Mikhailov, Red (1968-75)]. We plan to
continue in this way, focusing on depth
and texture. The Museum of Modern Art
in New York began integrating its pho-
tographic collection in the same way,
which shows that our approach is a good
one,” Baker says.
The Tate has nonetheless played
catch-up in building up its photogra-
phy collection; it now has at least 5,000
photographic works. “In the past seven
years, we’ve built up a definitive collec-
tion of post-war Japanese photography.
Last year, there were photography shows
across all four Tate museums [including
Nick Waplington/Alexander McQueen:
Working Process at Tate Britain].” The
aim is to show a full retrospective by a
living photographer at Tate Britain, as
“this would send out a really important
message. I expect it to happen very soon.”
Baker says that the Tate is collecting
broadly in a “research-led way”, looking
in depth at Eastern Europe. “There are
some incredible works from Poland
dating from the 1960 and 1970s. We are
also focusing on South-East Asia and
Latin America,” Baker says.
He insists, though, that he will not
duplicate major UK photography col-
lections such as the Victoria and Albert
Museum and the National Portrait Gallery
in London, or even European collections
such as the Centre Pompidou in Paris. “I
think it’s interesting that curators at insti-
tutions in New York might be acquiring
the same things. We have to be sensible
regarding what we acquire,” Baker adds.
Acquiring major works is, however,
always a headache for cash-strapped
public institutions. Baker admits that the
market is challenging in certain areas.
“Updating our Cindy Sherman holdings
would, for instance, pose a significant
challenge,” he says.
According to the Tate annual report
for 2015/16, the photography acquisitions
committee, comprising key patrons and
philanthropists, helped acquire a group
of images by Sirkka-Liisa Konttinen of
Finland and five works by the UK artist
John Hilliard. The film producer Michael
Wilson and the London-based collector
Jack Kirkland are among the members of
the photography acquisitions committee.
“We cannot specify the budget for
photography acquisitions but can say
that, in the past five years, we have made
major acquisitions way beyond what
we expected through not only the pho-
tography [acquisition] committee, but
also through the other Tate acquisition
committees, such as the Latin American
committee,” Baker says.
“We’ve had to really think about
how we collect, which is why we have
built strong relationships with collec-
tors,” he adds; in 2012, Eric and Louise
Franck donated 1,400, mainly 20th-cen-
tury works by photographers such as Bill
Brandt. “These kinds of gifts are playing
a huge role.”
Gareth Harris
4 THE ART NEWSPAPER SECTION 2 Number 284, November 2016
SPECIAL REPORT
PHOTOGRAPHY
Tate makes up for lost time
ACQUISITIONS
London. Since Simon Baker joined
the Tate in 2009 as the first curator
of photography, the gallery has over-
hauled how it collects and presents
photographic works, addressing what
he describes as “one giant gap” in the
national collection of Modern and con-
temporary art. The Tate established a
photography acquisition committee
the following year to help build strong
relationships with leading collectors,
which is paying of with important gifts
and loans. In November more than 150
loans from Elton John’s collection go on
show in The Radical Eye (10 November-7
May 2017) at Tate Modern: a coup for its
curators of photography. Discussions
are ongoing with the musician and his
husband David Furnish about making
some, as yet unspecified, key pieces from
their collection available to the British
public on a more permanent basis.
“The strategy has been to collect
broadly and in-depth,” Baker says. “The
plan involves fitting the photography
collection into the broader collection
of art, rather than establishing a sepa-
rate photography department. This has
proved very successful: walk around
Tate Modern and you can see photos
everywhere. They’re now embedded in
the collection.” Photography is now on
a par with other media at the Tate, he
adds, which should please purists. “More
than ten years ago, you’d see a work by
Andreas Gursky going up the escalators
at Tate Modern. That has all changed;
photography is no longer outside the gal-
leries.” There were photographic prints
in the recent Georgia O’Keeffe show
(closed 30 October), for instance.
“Photographic works also feature in
the Living Cities display in the Switch
House extension [including Boris
Over the past 20 years, the London dealer
James Hyman and his wife Claire have assem-
bled a private collection of more than 3,000
images by European and US photographers
spanning the entire history of the medium.
They are also the most active buyers of
British photography in the world and are in
the process of putting their British collection
online at britishphotography.org. Hyman
is considering the future of their British
photography collection and is in talks with
museums to donate the extraordinary cache.
The Art Newspaper: Why did you launch
the website?
James Hyman: Some of the best photogra-
phy today is being done in this country but
it is not being supported as much as it could
be by British institutions or private collectors.
When I take part in fairs such as Paris
Photo or AIPAD in New York, I sell a lot of
British photography to American museums;
curators there recognise the quality and
appreciate that the work is, from a global
perspective, underpriced. So I sell far more
British photography to museums around the
world than to any institution in this country
because curators here aren’t so engaged with
the work. The website is part of our attempt
to spread the word internationally and to
make a private collection more public.
The UK has always lagged behind the rest
of the world in the appreciation of pho-
tography. Is the situation improving?
What we lack here is someone promoting
our own photographers at an institutional
level. Simon Baker is the curator of interna-
tional photography at Tate Modern and he’s
very interested in developments in Japan.
That’s ine but what I’ve been campaigning
for is a senior curator of British photography
at Tate Britain.
Tate has two hurdles in trying to build its
photography collection. The irst is: do they
have the funding for a senior curator of Brit-
ish photography? It’s not enough to simply
give the job to an existing Tate curator with
little knowledge of photography. Secondly,
the institutional view of photography has
been iltered through the lens of conceptual
art. So it’s ine if you’re Richard Long or
Gilbert & George, who are seen as artists
using photography. But when it comes to
great British photographers such as Bill
Brandt, Bert Hardy, Roger Mayne, Tony
Ray-Jones or a host of wonderful contem-
porary photographers, Tate has never really
understood the work. This aects their col-
lecting, especially of historic photographs.
They have bought too many works that
were printed later and not enough original
vintage prints. They have focused too much
on the image, not the historical object.
If Tate Britain were to hire a photography
curator, would you consider giving your
collection to them?
It’s complicated. I’ve had a number of
conversations with [departing Tate director]
Nicholas Serota. He is personally engaged
but he explained that his senior colleagues
are not interested. With a new head of Tate
Britain, Alex Farquharson, and Serota’s own
imminent departure, it will be interesting
to see if things change. Also, I think that if
you donate to them, they do not respect
the work as much as if they’ve had to buy
it. My gallery represents a fantastic painter,
Michael Andrews of the School of London.
When he died, his archive was donated to
Tate. They’ve had it for 16 years but they’ve
still not catalogued it. Their funding priorities
are such that they don’t seem to be able to
catalogue what they already have.
Tragically, the institutions in this country
are in demise. The Library of Birmingham has
ired key curators looking after its acclaimed
photography department and severely
curtailed access to it. The National Media Mu-
seum in Bradford is transferring over 300,000
photographs to the V&A and the space it
opened at the Science Museum in London in
2013 is rumoured to be closing after it com-
pletes its planned exhibition schedule. [The
Science Museum says: “there is no question of
the Media Space gallery closing, however we
haven’t yet made irm decisions on what will
be programmed there in 2018 and beyond.”]
They have good curators at the V&A but the
photography department there is small and
badly funded, and they don’t even have the
money to catalogue what they’ve already got.
[The V&A says it has catalogued 90% of its
photography collection and that these records
are available on its online database.]
Also, I believe in a global culture, so I
would rather my collection stayed intact and
went somewhere abroad. It’s going to be
a commitment for a museum; we’re more
active collectors of British photography than
any public institution in the world. We buy
100 or 150 works at a time—entire exhibitions
such as recent touring shows of the work
of Anna Fox and Daniel Meadows. I would
love for this work to be seen abroad and for
our collection to become a way to promote
British photography internationally.
Interview by Cristina Ruiz KERTÉSZ: THE SIR ELTON JOHN PHOTOGRAPHY COLLECTION; © ESTATE OF ANDRÉ KERTÉSZ; COURTESY OF BRUCE SILVERSTEIN GALLERY, NEW YORK. HYMANS: © ADRIAN POPE
ELTON JOHN’S EYE FOR
MODERNIST PHOTOGRAPHY
“The Tate has never organised an exhibition
focusing exclusively on early 20th-century
photography,” says Shoair Mavlian, an assis-
tant curator at Tate Modern and co-curator
of The Radical Eye: Modernist Photography
from the Sir Elton John Collection (10 No-
vember-7 May 2017).
“The show features more than 70 artists,
ranging from well-known names such as Man
Ray to lesser known igures such as the US
photographer Margaret de Patta,” Mavlian
says. The timeframe of the exhibition runs
from around 1920 to 1950, with thematic
sections focusing on areas such as portraiture,
still-life and experiments. The exhibition also
highlights innovations such as photomontage
and double exposure.
The show includes mainly vintage prints.
“But in some cases, these are the irst known
print made by the photographer, such as André
Kertész’s Underwater Swimmer (1917), which is
the original contact print,” Mavlian says.
John told Tate Etc. magazine that
Kertész’s photograph “blew me away”. When
he saw the image and photographs by Man
Ray and Edward Quigley, John learned that
“these artists were able to do things that I
thought only a painter could do.” G.H.
Why a collection of British photography is probably going abroad
“The plan involves
itting the photography
collection into the broader
collection of art”
Lack of support from UK institutions could mean that James and Claire Hyman donate vast collection elsewhere
With help from Elton
John and other collectors,
photography is coming in
from the cold
André Kertész’s Underwater Swimmer
(1917) is in Elton John’s collection
James and Claire Hyman have a private
collection of 3,000 images