American History – June 2019

(John Hannent) #1

JUNE 2019 35


C
A
LI


FO


R
N
IA


S


TA


T
E^
PA


R
K
S^


(^2


)^


the native born is a citizen, and a citizen by virtue of his birth


alone?” asked Senator Lot M. Morrill (R-Maine). Officially


recognizing that principle, however, had wider implications,


and officials worried about the bill’s reach.


Would enactment of the bill make citizens of “the children


of Chinese and Gypsies born in this country?” asked Senator


Edgar Cowan (R-Pennsylvania). “Undoubtedly,” Trumbull


replied. Cowan angrily predicted that “the day may not be


very far distant when California, instead of belonging to the


Indo-European race, may belong to the Mongolian...” The


very idea of granting non-whites citizenship outraged Sena-


tor Garrett Davis, a Unionist from Kentucky. Defining the


American nation as a “Government and a political organiza-


tion of white people,” Davis asserted that when “a negro or


Chinaman is attempted to be obtruded into it, the sufficient


cause to repel him is that he is a negro or Chinaman.” Senator


Peter G. Van Winkle, a West Virginia Unionist, feared immi-


grants “whose mixture with our race...could only tend to the


deterioration of the mass.” Van Winkle worried that the bill’s


language was broad enough to cover “a future immigration to


this country of which we have no conception.”


Representative James F. Wilson (R-Iowa) insisted the bill’s


reach was not unlimited. According to Wilson, that reach


“Paper Children”


Young Chinese often


claimed ties to rela-


tives already in the


United States.


Newcomers from the East


Angel Island, at San Francisco, was the


entry point for many Asian immigrants.

Free download pdf