Classic Car Mart - Spring 2016_

(nextflipdebug5) #1

"Like the Metro, the late model Mini is a blend of the new and


familiar, the big chunky seats being the most noticeable feature"


Red seat piping complementing the colour of the carpets and seatbelt webbings were all standard MG Metro trademarks. A more naturally positioned steering


wheel and less offset pedals were a huge improvement over the classic Mini's set up, as was the useful large rear hatch and folding rear seat back.


48 Classic Car Mart Spring 2016


over the original it was abandoned, the


compromise being the development of the more


mildly modified A-Plus engine.


Underneath the new car though, the brief


was to give the new supermini a ride to equal


much larger cars and to that end the Hydragas


system was installed instead of the Mini’s


bouncy rubber cones. The fluid suspension


also came with packaging advantages which


the designers took advantage of to create a


spacious interior for the new car.


Development was rushed. In fact, as new


chairman Michael Edwardes discovered during


a management ride and drive in 1978, rather


too rushed. Compared with the opposition


from VW and Ford, ADO88 was judged to be


unrefined and utilitarian but with insufficient


time to begin again, a programme of detail


improvements was established which brought


victory from the jaws of defeat.


The rather van-like styling of the ADO88 (early


prototypes look a bit like a larger Lancia Y10)


was revised with every panel changed and the


tailgate made less vertical, emerging from the


process with a neat, thoroughly modern shape


which would prove timeless.


The name was changed at this point from


ADO88 to LC8 (for Leyland Cars) and the Austin


miniMetro was launched in October 1980.


Marketed as ‘The British car to beat the world’


the Metro was an immediate success despite the


labour relations issues at Longbridge.


Initially the line-up consisted of just the 998cc


and 1275cc engines with the range-topper being


the 1.3HLS but a go-faster version was already


on the cards. No sooner had the Metro been


launched than the tuners of the day were having


a go applying their decades of Mini fettling


experience to the new car. I can remember


reading the special issue of Autocar which


included Metros breathed on by Janspeed, Turbo


Technics, Wood & Pickett, Tickford and of course


John Cooper which renamed its own version


Monaco after trademark disputes.


No doubt taking inspiration from some of


these, the MG Metro rolled in on its pepperpot


alloys in May 1982, its red seatbelts trumpeting


the return of the MG brand, the Abingdon plant


having been axed only the previous year. The


powerplant was the same 1275cc A-Plus unit


found in the 1.3HLS but essentially to Mini


Cooper spec with a hotter cam, big-valve head


and bigger carb. The result was 72bhp and with


the Metro weighing in at only 800kg performance


was definitely in warm hatch territory: 0-60mph


in 11.3 seconds and a 101mph maximum.


With its bold MG side stripes and alloy


wheels, the MG Metro is actually more


extrovert than the original Cooper and in


standard form the Metro’s throaty exhaust note


is much more noticeable. As someone who


started their driving career in the ’80s I can


still tell the sound of an MG Metro apart from


an Escort XR3i several miles away.


Driving an MG Metro today is a curious


combination of surprisingly modern and old-


school Mini. The Metro dramatically improved


on the classic Mini’s driving position with a more


conventional steering wheel position and the offset


of the pedals reduced, but as soon as you turn


the key the soundtrack is all very familiar, from the


drop gear whine to the A-Series engine note.


Much work was apparently done on the


gearshift during the Metro’s life in order to reduce


its rubbery quality but one thing which couldn’t be


changed was the lack of a fifth gear, a legacy of


that carry-over Mini drivetrain. At launch it seemed


a minor issue and certainly the extra torque of


the MG version was enough to do without that


extra ratio, but as time went on the Metro was


handicapped more and more in the marketplace


against more modern five-speed competition.


From standstill, the MG Metro feels agreeably


lively, revving more eagerly than the original


Coopers, with the carb-fed engine offering more


immediate throttle response than that produced


by many brand new performance hatches.


One thing which is immediately noticeable


in urban driving is the ride quality of the Metro


which is a world away from the rubber-sprung


classic Minis and which endeared it to many


customers in its early ’80s heyday. Like many of


the best performance cars, the MG proves that


a rock-hard ride isn’t crucial to decent handling


and although it’s firmer than the shopping Metro


models, it’s still very civilised. As for handling,

Free download pdf