Motor Boat & Yachting — February 2018

(Greg DeLong) #1
16

Who is tampering with antifoul,
and why?
European regulations for antifouling
are changing, mostly with regards to
biocides, the active ingredients that
seek to control organic fouling by
chemical or biological means. In the
case of boating, that means the weed,
slime, barnacles and other organisms
that build up on underwater surfaces
such as a boat’s hull and sterngear.
The reason they are changing is
concern over the long-term build-
up of chemicals leaching into the
environment and the damage that
could have on animal and plant life.

When is this due to take place?
According to the British Coatings
Federation, antifoul manufacturers
have had to submit a dossier for each
of its products before December 31,


  1. This requires the submission of
    information detailing the effectiveness,
    stability and possible human and
    environmental issues of the products
    used to one of the appointed EU
    authorities – in the UK’s case, it’s
    the Health and Safety Executive.


Can they carry on selling
antifouling in the meantime?
If an application has been made for
an antifouling paint and it has been
accepted by the authorities, then
this product can continue to be made,
supplied and used as before while
the dossier is being reviewed by the
authorities. There is no fixed timescale
for dossier evaluation, which may take
several years. Any paint for which
a dossier has not been submitted
or accepted can be sold until the
end of June 2018 and must be
used by December 2018. After
this date, the product will no longer
be permitted to be used in the EU.

Is this an issue for boat owners?
That depends on the effectiveness of
the new products. The fear is that new

regulations will limit the type and
concentration of chemicals used
reducing either their ability to keep
fouling at bay or their longevity.
If so, this may mean extra cost
and more frequent applications as
well as more regular lifts and scrubs.

Presumably this is deemed
necessary for the environment?
Of course any reduction in chemicals
entering the environment is in theory
a good thing. However, as ever, it is all
about getting the balance right. There
is some concern that new rules are
designed around the model of an
‘inside marina scenario’, ie a small
enclosed space with little tidal flow
in which chemicals are more likely

Will this apply to all vessels?
It will affect all leisure boats although
superyachts and commercial ships
fall under a separate antifouling
specification. The definition of
a superyacht is a leisure vessel
with a load line length equal to
or over 24m. In practice, this tends
to be boats over about 90ft in length.
The theory is that these vessels
are considered open water craft
and less likely to be in the confined
spaces occupied by smaller boats.

Is the new legislation fi xed?
It’s a fluid situation with some
trade organisations lobbying
for a more realistic test scenario.

What is the manufacturers’ take
on this proposed regulation?
We spoke to the research department
of International [Paint], which recently
launched eight new antifouling
products to replace existing ones.
The company claims that customers
who have been using Micron Extra EU
and Micron Extra 2 will see improved
performance from the new Micron


  1. That’s because Micron 350
    uses self-polishing copolymer
    technology that allows for a more
    evenly controlled biocide release rate.
    The other new products are said to
    perform in line with the products they
    replace but with improved colours.
    It claims that boats will not need to
    be cleaned more often, that there
    is no significant difference in the
    amount of product needing to be
    applied and that the duration of
    effectiveness should be similar.


Is Coppercoat also affected?
Coppercoat is slightly different,
being a water-based epoxy with
very low leach rates that is designed
to last for several years rather than
being applied annually. Currently,
the system is unaffected by new
Biocidal Product Regulations.

EU antifoul regulations


The truth about


Changes are afoot that could affect everyone who keeps a boat afl oat. MBY investigates


MBYINVESTIGATES


to build up. This may not be fully
representative of UK moorings,
many of which are flushed by river
or tidal currents, making the new
regulations overly draconian.
Then there is also the question
of unintended consequences.

Unintended consequences?
The most obvious consequence
is that less effective antifoul could
considerably increase hull drag
through the water, resulting in
increased fuel burn and higher
emissions. But beyond that, there
is the question of invasive species
being carried by boats to locations
in which they don’t belong if
antifouling is not sufficiently effective.

NEWS

An unintended consequence could be more hull
drag, increased fuel burn and higher emissions

Will the new EU
regulations reduce
the effi cacity of
antifouling paints?
Free download pdf