PART FOUR: RUDDERS AND STEERING SYSTEMS
custom fabricating and machining solid
aluminum rudder stocks of 6082. These can
be machined to any diameter desired and
tapered as well. Weight can be close to that
of carbon composite.
It is also worth considering whether such
a high-aspect rudder really pays. The differ-
ence in performance between a rudder with
an aspect ratio of 3 and one of 5 (of roughly
equal area) isn’t all that great. A lower aspect
ratio reduces the bending arm, which reduces
the bending moment, and so reduces the
required stock diameter as well as the stock
length, thereby reducing stock weight.
Checking Rudder-Stock
Strength Going Astern
Because forward speed is so much higher than
astern speed—for ordinary boats—simply
checking the rudder-stock strength in the
ahead condition is generally adequate. Some
craft, however, may have rudder configura-
tions that create greater loads when going
astern. This is because when making stern-
way, the center of water force or center of
pressure is about 20 percent of mean chord
forward of the trailing edge(which, going
backward, becomes the leading edge). This,
in turn, significantly increases the length of
the twisting arm, and so the twisting moment.
For displacement boats, use 70 percent of
maximum ahead speed as speed for sternway
calculations.
For planing hulls, use
Sternway, kts =(maximum forward speed,
kts +20) ÷ 3
If you’re in doubt about the rudder-stock
strength going astern, repeat all the previous
rudder-stock calculations, using the sternway
speed and locating the center of water force
20 percent of the mean chord forward of the
trailing edge.
Rudders Stocks with
Bearings Above and Below
the Rudder Blade
A rudder that is supported with bearings
both above and below the rudder blade, such
as in Figure 12-21, is in nearly pure torsion
with minimal bending. What bending exists
is the result of the side force of the water,
which is assumed to be distributed roughly
evenly along the height of the rudder. This
could be calculated as a “combined twisting
and bending” similar to what we did earlier,
but because the bending moment is such a
small proportion of the total load, this can
be taken care of simply by using the slightly
larger safety factor of 4, rather than 3. 34.
You could then use Formula 11-3 above for
combined twisting and bending with a zero
entered for bending arm and therefore
bending moment, but it’s more straightfor-
ward to use torque alone as simply
TM =rudder pressure center ×twisting arm
Along with a safety factor of 4 as in Table 11-1
In the combined twisting and bending of
the spade rudder, bending dominated, so we
used ultimate tensile strength (UTS). In the
current case, however, torsiondominates.
Accordingly, you need to use ultimate
shearstrength (USS), which can be taken
as 60 percent of UTS.
If we assume for a moment that our pre-
vious rudder was supported by a lower rudder
bearing on a strong skeg, then we would find
the required stock diameter as follows:
From Step 5 above:
TM =8,512 lb.× 3. 64 in. =30,984 in.-lb.
or
TM =3,839 kg× 0 .092 m =353 kgm
From Step 7 above:
Since the resulting stock will be consid-
erably smaller in this configuration, we’ll use
more standard 316L SS, with a UTS of 85,000
psi (586 MPa). Shear strength would then be
85,000 psi UTS× 0. 60 =51,000 psi USS
or
586 MPa UTS× 0. 60 =352 MPa USS
or
353 kgm× 9. 8066 =3,462 Nm
Dia.in.
16 30,984in.-lb.
51,000 psi
4SF
=
×
π⎛⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
=
3
8 2
2. 31 in.,use
23 //in.or 2^1 in. 31 16L stainless steel