FEBRUARY/MARCH 2018 47
maintain a wide performance groove,
but the fractional rig requires far greater
understanding before the same or bet-
ter performance can be achieved” (Blue
Water Sailing Manual, Barry Pickthall,
2006). is comment is applicable to
a rig whose mast bend is varied as
From the ocean-racing perspective,
one disadvantage of the fractional rig is
that it can be di cult to sail: “ e mast-
head rig can be sailed to within 90% of
its optimum with comparative ease,
requiring only subtle changes to hal-
yard or sheet tension in order to
genny’s advantage. As it turned out,
the genny conferred no speed advan-
tages, and the eet stayed with the
blade-type working jibs. e moral of
the story might be that jib overlap on
many boats can be seductive but
misleading.”
The P-32 Petrel at anchor with the mast partially bent by the diamond shrouds with their aft-swept spreaders. At the stern the six-
part tackle on the starboard leg of the backstay has not been fully taken up to increase the bend to the sailing con guration and
to further tension the forestay. The two-part outhaul/secondary jibsheet leads from the clew down to the car on the jib club track.
The midclub primary jibsheet just forward of the house leads down to the foredeck traveler. The four-part mainsheet leads from
blocks at the gooseneck to those at the chainplates, thence aft port and starboard to the cockpit.
JEP
FractionalRig171-ADFinal.indd 47 1/2/18 9:40 AM