Stamp & Coin Mart - April 2016_

(Tina Sui) #1
http://www.stampandcoin.co.uk APRIL 2016^25

T

he first stamp
columnist
to criticise
the GPO
was probably
writing with a quill. Since
then, they’ve been an easy
target for scribblers in this business: you
just look at the stamps, find something to
criticise and let fly with the invective.
Did we really need two sets of stamps for
the Wembley Exhibition? And as for the
PUC set! Low values that look like beer
bottle labels and a top value of £1? Do
they think we’re made of money?
Now, it’s Royal Mail who take the flak,
especially when they announce the next
year’s stamp programme. This year will
see fourteen commemorative sets and
three sets of Post and Go stamps. God
knows what the total cost will be, but
every year, the columnists criticise and the
collectors complain, and the new issues
just keep on coming.

So what’s different now?
Firstly, there’s a new issues policy and there’s
taking the mick. Not content with sets
of six to eight stamps and face values of
£2+, we now find the same designs spread
across a wide range of different products,
many of them recent inventions, like
stamp souvenirs, stamp souvenir sheets and
generic sheets. That’s on top of the retail
stamp books, stamp cards and FDCs etc.
So the total ‘product portfolio’ for the 2015

Christmas Stamps cost £105.94.
By selling Royal Mail, we gave a private,
profit-making company a license to print money
and they have been making full use of it.
Secondly, real world usage of postage
stamps has been declining for some time.
This means that there are decreasing
opportunities for using up all the surplus
stocks of commemoratives that have built
up over the years. And this is driving resale
values down. Dealers’ buying prices for
unmounted decimal issues are advertised in
the Philatelic Exporter and Stamp & Coin
Mart, where in December 2015, the buying
price of stamp collections from 1971-2015
was sixty percent of their face value. For ‘face
value’ read ‘purchase price.’ A modern GB
stamp collection could be depreciating faster
than a new car.

Stemming the flood
Both collectors and dealers have been saying
‘that’s enough’. Especially those collectors
whose goal was completion but who found

the cost was simply too high to contemplate.
Among the dealers, Robert Murray’s stamp
shop in Edinburgh stopped handling new
issues in 2009 and the business has not suffered
as a result. A stamp shop is expected to stock
the new issues in depth and that means stamps,
miniature sheets, FDCs, and all the other spin-
offs: this tied up a lot of capital in items which
were not all that profitable to sell. Now, that
money is available to invest in stocks of older,
more interesting material.

Of course, Royal Mail can see this as
clearly as anyone else. They also know the
law of diminishing returns. So they must
be aware that eventually, collectors will
start to pick and choose, or stop buying
new issues altogether, or switch to other
times or other countries.

Are they concerned?
In a letter published in a recent issue of
trade magazine Philatelic Exporter, Matt
Parkes, Royal Mail’s Director of Stamps
and Collectibles, states that they are
‘currently developing a new strategy with
the intention of reducing the cost to the
collector, whilst supporting the hobby by
appealing to new customers... We have
had a recent change in management and
reducing the cost of the hobby is a key
priority’. They state they will be taking
appropriate advice from the stamp trade in
the implementation of this policy.
They also intend to develop more
alternative products, presumably like the
cufflinks, framed stamps, mugs and toys
which fill their gift catalogues. These bear no
relation to philately but gain a priceless cachet
by their association with the Queen’s stamps.
But is this a genuine conversion or
another false dawn? Will we return to an
1980s style new issues policy or will the
lure of the printing presses prove too much?
What hope is there for the thousands of
people who would like to collect the stamps
of their own country, but who also need to
buy food?
I think the only people who can really
tip the balance are catalogue producers like
Stanley Gibbons, by declaring that some
GB commemorative issues are in excess of
operational requirements and denying them
a full listing, which would mean no spaces in
printed albums and no sales to collectors. This
would at least demonstrate to Royal Mail how
important the collectors’ market really is.
So. How about it, Stanley?

Will we return to an 1980s style new


issues policy or will the lure of the


printing presses prove too much?


Opinion


Share your views on the Stamp & Coin Mart facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/stampandcoinmartmagazine
Opinion

Reining in Royal Mail


For years collectors of modern GB have been complaining about the increasing number of
commemoraitve stamp issues, but finally Royal Mail seem to be taking notice, prompting David Bailey to
wonder if the torrent of new issues is finally going to stop

p25 opinion.indd 25 01/03/2016 11:17

Free download pdf