NOTES
- This surely supports a realist view of the external world.
- Jean Piaget, The Child’s Conception of the World (London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul, 1929).
- Jean Piaget, The Moral Judgement of the Child (London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul, 1932).
- D. Phillips, “Perspectives on Piaget: the Tough, Tender-Minded
Syndrome,” in Jean Piaget: consensus and controversy , ed. S. Modgil and
C. Modgil (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1982), 420.
- John H. Flavell, The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget (London:
D. Van Nostrand Company Inc., 1963), 205.
- If, for convenience, we call these possibilities the letters A, B, C and D,
then A means “it is raining and I shall put up an umbrella,” B means “it is
raining and I shall not put up an umbrella,” C means “it is not raining and
I shall put up an umbrella,” and D means “it is not raining and I shall not
put up an umbrella.” A+B means either “it is raining and I shall put up an
umbrella or it is raining and I shall not put up an umbrella.” Both condi-
tions could be true. The sixteen possible combinations of these proposi-
tions are 0, A, B, C, D, A+B, A+C, A+D, B+C, B+D, C+D, A+B+C,
A+B+D, A+C+D, B+C+D, A+B+C+D.
- Bärbel Inhelder and Jean Piaget, The Growth of Logical Thinking from
Childhood to Adolescence (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958),
292.
- Inhelder and Piaget, Growth , 293–333.
- Anthony C. Thiselton, New Horizons in Hermeneutics (London:
HarperCollins, 1992).
- Ken J. Archer, A Pentecostal Hermeneutic: Spirit, Scripture and Community
(London: Continuum, 2005); L. William Oliverio Jr., Theological
Hermeneutics in the Classical Pentecostal Tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2012).
See also http://enrichmentjournal.ag.org/top/month_holyspirit.cfm.
- Ronald J. Goldman, Religious Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence
(London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964).
- Nicola Slee, “Goldman Yet Again,” British Journal of Religious Education
8 (1986a): 84–93; Nicola Slee, “A Note on Goldman’s Methods of Data
Analysis with Special References to Scalogram Analysis,” British Journal of
Religious Education 8 (1986b): 168–175; Nicola Slee, “Getting Away
from Goldman: Changing Perspectives on the Development of Religious
Thinking,” The Modern Churchman 32, 1 (1990): 1–9; Ken Howkins,
Religious Thinking and Religious Education: A Critique of the Research
and Conclusions of Goldman (Bristol: Tyndale, 1966); Brian Gates,
PHILOSOPHY AND DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: RELEVANCE... 277
