50 MAXIMUMPC DECEMBER 2006
his hands and knees looking for naturally
occurring specimens.
QMy Pentium Extreme Edition shows
up as four CPUs in the Task Manager. Is
that the same as a quad core?
ANo. The NetBurst-based PEE840,
PEE955, and PEE965 all feature dual-core
CPUs with support for Hyper-Threading,
which turns each single core into a virtual
dual-core CPU. While Hyper-Threading works
well enough, it’s in no way comparable to a
quad-core processor. Intel doesn’t offer HT on
any of its current Core-based processors—the
company says HT cost transistors that were
better spent elsewhere right now—but it hasn’t
ruled out the return of that technology.
Q What about front-side bus per-
formance? Why doesn’t the quad core
have a 1,333MHz FSB like the Xeon
5100 does today?
AUnlike AMD, which connects all of its
cores and CPUs using a direct chip-to-chip
architecture, Intel is currently wed to its
shared-bus topology. Remember the bridge
in our island analogy? That’s the front-side
bus, and in order to move from one island
(die) to the other, you have to travel that
bridge all the way to the mainland before
making your way back to the other island.
And that bridge is congested with all kinds
of traffi c that can affect travel time.
Intel claims that an analysis of the bus
traffi c under heavy loads using today’s appli-
cations indicates that we’re not even close to
saturating the FSB. Is that true? It’s hard to
say. Intel engineers do admit that it’s possible
to saturate the bus, but that you’d have to
write code specifi cally to do that. By foregoing
the 1,333MHz bus for this generation, Intel is
putting its architecture where its mouth is. Still,
no one at Intel has ruled out a move to a faster
front-side bus in the future, which suggests
that the company thinks traffi c might need to
be addressed at some point.
Q If the QX6800 is two Core 2 CPUs,
does that mean it has 8MB of L2 cache?
ATechnically, yes. Because the
QX6800 is essentially two Core 2 Duo E6700s
welded together, the cache remains the same
per die (64KB of L1 cache and 4MB of “smart”
L2 cache), for a total of 8MB of L2 cache
among the four cores. Remember, however,
that each set of two cores is on its own island.
The two cores on one island cannot share
cache with the two cores on the other.
The cache is still smart, though, which
means the two cores on one island can share
their 4MB dynamically. If one core is idle, the
other core can use all 4MB of the shared L2
cache. Both cores also communicate across
the cache—each core knows how much of the
cache the other is accessing. In a more tra-
ditional design, where each CPU core has its
own dedicated cache, if core 1 and core 2 are
working on the same data and core 1 needs
something that’s already in core 2’s L2 cache,
it can’t just grab it, it has to go out to main
memory to get it.
So while communication between the
two dies has to happen via the comparatively
slow front-side bus, communication within the
individual dies will enjoy all the benefi ts of the
original Core 2 Duo. This helps supports Intel’s
claim that the FSB design isn’t a problem.
QWill quad core work in my LGA775
motherboard?
AIf you listened to our advice and held
off buying an LGA775 mobo until it was
certifi ed to run with Core 2 processors, you
have a very good chance of it working with
a simple BIOS upgrade. That makes us
happy because, for the fi rst time in a long
time, Intel’s CPU and chipset/mobo folks
seem to be talking to one another.
QHow can I ensure that the mother-
board I buy supports quad-core CPUs?
AThe safest way is to check with the
vendor. If the website or package says the
mobo is quad-core ready, the vendor is on
the hook to support it. Still, some moth-
erboards that are capable of supporting
quad core require a BIOS update before
they will boot a quad. If you don’t have
access to another LGA775 processor to
use when fl ashing the BIOS, most vendors
will either fl ash the board for you before
they ship it out or exchange the board for
one with an updated BIOS.
QWhy is Intel offering its quad core
and dual core at the same price? Wouldn’t
it make sense to charge more for quad?
AThe procs are priced as such
because in today’s computing climate, each
offers advantages, but neither can claim
outright superiority. The dual-core Core 2
It’s a twofer! For the price of a
single X6800, you get two of those
dual-core CPUs in a single package,
for quad computing.
Quad Power!Quad Power!Quad Power!