JUNE 2019 WILD WEST 53
LIB
RAR
Y^ O
F^ C
ON
GRE
SS
Did the grieving Samuel Sturgis offer reliable criticism
of the commander who died with his men on the Little Bighorn?
By John Koster
THE
COLONEL
WHO BLAMED
CUSTER
C
olonel Samuel Sturgis was a hard-luck soldier—
though his hardest luck fell on his regiment during
the ill-fated June 1876 battle on Montana Terri-
tory’s Little Bighorn River while he was on detached duty at
a recruiting depot 1,000 miles away in St. Louis. Seventh U.S.
Cavalry Second Lieutenant James Garland “Jack” Sturgis of
Company E, the colonel’s firstborn son, was one of three regi-
mental officers whose bodies were never identified after Custer’s
Last Stand that June 25. A pair of bloodied underdrawers found
in the Indian village after the battle were tentatively identified as
having belonged to the lieutenant. One of four severed heads
found in the village suggested to some officers that 22-year-old
Sturgis may have been captured, tortured and mutilated. Most
accounts from Indian participants deny they took any prisoners
into the village—though after a battle in which upward of 10
Indian women and children were killed in a surprise attack,
ritual mutilation was positively rampant.
Lieutenant Sturgis’ death came little more than a year after
that of his 4-year-old brother, Thomas Glenn Sturgis, who died
of natural causes at Jefferson Barracks, Mo. Thus their father
was doubly devastated.
In his anguish Sturgis touched off what came to be a leading
alternative version of the Last Stand—that Lt. Col. George Arm-
strong Custer and the “Custer Clan” of loyal officers were to
blame for the catastrophe, elsewhere widely attributed to the
purported cowardice of Major Marcus Reno and the deliberate