102 MAXIMUMPC july 2007
We tackle tough reader questions on...
PCs in the Lab PGaming on Linux PF-22
Software PGeek Quiz Error? PTurntables
BY THE POWER OF GRAYSKULL!
How many PCs are running in your Lab at any given
moment? Inquiring minds want to know.
—Tony
Dave “To Hell with the Environment” Murphy
responds: Since Gordon is busy having a kid right
now, we’re wasting a little less electricity than
normal. To counteract the carbon reduction, I’m
currently setting forest fires and clubbing baby
seals with three active rigs. Katherine is but a
mere litterbug with one computer, though she
rolls with two or more monitors all the time. We’ll
upgrade her to “dumping toxic waste.” Michael
sends batteries to the landfill with just one com-
puter, and Will is doing his best to fight global
warming by keeping all of his machines in a
pristine, unplugged conditioned. Quoth him, “The
Power is Yours!” All told, the Lab PC count is five.
LINUX IS FOR GAMERS
I have to take issue with your article “Get Started
with Linux” (June 2007) even though it did show a
lot of what Linux can do. In particular, I disagree with
what you term a “limited amount of games.” I will
admit that I have OpenSuse and not Ubuntu and the
number of games available might seem limited in
terms of what’s available in the Windows world, but
110 free games came loaded with my system. There
are solitaire games, Tetris-like games, and more, so
I would dispute that the term “limited” really applies
in this case.
—John Meyer
EDITOR IN CHIEF WILL SMITH RESPONDS: Well,
I guess Linux’s gaming viability depends on
what you consider a game. Not to knock any
of our more casually oriented gamer brethren,
but when I knocked Linux for its lack of games,
I was specifically thinking of high-end AAA
games like Half-Life 2, Supreme Commander,
and World of Warcraft. I wasn’t thinking about
the Game of Life or Minesweeper clones.
SHHH, THEY’LL GET TO US TOO!
I just read your guide to copying and converting
media in the May 2007 issue and thought I would
share two observations regarding some of the soft-
ware mentioned.
As of March 31, the RipIt4Me website has been
closed and development of the program has been
discontinued, and as of April 19 the same goes
for FixVTS. No clear reasons or explanations were
given for the shutdowns.
—Julian Betances
EDITOR IN CHIEF WILL SMITH RESPONDS: Here’s
the scoop: The folks who built those two apps
were cease-and-desisted by persons unknown
mere days after we went to press. The good
news is that the apps are still available; you’ll
just have to use Google to find them. The bad
news is that this almost certainly means the
end of development for both of those apps. The
source code wasn’t available when they were
shut down, and the involved parties are almost
certainly prohibited from even discussing the
apps, much less releasing source code.
However, it’s not all bad news. To para-
phrase Jeff Goldblum’s goofy character from
Jurassic Park, hackers find a way. They always
find a way.
THE ONLY GEEK QUIZ COMPLAINT LETTER
WE RECEIVED THIS YEAR
I have a quick comment about your Geek Quiz article
(May 2007). You state that tip-ring-sleeve audio con-
nectors are mono and stereo. This is not true—tip/
ring/sleeve (TRS) connectors are stereo and tip/sleeve
(TS) connectors are mono only. The ring is what
allows for the second audio channel to be transmitted.
—Tim Henderson
EXECUTIVE EDITOR MICHAEL BROWN
RESPONDS: I agree that most TRS connectors
are stereo: The tip is used for one channel, the
The Real
Problem
with F-22s
I read Mr. Halfhill’s May 2007
column (“Multithreaded Booby
Traps”) with interest. I have sad
news for him regarding the head-
ings 180 East and 180 West. 180
is the only heading which is purely south and no other cardinal direction—always, no exceptions.
The F-22 error took place when the aircraft crossed the International Date Line, which is 180 degrees
longitude. The aircraft went from 180W longitude to 180E longitude. The software engineers should
be embarrassed.
Trust me.
—David McDonald
Lt Col, USAF Reserve (R) (that means very retired)
in outYOU WRITE, WE RESPOND
CUTCOPYPASTE
In the June 2007 issue, we inadvertently listed the
Ubuntu Linux distro’s homepage as http://www.ubuntu.org.
In fact, it’s http://www.ubuntu.com ; sorry for the
inconvenience.