The Economist June 11th 2022 25
United States
TheJanuary6thhearings
The insurrection televised
C
ongressional hearings have provid
ed some of the great dramas of Ameri
can politics. A Senate probe in 1923 into the
corrupt sale of oil leases at Teapot Dome,
Wyoming, sullied the reputation of Presi
dent Warren Harding and was considered
“the greatest and most sensational scan
dal”. Then the Watergate hearings, in 1973,
raised the bar. Tens of millions of people
tuned in to watch live broadcasts of Rich
ard Nixon’s slowdrip demise.
Massive public interest was in both cas
es justified by the gravity of the issue in
hand—probity at the highest levels of gov
ernment—and by Congress’s success in
upholding it. The same can be said of the
Senate’s ArmyMcCarthy hearings of 1954,
and, less resoundingly, of the IranContra
hearings of 1987, from which Ronald Rea
gan’s reputation never fully recovered.
Boxoffice value aside, such hearings were
an advert for congressional oversight and a
tribute to the American system.
The public hearings that the House’s
January 6th select committee will hold
from June 9thare arguably more important
than all the above combined. For the past
year the committee’s nine members—sev
en Democrats and two Republicans—and
its investigators have been working to un
cover the circumstances that gave rise to a
multipronged effort to stop the transfer of
power after the 2020 presidential election.
As with the Watergate hearings, the
committee’s investigation is much broader
than the incident—an attack on the Capitol
by 2,500 of Donald Trump’s supporters—
that it was named after. Divided into col
ourcoded teams, its members have inves
tigated the campaign by Mr Trump and his
coterie to press state, local and federal offi
cials to overturn the election result; the
role of rightwing extremist groups in rein
forcing that effort; the “Save America”
Trump rally outside the White House that
preceded the Capitol riot; and the financ
ing of all of this. The issue in hand is ac
cordingly not mere probity, a quality no
one expects of Mr Trump, but the continu
ing threat to democratic government that
he and his supporters represent.
Despite fierce pushback from the for
mer president and Republicans at large,
the committee has conducted more than
1,000 interviews—including with insur
rectionists, intelligence agents and the few
senior members of Mr Trump’s retinue
willing to testify. Having also reviewed ov
er 140,000 documents, it is due to release a
report on its findings in September. The
impending six public sessions will there
fore be less like the usual congressional in
quiry than an impeachment trial. They will
not invite Americans to witness the pro
cess of investigation so much as show
them what has already been discovered.
“The hearings will tell a story that will
really blow the roof off the House,” predict
ed one of the committee’s members, Jamie
Raskin. “People must watch, and they must
understand how easily our democratic sys
tem can unravel if we don’t defend it,” en
joined its Republican vicechairwoman,
Liz Cheney, on June 5th.
The committee’s only previous public
hearing, in July last year, combined footage
of the insurrection with harrowing testi
mony from four of the lawenforcement
officers who fought it. This month’s hear
ings will contain a similar mix of live testi
WASHINGTON, DC
The House committee investigating the January 6th attack on the United States
Capitol is about to reveal its findings. Half of America is watching
→Alsointhissection
26 Pennsylvania’sSenaterace
27 SanFranciscov progressivism
28 Thepushforgunreform
30 Fostercareandrelativesafety
32 Lexington: Climate lesson from Miami