the walking gait. Vet Surg 2005;34:445–449.
Gordon WJ, Conzemius MG, Riedesel E, et al.
The relationship between limb function and
radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs with stifle
osteoarthrosis. Vet Surg 2003;32:451–454.
Hill CM, Conzemius MG, Smith GK,et al. Bacterial
culture of the canine stifle joint following surgi-
cal repair of ruptured cranial cruciate ligament. Vet
Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999;12:1–5.
Hoffmann DE, Miller JM, Ober CP, et al. Tibial
tuberosity advancement in 65 canine stifles. Vet
Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006;19:219–227.
Horstman CL, Conzemius MG, Evans R,et al. Assess-
ing the efficacy of perioperative oral carprofen
after cranial cruciate surgery using noninvasive,
objective pressure platform gait analysis. Vet Surg
2004;33:286–289.
Hutton JL. Number needed to treat and number
needed to harm are not the best way to report and
assess the results of randomized clinical trials. Br J
Haematol 2009;146:27–30.
Innes JF, Bacon D, Lynch C, Pollard A. Long-term
outcome of surgery for dogs with cranial cruci-


ate ligament deficiency. Vet Record 2000;147:325–
328.
Jevens DJ, DeCamp CE, Hauptman J,et al.Useof
force-plate analysis of gait to compare two surgi-
cal techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate lig-
ament rupture in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996;57:389–
393.
Lascelles BD, Knazovicky D, Case B,et al. A canine-
specific anti-nerve growth factor antibody alle-
viates pain and improves mobility and function
in dogs with degenerative joint disease-associated
pain. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:101.
Luther JK, Cook CR, Cook JL. Meniscal release in cru-
ciate ligament intact stifles causes lameness and
medial compartment cartilage pathology in dogs
12 weeks postoperatively. Vet Surg 2009;38:520–
529.
Marsolais GS, McLean S, Derrick T,et al. Kinematic
analysis of the hind limb during swimming and
walking in healthy dogs and dogs with surgically
corrected cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Am
Vet Med Assoc 2003;222:739–743.
Rialland P, Bichot S, Moreau M,et al. Clinical valid-
ity of outcome pain measures in naturally occur-
ring canine osteoarthritis. BMC Vet Res 2012;8:162.
Stein S, Schmoekel H. Short-term and eight to 12
months results of a tibial tuberosity advancement
as treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament
damage. J Small Anim Pract 2008;49:398–404.
Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T,et al. Force plate
gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial
tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruci-
ate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol
2008;21:243–9.
Walton MB, Cowderoy E, Lascelles D,etal. Evaluation
of construct and criterion validity for the ‘Liverpool
Osteoarthritis in Dogs’ (LOAD) clinical metrology
instrument and comparison to two other instru-
ments. PLoS One 2013;8:e58125.
Waxman AW, Robinson DA, Evans R,et al.Relation-
ship between objective and subjective assessment
of limb function in normal dogs with an experi-
mentally induced lameness. Vet Surg 2008;37:241–
246.
Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Marlovits S,et al.Quanti-
tiative T2 mapping during follow-up after matrix-
associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation
(MCAT): Full-thickness and zonal evaluation to
visualize the maturation of cartilage repair tissue.
J Orthop Res 2009;27:957–963.
Wucherer KL, Ober C, Conzemius MG. The use of
delayed gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance
imaging of cartilage and T2 mapping to evaluate
articular cartilage in the normal canine elbow. Vet
Rad Ultrasound 2012; 53:57–63.
Wucherer KL, Conzemius MG, Evans RB,et al. Short-
term and long-term outcomes for overweight dogs
with cranial cruciate ligament rupture treated sur-
gically or nonsurgically. J Am Vet Med Assoc
2013:242:1364–1372.
Free download pdf