The_Art_Newspaper_-_November_2016

(Michael S) #1

THE ART NEWSPAPER SECTION 2 Number 284, November 2016 21


HEAD: COURTESY OF THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD/BRIDGEMAN IMAGES


Small but


perfectly


formed


A complete historical


catalogue of the


Wallace Collection’s


Italian sculptures.


By Susan Jenkins


ART HISTORY


I


n 2011, the Getty Foundation
launched an ambitious aca-
demic experiment conceived
by the late Natalie Kampen
as part of the Connecting Art
Histories initiative. A group
of mainly junior researchers from
difering backgrounds and disciplines
was recruited for a “roving seminar”
devoted to re-examining and debating
the comparatively neglected subject of
art in Rome’s provinces “in the field”.
The provinces of the Roman Empire
ofer plenty of scope for roving. At their
greatest extent they encompassed the
area of more than 30 modern nation
states, from Britain to Egypt, Portugal
to Syria. In every part of this territory
we find the physical traces of a Roman
material culture that, despite its
great variety, exhibits an astonishing
degree of technical and iconographical
homogeneity. Under the conditions of
Roman rule, the artistic traditions of
Italy and the urban centres of the Medi-
terranean, themselves largely inherited
from the Greek world, became a
common visual language for a vast
provincial population. The shared
imagery of statues, figural reliefs, wall
paintings, domestic mosaics, coins,
ceramics and so on might seem to have
united the Empire even more efec-
tively than actual language. The fact
that the execution of Roman-style mon-
uments often appears crude or idiosyn-
cratic—provincial, in fact—only serves

to strengthen the impression of Roman
art as a cohesive repertoire, even if
recent, revisionist research has more
or less outlawed the concept of Rome
itself as a cultural centre “Romanising”
its provincial peripheries.
In the event, two regions—Britain
and Greece—were chosen to host the
Getty seminars and associated field
trips, although the interests of the
international participants represented
the whole geographical breadth of the
Empire. Beyond Boundaries: Con-
necting Visual Cultures in the Prov-
ince of Ancient Rome is the beautiful
and carefully edited outcome of their
deliberations over two years. The title
implies the crossing of the political
boundaries of the Empire, insofar
as these can be said to have existed.
Indeed, one of the most interesting
contributions is by the Indian art histo-
rian Naman Ahuja, who reassesses the
identity of Gandharan Buddhist sculp-
tures within the complex, globalised
world they shared with Roman art. But
his inclusion in the project also demon-
strates the organisers’ determination
to cross conceptual and disciplinary
boundaries, and to mount a fundamen-
tal challenge to entrenched assump-
tions about the nature of Roman art. In
this aim, the book is largely successful.
Its 19 papers include a mixture of his-
toriographical discussions, provocative
arguments, theoretical reflections,
and more empirical case studies. They
cover sculpture, coinage, metalwork,
architecture and sites of religious
ritual. There is a refreshing departure
from the sometimes over-simple
post-colonial models that have recently
become something of a new orthodoxy
in anglophone scholarship on the
Roman provinces. For example, there
are no heavy-handed attacks on the
idea of Romanisation (instead, a subtle

and acute analysis of “the R-word” and
its alternatives in Maria Papaioannou’s
discussion of Roman Greece). That
is not to say that the advances made
by such approaches have not been
acknowledged; indeed, they have pro-
foundly informed the Getty project.
Not all the papers are equally inno-
vative or productive, and occasionally
their evocation of anthropological or
archaeological theory seems to promise
more than it truly delivers (there is a
fair bit of network theory and a lot of
“entanglement”). Notwithstanding this,
the book is consistently interesting and
thought provoking. It is particularly
stimulating when papers disagree
with each other, allowing the reader to
glimpse, perhaps, some of the dialogue
that went on in the seminars them-
selves. For instance, Steven Hijman’s
attempt to present diferences of style
and technical quality in sculpture as
a matter of “consciously semantic
deployment” is in pleasing tension
with Dragana Mladenovic’s combat-
ive recognition of “bad art” in Upper
Moesian stelae.
If the volume has a common
message, it is about the sheer diversity
and richness of ideas and insights that
can be derived from taking provincial
art seriously and interpreting it in
both its local and its global, empire-
wide contexts (a “glocal” dynamic,
as Carlos Noreña calls it in his essay
on Antiochene coinage). Between the
traditional narratives of Romanisation
and resistance, such an approach has
been all too rarely applied to the art of
Rome’s provinces.


  • Peter Stewart is the director of the
    Classical Art Research Centre and a lecturer
    in classical art and archaeology at the
    University of Oxford. His publications
    include The Social History of Roman Art
    (Cambridge University Press, 2008)


Beyond Boundaries: Connecting
Visual Cultures in the Province
of Ancient Rome
Susan Alcock, Mariana Egri and
James Frakes, eds
Getty Publications, 408pp, $69.95 (hb)

FINE


EUROPEAN


ART


December 7, 2016 | Dallas | Live & Online
Browse All Lots on HA.com/5278

Inquiries: 877-HERITAGE (437-4824)
Marianne Berardi, Ph.D. | Ext. 1506 | [email protected]
Ariana Hartsock | Ext. 1283 | [email protected]

Paul César Helleu (French, 1859-1927)
Madame Helleu aboard the yacht ‘Bird’
Oil on canvas
23 x 25-1/2 inches
Estimate: $200,000-$300,000

Paul R. Minshull #16591. BP 12-25%; see HA.com 42781

Always Accepting Quality Consignments in 40 Categories

A Roman copper-alloy
head (around AD180-
200) of the Emperor
Marcus Aurelius, from
Northamptonshire, in
a style that relects
Celtic metalworking
traditions

SCULPTURE


Jeremy Warren’s recent contribution
to the series of sumptuous catalogues
published by the Wallace Collection
is beautifully designed and produced,
with spectacular photographs by
Cassandra Parsons. Warren, formerly
the collections and academic director
at the Wallace Collection and now
an emeritus research fellow there,
explains how its 159 works document
the collecting eforts in the field of
Italian sculpture from around 1740
to around 1890 of five generations of
the Seymour-Conway family.
This comprehensive two-volume
Catalogue of Italian Sculpture
enjoys meticulous scholarship and
is the “first serious reappraisal of
the Wallace sculpture collection as
a whole for some 85 years”, treating
one third of the entire holdings and
replacing Sir James Mann’s catalogue
of 1931. Warren explains that he has
taken a geographical approach to the
objects, cataloguing all works by the
same artist in the same place, thus
the probable origin of a cast dictates
whether or not the sculpture has
been included.
Sir Richard Wallace (1818-90) was
not the only family member to pur-
chase sculpture, but Warren under-
standably focuses on his guiding
influence as he had a “transforma-
tive” efect on the family collection
which saw him end “his life with a
collection of sculpture that... reflected
his own taste”. The personal nature
of the collection is emphasised in
the charming photograph of around
1885-88 showing Sir Richard in his
smoking costume, holding one of his
acquisitions, believed to be a bronze
statuette of The Flagellation of Christ.
Sir Richard was responsible for
the quality and breadth of acquisi-
tions, which ranged from Renais-
sance bronze statuettes, utensils
and medals, to door knockers and

plaquettes. His surprise inheritance
in 1870 ensured that he was able to
put his personal stamp on the works
acquired, redoubling his active con-
noisseurship in the auction rooms
and occasional purchases of major
collections.
As with every collection that
reflects the personal tastes of its
founder, there are strengths and
weaknesses. Wallace was an avid
collector of coins and medals. His
eye for outstanding Renaissance
bronzes saw him acquire some of the
finest early examples, including the
“brilliantly fluid portrait from life” of
a cleric, probably Antonio Trombetta,
by Andrea Riccio (around 1506-16)
and a beautiful piece of a Seated
Woman (around 1480-90) by Giovanni
Fonduli da Crema. There were sig-
nificant acquisitions in other media
too, including a boxwood Hercules
(around 1520) by Francesco Pomarano,
“the most important small wooden
figure sculpture to survive from the
earlier Italian Renaissance”, to which
Warren has appended new documen-
tation relating to the maker.
The weaknesses in the collection
reflect the areas where Wallace
did not seek to make purchases. He
did not acquire Greek or Roman
antiquities, for instance, nor was he
interested in buying many marbles or
terracottas. But there are outstanding
exceptions, such as Pietro Torrigiani’s
marble Head of Christ (around 1516-
20), originally from the west side of
Westminster Abbey’s Jesus or Islip
Chapel in the north transept, which
was conserved and redisplayed as a
result of research for the catalogue.
There can be no doubt that the
Wallace Collection’s new catalogue
was a labour of love for the scholarly
sculpture connoisseur, Jeremy
Warren. He has succeeded in his
mission to explain that Sir Richard
Wallace’s “deepest love was the arts
of the Renaissance” and his hope
“that this catalogue will demonstrate
just how great [his] achievement was
in building a collection of mainly
Renaissance Italian sculpture which
though numerically relatively small,
contains so many works of art of
outstanding quality and interest” has
been fulfilled.


  • Susan Jenkins is a curator and researcher
    who has written extensively on 17th- and
    18th-century decorative and fine arts


Glocal dynamics


versus the R-word


Roman art shared a common visual repertory throughout the Empire, but there


were significant variations in local styles. By Peter Stewart


The Wallace Collection
Catalogue of Italian Sculpture
Jeremy Warren
Paul Holberton Publishing, 846pp,
2 vols, £250 (hb)
Free download pdf