reviewsTes Ted. Reviewed. veRdic Tized
78 MAXIMUMPC december 2006
W
hen we kvetch about the price of
Blu-ray drives and media, the prod-
uct makers like to point out that the
first consumer DVD burners were $900. Put in
that context the pain might be lessened, but
really it’s like saying a root canal doesn’t hurt
as much as getting your nose broken—both
are still experiences to avoid. At least the
second-gen Blu-ray burners offer more for
the money than the first-gen models.
—Gordon Mah UnG
Plextor Px-B900a
When is a Plextor drive a Plextor drive?
Certainly not when it’s a Panasonic.
To get onboard the Blu-ray train in a
hurry, Plextor rebadged a Panasonic SW-
5582 Blu-ray drive as its own. That’s not
necessarily a bad thing. Invaluable firm-
ware updates will come from Plextor and
not some Pac Rim outfit. And to be fair,
the Panasonic’s far better than the first-
gen Pioneer Blu-ray drive we reviewed in
October, which couldn’t even read CDs.
The Plextor BX-B900A writes to CD-R
at an acceptable 24x speed.
That’s far shy of today’s top-
of-the-line 48x burners, but
that’s the trade-off with the lat-
est round of Blu-ray drives—
they burn everything, just not
that fast. The BX-B900A burns
single-layer DVDs at 8x (with
speeds dropping to 4x for
double-layer DVDs).
The BX-B900A also trumps
Pioneer’s first-gen hardware
by burning not just single-layer
Blu-ray media, but double-
layer media as well,
for up to 50GB per
disc. Again, write
speeds are weak:
It took 1:34 (hour:
min) to fill a 22.6GB
write-once disc.
We were able to
play a Blu-ray movie
using the included
WinDVD BD player,
but without an HDCP
card in our test rig,
the player downsampled the content so badly
that it looked worse than DVD resolution.
While we applaud the latest improve-
ments to Blu-ray hardware, the PX-B900A’s
price tag still stings, as does the $20 a pop it
costs for write-once Blu-ray media.
Io data Brd-UM2/U
Combining a Blu-ray drive with a USB
interface seems at first like hitching a fly-
ing saucer to a wheelbarrow. Can USB’s
meager bandwidth handle such new-
fangled technology? Even at full-tilt, 2x
Blu-ray burns hover in the 8MB/s range,
which is actually
slower than an 8x
DVD burn. So, yes, USB 2.0 provides
plenty of bandwidth.
I/O Data’s BRD-UM2/U uses the same
Panasonic drive as Plextor’s model—the
only difference seems to be the external
USB cabinet. As such, we didn’t see any
major variations in performance, except
in CPU utilization. During full-speed DVD
burns, the USB-based drive pushed CPU
utilization to 47 percent versus 31 percent,
for the Plextor.
The killer for Blu-ray adopters is that
burning rewriteable BD-RE discs is slow.
As with Plextor’s drive, it took a frakking
hour and a half to write a measly 22.6GB!
Write-once media cuts that time down to
45 minutes, thankfully, but even that’s too
long. While waiting for our burn to finish,
we pondered whether optical’s time has
finally passed. For large data sets, isn’t
it much easier to just pop in your eSATA
hard drive and copy that 22.5GB in two
minutes instead? Granted, you can’t
distribute 100GB portable drives to your
friends and family, but it’s unlikely you’ll
be giving them a $20 Blu-ray disc either,
since they won’t have the $1,000 drive
required to read them.
Singing the Blu-ray
Blues
They shoulda called it green-ray
Io data’s portable USB Blu-ray drive makes sense, as few of
your associates will have the pricey drive necessary to play
your hd discs.
the Plextor Px-B900a might be a
rebadged Panasonic, but you still get
your firmware updates from Plextor,
which is worth its weight in gold.
$1,000, http://www.plextor.com
plextor px-b900A
SoUth Park
Famed Plextor firmware
support.
northern exPoSUre^6
An hour and a half to burn
23GB?!
Io data Plextor
Our current desktop test bed is a Windows XP SP2 machine, using a dual-core 2.6GHz Athlon 64 FX-60, 2GB of Corsair DDR400 RAM on an Asus A8N32-SLI motherboard, two GeForce 7900 GTX videocards in SLI mode, a Western
Digital 4000KD hard drive, a Sound Blaster X-Fi soundcard, and a PC Power and Cooling Turbo Cool 850 PSU.
DVD Write SpeeD AVerAge 6.76x 6.78x
DVD reAD SpeeD AVerAge 6.15x 6.17x
time to burn 22.6gb to bD-re (min:Sec) 1:33 1:34
time to burn 22.6gb to bD-r (min:Sec) 43:12 42:26
AcceSS time (rAnDom/Full) 157ms / 315ms 160ms / 318ms
cpu utilizAtion (8x) 47% 31%
benchMarkS
$900, http://www.iodata.com
io dAtA brd-um2/u
roBot chIcken
Surprisingly cheaper than
PATA drive version.
I, roBot^6
Slow burn times on all media,
and crazy expensive.