The Economist - USA (2022-06-11)

(Antfer) #1

78 Science&technology TheEconomistJune11th 2022


For  decades,  researchers  had  thought
myopia was mostly genetic. It runs in fam­
ilies, and genomic studies have turned up
several  gene  variants  which  increase  the
risk  of  developing  the  condition.  There
were  early  hints,  though,  that  this  could
not be the whole story. A study of Inuit in
Alaska, published in 1969, found that myo­
pia  was  virtually  unknown  in  those  mid­
dle­aged or older, but that rates were above
50%  in  older  children  and  young  adults.
Such a change is much too fast to be purely
genetic,  and  it  had  happened  just  as  the
study  participants  had  begun  to  adopt  a
more  settled,  Westernised  way  of  life.  But
the  results  went  against  the  dogma  of  the
day, says Dr Morgan, and were ignored.
The spike in East Asia, which occurred
as  places  there  industrialised,  was  harder
to dismiss. Short­sightedness is stereotyp­
ically  an  affliction  of  the  bookish,  and  a
procession  of  studies  has  confirmed  a
strong,  reliable  link  with  education.  “The
more  educated  you  are,  and  the  higher
your grades, and the more you participate
in  after­school  classes  and  tutorials—the
more likely you are [to be myopic]”, says Dr
Morgan. And an intriguing study on ortho­
dox Jewish children in Israel, in the 1990s,
confirmed the link with long school hours.
It  showed  that  boys—who  receive  inten­
sive religious education in addition to the
normal  curriculum—were  more  myopic
than their sisters, who do not. 
Since there is no obvious way in which
learning sums, spelling or even the Talmud
could cause short­sightedness directly, the
assumption  was  that  education  was  a
proxy  for  something  else.  One  possibility
is  the  popular  notion  (raised  by  Johannes
Kepler, a German astronomer who himself
needed  glasses,  more  than  400  years  ago)
that myopia is linked to too much close­in
work, such as reading and writing.
That  theory  remains  popular,  says  Dr
Rose,  but  evidence  for  it  is  mixed  at  best.
Instead,  the  dominant  hypothesis  now  is
that exposure to daylight is the main vari­
able. A study of Californian children, pub­
lished in 2007, found that time spent out­

doorswasstronglyassociatedwitha lower
riskofmyopia.Anotherpaper,published
thefollowingyearbyDrsRoseandMorgan
andtheircolleagues,followedmorethan
4,000childreninSydneyforthreeyears
andcametoa similarconclusion.Thetype
ofactivity—sports,walking,picnics—did
notseemtomatter.Simplybeingoutdoors
was the crucial point. The researchers
cross­checked theclose­workhypothesis
andfoundthatbeingoutsidedrasticallyre­
ducedtheriskofshort­sightedness,even
forchildrenthatdida lotofit.
Thistheoryfitsthedataneatly.Itex­
plains whymyopia seems,likediabetes
andheartdisease,tobewhatdoctorscalla
“diseaseofaffluence”—morecommonin
richcountriesthanpoorones—sinceeco­
nomic  growth  brings  with  it  more  educa­
tion,  and  therefore,  for  children,  more
time inside. It explains why rates are high
in East Asia in particular, says Dr Morgan,
since  the  ubiquity  of  private  tutoring  and
after­school  classes  mean  schoolchildren
there routinely work longer days than their
Western counterparts. Most South Korean
students,  for  instance,  attend  private  tu­
toring schools called hagwonsin which les­
sons often stretch well into the evening. 

Seeing the light
The  daylight­exposure  theory  is  also  bol­
stered by animal studies, in which that ex­
posure can be carefully controlled, and in
which  dimness  reliably  produces  short
sight. Researchers have a putative mecha­
nism, too. Exposure to bright light appears
to stimulate the production of dopamine, a
neurotransmitter, in the retina. Dopamine,
in  turn,  seems  to  help  regulate  the  rate  at
which the eye grows. Too little, and the eye
grows too long to focus properly.
Human  trials,  too,  confirm  the  theory.
One of the biggest, led by Pei­Chang Wu of
the  Chang  Gung  University  College  of
Medicine,  in  Taiwan,  was  published  in


  1.  It  reported  results  from  millions  of
    Taiwanese primary­school pupils who had
    gone  through  the  school  system  between
    2001 and 2015. In 2010 the government in­
    stituted  a  programme  called  “Tian­Tian
    Outdoor 120”, which encouraged schools to
    take  pupils  outside  for  two  hours  a  day.
    After it was implemented, rates of myopia
    fell, slowly but steadily, from 49.4% in 2012
    to 46.1% in 2015—reversing a decades­long
    trend of rising rates. 
    Exactly how much light is needed is un­
    clear,  though  Dr  Morgan  reckons  10,000
    lux is in the right ballpark. That is about as
    much  as  you  might  get  in  the  shade  on  a
    reasonably  sunny  day.  (Direct  sunlight  in
    the tropics can exceed 100,000 lux.) Levels
    indoors,  by  contrast,  rarely  exceed  1,000
    lux. It is technically possible to light class­
    rooms  to  10,000  lux,  notes  Dr  Rose.  But
    even  with  led lighting,  she  says,  the
    amount  of  heat  produced  would  require


specialistairconditioning,andtheglare
mightbeenoughtomakereadingtricky.
Researchershavealsobeenworkingon
waystoslowmyopia’sprogressiononceit
hasstarted.Oneistouselowdosesofatro­
pine,a poisonouschemicalfoundindead­
lynightshade—thejuiceofwhichwasonce
usedbywomentodilatetheirpupils,inor­
dertomakethemselveslookmoreattrac­
tive. Another is specially designed “or­
tho­k”contactlenses,whichareintended
to reshapethecornea whileworn. (The
corneaisthefront,transparentpartofthe
eye,whichdoesmostoftheworkoffocus­
inglightontheretina;theeye’sso­called
lensismainlyforfinetuning.)Thesealso
seem effective, though Dr Rose worries
abouttheside­effectsfromgivingcontact
lensestochildren,sinceifmisusedthey
cancauseirreversiblecornealscarring.
Sophisticated pairsofspectaclesmay
help,too.In 2020 thebmjpublisheda Chi­
nesetrialof“defocusincorporatedmulti­
plesegments”(dims)glasses.Thelensesof
thesehavea centralzonedesignedtocor­
rectthewearer’ssight,whichissurround­
edbyhundredsofothersmallzonesofdif­
ferentopticalpower.Theideaistoprovide
bothclearvisionthroughthecentralpart
ofthelensanddeliberatelydistortedvi­
sion through the smaller zones, since
poorlyfocusedvisionisthoughttosignal
totheeyetoslowitsrateofgrowth.Wear­
ingdimsglassesappearedtocuttherateof
myopicprogressionroughlyinhalf.
Eyedrops, more sunlight and clever
glassesmightbeabletopreventorslow
myopiainfuture generationsofschool­
children.Butbythetimesufferersreach
adulthood, the condition is permanent.
Thismeansthatinsomecountries,a pub­
lic­healthproblemisalreadybakedin.For
thosewithreallyseriousmyopia,saysDr
Rose,andwhoareatthehighestriskofbad
complications,unhealthychangesinthe
eyecanstarttooccurwhenpatientsarein
their40s.“Andsomeofthosearenotinany
waytreatable.”n

Clear as daylight
Myopia, estimated prevalence at age 20, %

Source:“Theepidemicsofmyopia:Aetiology and prevention”,
byIanMorganetal.,ProgressinRetinaland Eye Research, 201

1

100

80

60

40

20

0
11200090807060501938

South Korea

Hong Kong

Singapore

Taiwan

Look out!
Prevalence of myopia and severe myopia
in school-leavers, 201 or latest available, %

Source:“Theepidemicsofmyopia: Aetiology and prevention”,
byIanMorganetal.,Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 201

2

Ejina(China)

Singapore

Jeju(SouthKorea)

Shandong(China)

Taiwan

Guangzhou(China)

Seoul(SouthKorea)

100806040200

Myopia Severe myopia
Free download pdf