106 MA XIMUMPC OCTOBER 2005
We tackle tough reader letters on...
PDream Machine ‘0 5 PUtility Software
PKonfabulator’s Newfound Freedom
LIVING THE COOL DREAM
After reading the Dream Machine story in September,
I was curious what kind of cooling you used in DMX?
Also, concerning the OS: I have too much soft-
ware to even consider repurchasing everything
when I upgrade to the 64-bit version of Windows
XP Pro. Can you comment on the DMX performance
with Windows 2000 Pro?
—Larry Voyer
ASSOCIATE EDITOR JOSH NOREM RESPONDS:
Though it’s normal and even expected that
an audacious PC will have an elaborate cool-
ing setup, we deviated from this practice and
used a very basic air-cooling setup for DMX,
for two reasons. First, the primary advantage
of a water-cooling setup is that it allows you to
achieve much better overclocking results than
are possible with air-cooling, given the lower CPU
temperatures. DMX’s workstation mother-
board negated the option of overclocking.
Second, we actually considered a water-
cooling setup just for giggles, but with all
the hardware in the rig, there wasn’t enough
room inside the case to mount a radiator/fan,
pump, reservoir, and all the tubing.
The CPU heatsink we used is a reference
cooler for the FX-55 processor made by AVC
(www.avc.com.tw). It uses a copper base
plate, aluminum fins, and four copper heat
pipes. We use this same heatsink/fan in our
zero-point test beds as well.
As for 64-bit Windows, your existing 32-
bit software should work on the new 64-bit
OS, so there’s likely no need to repurchase
your apps. If you’re going to run a machine
with 8GB of RAM, you need XP x64, other-
wise the OS (and applications running on
it) won’t see more than 3GB or so of your
memory. That would make the other 5GB of
RAM case warmers. We haven’t run Windows
2000 in the Lab in years, so we can’t really
comment on it.
WAS IT REALLY DUAL EVERYTHING?
I’m disappointed you missed one particular “dual”
option in Dream Machine ‘05.
I spend my lunch breaks figuring out what parts
would fit nicely in my own custom-built desktop rig.
About six weeks ago, I noticed two new DVD drives:
Lite On’s SOHW-1693S (internal IDE) and 1693SX
(external USB,) both sporting dual-layer support for
both the + and – recordable DVD formats. Why didn’t
you include dual-format, dual-layer burners in the
Dream Machine?
—Darryn O. Stevens
FEATURES EDITOR LOGAN DECKER RESPONDS:
Sometimes manufacturers let their drives hit
store shelves without giving reviewers a first
look. Most of the time, this is not good news
(there was a reason, after all, Hollywood didn’t
allow film critics to see Catwoman before it
opened in theaters). But this time, we suspect it
had more to do with the lack of media available
at launch time, in addition to the general malaise
regarding yet another recordable DVD format.
Now that DVD-R double-layer media is avail-
able (at 4x, no less), we’re bringing in drives that
support the format to see how it performs. But
we wouldn’t get too excited about it—drives like
Plextor’s PX-716A are capable of overspeeding
DVD+R DL media to 6x (that is, writing in excess
of the media’s rated speed), and until we see a
Dreaming
of Linux
In the September issue, your
“5 Ideas Microsoft Should
Steal” story noted five major
problems with Windows, yet
the Dream Machine had two
versions of Windows, but no
Linux. You definitely have
enough hard drive capacity
to include an alternative OS,
why didn’t you?
—Ryan Nisly
EDITOR IN CHIEF WILL
SMITH RESPONDS:
Because we don’t really
have a testing procedure or reference benchmarks set up for Linux
machines, we didn’t see any reason to expend time or effort getting Linux
to work on DMX. That said, there’s no reason DMX wouldn’t run any of the
major Linux distros. Our Netcell RAID card works with most Linux distros
without needing any drivers (getting hardware RAID to work is commonly
a coming-of-age ordeal for Linux users), and GeForce 7800 boards are
supported with the latest nVidia Linux driver.
in out YOU WRITE, WE RESPOND
CUTCOPYPASTE
On page 69 of the September issue, we inadvertently
ran the wrong URL for the Monarch Nemesis system.
The correct URL is http://www.monarchcomputer.com.