The EconomistJuly 27th 2019 Business 49
2
Bartleby The curse of efficiency
Economist.com/blogs/bartleby
C
harles handyhas been through a
lot of challenges in a long career as a
manager at Royal Dutch Shell, an oil
giant, followed by a spell in academia
and acclaim as a business writer champi-
oning more flexible, less hierarchical
organisations. His latest battle is with his
health. Earlier this year, the then 86-year-
old Irishman suffered a stroke which
meant that he had to learn to walk, talk
and even swallow all over again. True to
his reputation as a business guru, the
experience taught him a valuable lesson,
as he explained to Bartleby in a recent
interview.
As far as Mr Handy was concerned,
the point of his hospital stay was to allow
him to recover as fully as possible. That
meant he needed to be up and about. In
the view of the nurses, that was a poten-
tial problem; he might fall and hurt
himself. Their priority was to keep him
safe. In practice, that required him to stay
in bed and keep out of trouble.
The experience led him to reflect on
the “curse of efficiency”. Organisations
focus so much on efficiency that they fail
to be effective. Instead of concentrating
on their core goal, they pay attention to
narrower measures like cutting costs, or
reducing the inconvenience suffered by
their staff. Examples of the problem can
be found in many places. The purpose of
education is to prepare children for later
life, but all too often the focus is on
getting the children to pass exams.
The drive for efficiency can also seem
callous. Mr Handy argues that managers
tend to like things more than they like
people. If all the staff were replaced by
robots, he says, running a business
would be a lot easier. As it is, there is a
temptation to try to turn people into
things by calling them “human re-
sources”. Call someone a resource, and it
is a small step to assuming that they can be
treated like a thing, subject to being con-
trolled and, ultimately, dispensed with
when surplus to requirements.
Perhaps Mr Handy’s philosophy is best
summed up as “what do they know of
business who only business know?” Before
his stroke he wrote a book, “21 Letters On
Life And Its Challenges”, which takes the
form of advice passed on to his grand-
children. The focus is more on gentle
wisdom than on management theory.
Indeed, Mr Handy argues that most organ-
isations whose principal assets are skilled
people, such as universities or law firms,
tend not to use the term “manager”. Those
in charge of them are called deans, direc-
tors or partners. Their real job is best de-
scribed as leadership rather than manage-
ment. And one of the primary functions of
leadership is setting the right purpose for
an organisation.
Leadership also involves letting sub-
ordinates learn for themselves. When he
started work for Shell, he was running the
firm’s oil business in Sarawak, Malaysia.
He had studied Greek and Latin at univer-
sity and knew nothing about business or
energy. There was no telephone link to
the regional office in Singapore, and
letters took weeks to arrive. No senior
manager felt inclined to visit.
Mr Handy says this gave him the
opportunity to learn from his mistakes
in private. He argues that “education is
an experience understood in tranquillity.
You look back and see where you went
wrong.”
Because of this, he thinks that busi-
ness schools need to change. What they
tend to do at the moment is encapsulate
the best practices of current businesses,
codify them and pass them on. But the
real challenge that business-school
graduates will face is dealing with the
unexpected. That cannot be taught in the
classroom but needs to be experienced in
the outside world. So students should
spend time at small businesses or com-
munity projects, and then write a report
on how they coped.
Furthermore, if these students aspire
to be leaders, they need the ability to tell
stories and create a culture. That requires
broader knowledge than studying only
balance-sheets and sales projections.
Appropriately enough, Mr Handy has
hopes of writing yet another book, based
on the Bible, which he says is an excel-
lent case study of storytelling. Clearly, he
refuses to let illness hold him back.
Looking back over his career, he believes
that teaching and writing is all about
creating the “Aha!” moment. That occurs
when people realise that an idea the
teacher or writer has advanced is both
useful and something they already knew
but had not articulated. Bartleby hopes
that Mr Handy’s readers will be saying
“Aha!” for some time to come.
Reflections of a business guru
At his confirmation hearings he agreed
with a senator who said that “dominant Sil-
icon Valley firms could use their market
power...to discriminate against rival pro-
ducts, services or viewpoints.”
This last point in particular worries Re-
publicans. They view these giants as liberal
bastions, which will discriminate against
right-wing views in efforts to rid their plat-
forms of extreme and hateful content. This
month President Donald Trump held a “So-
cial Media Summit” where right-wing
bloggers aired their grievances. In a sign of
how far critics will go, Peter Thiel, a suc-
cessful tech investor and sometime de-
fender of Mr Trump, recently speculated
that Google had been “infiltrated” by Chi-
nese intelligence services (despite a Trump
tweet promising to “take a look”, his ad-
ministration later dismissed the idea).
Whether these are just acts of intimida-
tion ahead of presidential elections next
year remains to be seen. If Facebook’s set-
tlement with the ftcis any guide, Big Tech
could still emerge mostly unscathed. The
large fine and its new privacy bureaucracy
notwithstanding, Facebook does not have
to change its data-collection practices and
is off the hook for any more claims that it
violated the previous ftc settlement.
In a twist, Microsoft, the world’s most
valuable listed firm, with a market capital-
isation of over $1trn, has hardly been
touched by the techlash. It has learned hard
lessons from going through the regulatory
wringer at the turn of the century: look be-
yond the cash cow (Windows); rapacious-
ness ultimately does not pay; and work
with regulators. Another Hemingway
quote is less well-known among geeks:
“The world breaks everyone and afterward
many are strong at the broken places.” 7