The Washington Post - USA (2022-06-12)

(Antfer) #1

A16 EZ RE THE WASHINGTON POST.SUNDAY, JUNE 12 , 2022


to run their air conditioner this
summer.
Higher energy prices are also
often a harbinger of an economic
downturn, as consumers respond
to higher prices by reducing their
spending on other goods and ser-
vices. Historically, oil price spikes
like the ones now facing the West
have “always” preceded or led to
an economic recession, according
to a research note by Jeremy
Grantham, an analyst at GMO, an
investment and asset manage-
ment firm.
“I’d be on high alert right now
to see if the economy succumbs to
this latest stab in the heart from
higher energy prices,” said Chris
Rupkey, chief economist at
F wdbonds. “Realistically, it’ll be a
miracle if we don’t go into a
recession.”
But the post-covid economy
has repeatedly defied experts’ ex-
pectations, and there is ample
reason to believe strong growth
could survive higher energy pric-
es. Gasoline purchases accounted

BY LAURA REILEY

The Food and Drug Adminis-
tration investigated reports that
as many as nine children have
died since early 2021 after con-
suming baby formula produced
at an Abbott Nutrition plant in
Michigan — seven more than
previously acknowledged by the
FDA, according to newly re-
leased documents.
The FDA previously said two
children had died and two were
sickened after consuming formu-
la from the Sturgis plant that
contained the bacterium
cronobacter sakazakii. But the
agency acknowledged on Friday
that it had received additional
reports of children dying or be-
ing sickened after allegedly
drinking formula made there.
In all nine fatalities, the agen-
cy was unable to identify the
source of the infection. In some
cases, there was not enough
leftover formula to test. Of the
babies who died of infections
from cronobacter, genomic se-
quencing turned up different
strains than what was discovered
at the Sturgis plant during an
inspection this spring.
But the disclosure deepens
questions about Abbott’s mainte-
nance of the plant, which makes
a large share of the nation’s


powdered formula supply. It also
raises further doubts about the
FDA’s handling of complaints
related to the Sturgis factory,
which was shuttered for five
months over food safety con-
cerns, contributing to a nation-
wide shortage of baby formula.
The complaints were first re-
ported by eFoodAlert and food
safety expert Phyllis Entis, who
obtained them through a Free-
dom of Information Act request.
The newly reported infant
deaths were included in a list of
128 consumer complaints col-
lected by the FDA via the agen-
cy’s consumer complaint system
between December and March.
Identities of the dead children
were not made public and identi-
fied only by case number.
“The FDA takes its responsi-
bility seriously to ensure the
foods we eat are safe and meet
our rigorous standards for quali-
ty and safety,” an FDA spokes-
man said in a statement. “Based
on FDA’s thorough review and
investigation of all 128 consumer
complaints reported to the agen-
cy and recently released to media
in response to a FOIA request,
only four complaints could be
included in the case series associ-
ated with the Abbott Nutrition
investigation.”
In a statement Friday, Abbott
Nutrition said no causal relation-
ship had been established be-
tween Abbott’s products and any
of the reported deaths.
“Abbott conducts microbiolog-
ical testing on products prior to
distribution and no Abbott for-
mula distributed to consumers

tested positive for Cronobacter
sakazakii or Salmonella. All re-
tained product tested by Abbott
and the FDA during the inspec-
tion of the facility came back
negative for Cronobacter saka-
zakii and/or Salmonella. No Sal-
monella was found at the Sturgis
facility,” Abbott’s statement said.
“There appears to have been
no sense of urgency within the
FDA to address a deteriorating
situation in a production facility
that was, in many cases, the sole
source of nourishment to a vul-

nerable population,” Entis told
The Washington Post in a state-
ment.
Sam Geisler, an attorney rep-
resenting more than two dozen
families who say their children
were sickened after consuming
formula made by Abbott, said the
reports are evidence of systemic
problems at the Sturgis facility.
“With every development, it
becomes clearer and clearer that
the babies were the last consider-
ation on the part of regulators
and the company,” Geisler said.

In congressional testimony,
FDA Commissioner Robert M.
Califf described conditions at the
plant as “egregious.”
But Califf’s agency has also
come under fire for not acting
quickly on complaints about op-
erations there.
In addition to the nine deaths,
consumers who submitted com-
plaints described 25 incidents
reported by the complainants as
“life-threatening illness/injury”
and 80 instances of “non-life-
threatening illness/injury.” The

severity of the complaints were
not corroborated by medical pro-
fessionals, except in the case of
death or confirmed presence of a
bacteria like salmonella or
cronobacter.
The Centers for Disease Con-
trol and Prevention confirmed
the presence of the bacteria and
performed genome sequencing
in the four previously disclosed
cases, though the source of the
infection — whether the formula
or something else — could not be
confirmed.
“The CDC has not been noti-
fied of additional cases received
via the consumer complaint sys-
tem at this time and there is no
pending testing related to this
investigation,” said Brian Kat-
zowitz, health communication
specialist for the CDC.
The Sturgis plant reopened on
June 4. The FDA has had investi-
gators on site for several days to
observe improvements made to
the facility as one of several
conditions for the reopening.
“The crisis that has crippled
the ability of parents across the
country to find the formula they
need to feed their babies could
have been avoided if the FDA had
the necessary resources and
leadership structure to make
food safety a priority,” said Scott
Faber, senior vice president for
government affairs for the Envi-
ronmental Working Group.
Califf said in hearings on Capi-
tol Hill last month that once the
baby formula crisis was resolved,
the agency would focus on reor-
ganizing the food safety leader-
ship at the FDA.

Files cite claims of more illness, death after baby formula consumption


TANNEN MAURY/EPA-EFE/SHUTTERSTOCK
The reopened Abbott Nutrition plant in Sturgis, Mich. In all nine fatalities involving children who died
after consuming formula produced there, the FDA was unable to identify the source of the infection.

FDA, Abbott Nutrition
say there’s no evidence
product caused fatalities

Energy costs rose by 3.
p ercent from April to May, while
energy prices overall have spiked
by 35 percent since last year,
according to a Bureau of Labor
Statistics report released Friday.
Inflation overall reached 8.
p ercent in May, the government
reported Friday, the highest rate
in 40 years.
The unrelenting upward
march of gas prices has emerged
as one of the chief domestic politi-
cal threats to the Biden adminis-
tration ahead of this fall’s
m idterm elections, and the White
House has few obvious solutions
to reverse the trend despite an
intensive push by top aides and
the president himself. The White
House is now caught between
liberal allies in Congress who are
pushing for escalating a populist
attack on oil and gas firms, and
the views of some of their trusted
economic experts who believe
those efforts could prove counter-
productive.
A poll released Thursday by
The Washington Post and George
Mason University’s Schar School
found that Americans were
broadly concerned both with in-
flation generally and rising gas
prices in particular. About 44
percent of drivers said they have
only partially filled their car’s gas
tank as a result of higher prices,
with 61 percent of those earning
under $50,000 a year doing so.
Roughly two-thirds of drivers re-
ported making fewer trips to the
grocery store because of rising
gas prices.
“This is a huge economic and
political albatross around the
neck of the administration, and
the difficulty is there really isn’t
an easy way to tackle this using
the policy tools available to
them,” said Eswar Prasad, an
economist at Cornell University.
Americans are not accustomed
to seeing energy prices as high as
they have been over the last sev-
eral months. The average price
for a gallon of gas in the U.S. hit
$5.004 on Saturday, according to
AAA. Already, at least 19 states
have average gas prices of $5 or
more, with California above $6 a
gallon. Some analysts think
America could near a nationwide
average of $6 a gallon by the end
of the summer. Diesel prices, par-
ticularly important to the truck-
ing and construction industries,
have jumped nationally from
$3.21 last year to $5.74 on Friday, a
record, according to GasBuddy,
which tracks fuel prices.
These higher energy prices
seep into almost every major part
of the economy. They drive up the
costs for electricity, transporta-
tion, shipping, logistics, air travel,
agriculture, fertilizer and the pro-
duction of other commodities.
They cut into corporate earnings:
Walmart recently pointed to fuel
and storage spikes as hurting its
profits. Demand for natural gas is
soaring globally to make up for
Russian energy, and as a result so
is demand for U.S. natural gas,
creating new financial strains for
domestic manufacturers and the
nation’s power grid — just as
more and more Americans start


GAS PRICES FROM A


for roughly 3 percent of consum-
ers’ annual spending before the
pandemic began, according to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Unlike
the 1970s, America is now a sig-
nificant producer of global en-
ergy supply — meaning high pric-
es benefit U.S. energy producers,
rather than simply strain domes-
tic household costs, as firms can
increase hiring and spending
with their higher revenue. Busi-
nesses are also less vulnerable to
volatility in gas and oil prices
than they once were, due in part
to improved efficiency over the
last several decades, according to
Matthew J. Slaughter, an econo-
mist at Dartmouth College.
Economic growth has re-
mained strong in the United
States since shortly after early
pandemic closures were lifted,
and policymakers have hoped de-
mand would cool, as inflation is
way up with the fastest increases
in consumer prices in roughly
four decades. Higher spending on
energy could, some economists

hope, deplete demand in other
sectors, allowing for other price
pressures to ease. That might
hurt in the short term, but it
could help overall.
“It sounds harsh to say, but we
need a slowdown in aggregate
demand,” Slaughter said. “And it’s
not that large relative to other
things in the consumption bas-
ket.”
But even as higher gas prices
help slow the economy and tame
inflation, they’re also squeezing
politicians. And lawmakers and
the Biden administration are des-
perate to reverse the trend. The
White House has taken a range of
actions aimed at easing the gas
price crunch, such as committing
to releasing 1 million barrels a day
from the nation’s Strategic Petro-
leum Reserve and deploying the
Defense Production Act to en-
courage production of critical
minerals. The White House has
also permitted a gasoline blend
composed in part by ethanol to be
sold over the summer despite

resistance from environmental
groups, which argue the move
will worsen air pollution.
The president is also reported-
ly planning a trip to Saudi Arabia,
as the U.S. looks to other parts of
the world for increasing oil pro-
duction to reduce global depend-
ence on Russia, the world’s third-
largest oil supplier before the war
in Ukraine. President Biden had
once vowed to make Saudi Arabia
a “pariah,” given its treatment of
women and other human rights
abuses. But the White House has
defended the potential trip, both
to help broker diplomatic talks in
the Middle East and to increase
oil production. The U.S. govern-
ment has also tried to work with
Venezuela and other oil pro-
ducers on increasing supply since
Russia’s war began.
White House officials have
grown frustrated, though, as their
efforts to this point have been
confounded by global forces.
E arlier this month, a group of
oil-producing nations known as
OPEC Plus announced that they
had committed to a bigger boost
in production for this summer —
a move quickly praised by the
Biden administration. Internally,
White House officials hoped the
announcement would lead to a
drop in oil prices, two people
familiar with the matter said.
Instead, prices continued to rise.
“They were perplexed that

there wasn’t a more durable reac-
tion,” said one person briefed by
White House officials, speaking
on the condition of anonymity to
describe private conversations.
“They were like, ‘Man, we can’t
catch a break.’ ”
Biden on Friday blamed large
oil and gas companies for not
doing more to increase produc-
tion, accusing them of choosing
profits over lower prices for
Americans. “They’re not drilling.
Why aren’t they drilling? Because
they make more money not pro-
ducing more oil,” Biden said. “The
price goes up.”
The Post-Schar School poll
found 72 percent of Americans
blamed corporations for trying to
increase profits for rising gas
prices, including 86 percent of
Democrats, 52 percent of Repub-
licans and 76 percent of indepen-
dents. The overall figure blaming
corporations was higher than the
share who blamed Biden or dis-
ruptions caused by the pandemic
(both 58 percent) and about the
same share who blamed Russia’s
invasion of Ukraine (69 percent).
Biden has stopped short of
embracing some of the actions
pushed by Democratic allies in
Congress to target oil producers.
Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse
(D-R.I.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-
Mass.) have pushed a tax on the
profits of oil and gas firms that
would return revenue to consum-
ers, with similar measures al-
ready enacted by the United
Kingdom, Italy and some other
European countries.
“U.S. policymakers should
quickly follow suit or risk contin-
ued profiteering and pain at the
pump,” said Lindsay Owens, exec-
utive director of the Groundwork
Collaborative, a left-leaning
group. The Groundwork Collab-
orative found that the largest 24
oil and gas companies recorded
$174 billion in profits last year —
the highest increase in seven
years.
The White House has said it is
studying that approach, as em-
bracing such a measure could
give the administration an effec-
tive political response to higher
gas prices. But it would lead to a
fierce blowback from industry,
centrist economists and the GOP.
Critics warn that taxing oil and
gas companies would discourage
them from increasing produc-
tion, which in the long run could
hurt prices.
Bob McNally, an energy analyst
at Rapidan Energy Group who
served in the George W. Bush
administration, said the White
House has no options that would
immediately improve the gas
price crunch. He said it is critical
that Biden avoid embracing solu-
tions such as price caps and an oil
profits tax that he said would
make the problem worse.
“The White House has two
options: They can do symbolic
things that don’t really lower
prices, and they can do really
dumb things that are counterpro-
ductive,” McNally said. “Despite
my many reservations about the
president’s energy policies, it is
nonetheless impressive that he
has so far resisted reaching into
the dumb basket.”

Gas hits $5 a gallon, vexing consumers and White House


SPENCER PLATT/GETTY IMAGES

GAYA GUPTA/THE WASHINGTON POST

ABOVE: A dealership in New
York City. Higher fuel prices
are often a harbinger of an
economic downturn, as
consumers respond to higher
prices by reducing their
spending on other goods and
services. L EFT: A customer in
Northeast Washington pays
$5.39 per gallon.

“I’d be on high alert

right now to see if the

economy succumbs to

this latest stab in the

heart from higher

energy prices.”
Chris Rupkey, chief economist
at Fwdbonds
Free download pdf