Acosta-Rodríguezet al., Science 376 , 1192–1202 (2022) 10 June 2022 6of11
ACAging_DEUpDownSameAL14%
4%CR.spread7%
3%CR.day.2h7%
3%CR.day.12h6%
2%CR.night.2h2%
2%CR.night.12h5%
3%B71%29%Up/D
ow
nNSAny FeedingAL down (339)6 (25%)21 (7%)25 (7%)19 (9%)6 (43%)12 (17%)46 (6%)46 (6%)46 (6%)21 (13%)aromatic amino acid...small molecule catabolic...reg of hormone levelsorganic acid catabolic...homocysteine metab...α−amino acid catabolic ...organic acid metab...oxoacid metab...carboxylic acid metab...α−amino acid metab ...04
−log10(adjp)63 total termsGO:BPAL up (894)53 (10%)104 (10%)113 (10%)70 (12%)69 (13%)179 (10%)86 (12%)70 (13%)68 (14%)100 (13%)innate immune resp...resp to external biotic...defense responselymphocyte activationinflammatory responseimmune system processleukocyte activationreg of cytokine prod...reg of cell activationcell activation08
−log10(adjp)948 total termsDE8 (2%)9 (2%)11 (2%)3 (15%)14 (3%)23 (2%)24 (2%)adaptive immune res..T cell activationlymphocyte activ...antigen processinginnate immune res..immune responseresp to external bio...02 4 6
−log10(adjp)GO:BPCR
protectionLifespan+ Fasting
(day or night)Lifespan+ Circadian
alignmentLifespan012012012−3−2−1010123−10AL
CR.night 12h
CR.night 2h
CR.day 12h
CR.day 2h
Aging LFC CR.spread0120101201Aging LFCAL CR.spread CR.day 2h CR.night 12h CR.night 2hCR.day 12h01−10−2−10Aging LFC^012AL CR.spread CR.day 2h CR.night 12h CR.night 2hCR.day 12h−606−6 −6 0 606−6 0 6 −606−6 −6 0 606−6 −6 0 606−6 0 6Log2FC CRLog2 FC_ALR = 0.44
p = 2.2 e-16R = 0.55
p = 2.2 e-16R = 0.46
p = 2.2 e-16R = 0.47
p = 2.2 e-16R = 0.11
p = 2.2 e-16CR.spread CR.day.2hCR.day.12h CR.night.2hCR.night.12h100 total terms10 (9%)cold−induced thermog... 8 (7%)reg of cold−induced... 8 (7%)temp homeostasisadaptive thermogenesis0 12
−log10(adjp)10 (7%)4 total termsGO:BPFig. 4. CR ameliorates age-related changes in liver gene expression
observed under AL conditions.(A) Schematic comparison of differential
gene expression between young and old mice in the six feeding conditions.
Circles show the percentage of genes that are unchanged between young
and aged mice (gray), increased in aged mice (red), and decreased in aged
mice (blue). Pie chart on the right shows the percentage of genes susceptible
for age-related changes in any feeding condition. (B) Spearman correlation
plots comparing changes in gene expression between the aging DE genes
between AL and CR groups (aging DE genes are defined here as the
4077 genes that change with age in any of the six feeding conditions tested).
(C) Schematic representation of genes that are protected from age-related
changes in every CR group (left) with GO terms of those significantly up-
regulated (middle) or down-regulated (right) in aged AL mice. Represented
are 10 nonredundant of the top 25 most significant enriched terms. Examples
of age-related fold changes (log 2 FC ± SE) in gene expression are shown
below for all feeding conditions. Gray-shaded areas indicate FC < 1.5
considered as not significant change. (D andE) Schematic representation,
GO, and representative genes that maintain similar levels between young
and old ages due to fasting (day or night) (D) and circadian alignment of
feeding and fasting cycles (E).RESEARCH | RESEARCH ARTICLE