Financial Times UK - 18.09.2019

(Steven Felgate) #1

W e d n e s d a y 1 8 S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 9 A F I N A N C I A L T I M E S 7


INTERNATIONAL


T


he contentious debate over whether or not to
use fiscal stimulus to bolster the eurozone’s
growth usually ends in a stalemate between
hawkish northern countries inclined to pru-
dence and those like Italy that want to loosen
thepublicpursestrings.
Butthistime,thedovesseemtobeintheascendant.
Even in Germany “the debate has shifted a bit”, accord-
ing to Isabel Schnabel, an economics professor and mem-
ber of the German Council of Economic Experts. “There
are more and more people saying that monetary policy
cannot be the only game in town, and if you don’t want
more and more monetary policy the only instrument that
isleftisfiscalpolicy.”
TheEuropeanCentralBankhasbecomemoreforthright
intellinggovernmentstogetonwithfiscalexpansion.Last
Thursday,inadditiontoannouncingnewmonetarystimu-
lus, the central bank substantially strengthened its call on
governmentstoboostaggregatedemand.
ECB president Mario Draghi said countries with room to
loosen their budgets should “act in an effective and timely
manner”. He added that every country should try to let
automatic stabilisers — tax and spending patterns that
causedeficitstomovecountercyclically—“operatefreely”.
He repeated these calls forcefully to a meeting of Euro-
peanfinanceministersinHelsinkithenextday.
One central bank governor said the change in language
moved the ECB collective position closer to Mr Draghi’s
defence of an explicit euro-level fiscal stance at Jackson
Hole in 2014. It is striking that this is less divisive than the
decision to restart central
bank bond purchases: Mr
Draghi said there was
“unanimous consensus
[that] fiscal policy should
become the main instru-
ment” to stimulate
demand.
That may not be
enough to change finance
ministers’ minds “but it can only help”, according to Isa-
belle Mateos y Lago, a BlackRock managing director. She
said many savers — individuals but also pension funds —
“woulddearlyliketoseehigherinterestrates”andtheECB
had sent them a message “that this will happen earlier if
fiscalpolicyturnsmoreexpansionary”.
The stronger ECB language “is very important”, said Ms
Schnabel. “Critics of monetary policy have to make up
theirmind.”
There is also a renewed debate on the EU’s fiscal rules,
which the Finnish government put on the agenda at the
Helsinki ministers’ meeting. The fact that the fiercely dis-
ciplinarian Finns chose to bring up the topic at all was a
signofchangingtimes,oneparticipantreflected.
The meeting received reform recommendations from
the European Fiscal Board. Its report shows that under
current rules, fiscal policy has done little to smooth busi-
ness cycles. They have also failed to protect public invest-
ment in downturns, holding back recoveries and subse-
quentgrowthpotential.
Nobodythinksimprovingtherulesiseasyorevenlikely.
Such are the disagreements over what to do that many
countries oppose even trying. And yet, the more attention
finance ministries pay to the current system’s inability to
stabilisethemacroeconomy,themorethosewithroomfor
moreexpansivebudgetswillhavetocontemplatedoingso.
What could turn that contemplation into action? One
thing would be for central bankers who disagree with Mr
Draghi on monetary policy at least to amplify his message
on fiscal policy. “If the Bundesbank says we need to do
more and we need to do it now, then Germany may
becomemoreactive,”saidMsSchnabel.
Another would be if the economy worsened. Ms Mateos
y Lago said the lack of trust between countries meant “it’s
too soon to tell how far the traditional red lines will move
[and] how big a shift we will see absent a recession”. One
might think forestalling recessions would be finance min-
isters’toppriority.Itmaytakeonetomakethemagree.

[email protected]

GLOBAL INSIGHT


EUROPE


Martin


Sandbu


Eurozone wakes up


to Draghi’s demand


for fiscal stimulus


‘More and more


people [are] saying
monetary policy

cannot be the only
game in town’

B E N JA M I N PA R K I N— MUMBAI


September 7 was to be a triumphant
day as India landed its first mission on
the Moon, joining a global elite of extra-
terrestrial heavyweights.


But bleary-eyed Indians, some up all
night and others just awakening,
watched in dismay as the Indian Space
Research Organisation (ISRO) lost con-
tact with Chandrayaan-2’s landing vehi-
clejustamilefromtheMoon’ssurface.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who
had championed the mission, reacted
quickly. In a televised address, he urged
his compatriots to rally behind India’s
space ambitions. And, switching briefly
to English, reminded other nations not
tounderestimatethem.
His most important foreign audience
was north of the Himalayas. India’s
space programme, long framed around
developmental goals such as improving
meteorological and telecommunica-
tions technology, has in recent years
increasingly sought to match China’s
mountingextraterrestrialprowess.
ChinastoleaheadofIndiawithitsown
lunar mission in January, landing the
Chang'e-4 probe on the previously


unexplored far side of the Moon. India’s
high-profile show of force when it
launched an anti-satellite missile in
March came more than a decade after
China’s first test. But India scored a vic-
tory when in 2014 it became the first
Asian nation to send an orbiter to Mars.
China’sfirstmissionisduein2020.
Analysts say India’s lack of manned
space travel is in part because its pro-
gramme, started in the 1960s, largely
eschewed the space-race logic that
fuelled extraterrestrial endeavours
beforethefalloftheBerlinWall.
Instead, it made a name for being
cost-effective — its Mars mission’s cost
of around $74m was roughly a tenth of
the US’s Mars orbiter — and serving
important domestic needs. For exam-
ple, it helped develop technology to
forecast crop quality and alert local
authorities to cyclones. This has deliv-
ered real benefits in helping to evacuate
riskareasaheadofnaturaldisasters.
India “has its own brand in terms of
space”, said Bharath Gopalaswamy, a
security analyst who is writing a book
about the ISRO, referring to its develop-
mental focus. But he said its focus had
shifted: “There is a very strong security

component in the space system that did
notexist,like,10yearsago.”
Thisshifttoagreaterfocusondefence
is in part because of China, which sent
its first manned mission to space in
2003 and sparked alarm with its 2007
anti-satellite missile test. China has also
helped other Asian countries with their
own space projects, creating concern
about perceived encroachment in
India’s backyard, echoing unease about
BeltandRoadinfrastructureprojects.
“China has used space as part of their
diplomacy in a much more effective
fashion,” said Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopa-

lan, a fellow at the Observer Research
Foundation in New Delhi. “We are slow
andwehavealotofcatchinguptodo.”
Most alarming for India is China’s alli-
ance with Pakistan. China last year
launched two satellites for India’s rival.
IthasalsolaunchedoneforSriLanka.
The prospect that India’s two main
strategic antagonists would join forces
in developing extraterrestrial capabili-
ties prompted India to accelerate the
military aspect of its programme and
culminated in the much publicised mis-
sile test, said Ajey Lele, a former Indian
Air Force officer and fellow at the Insti-
tuteforDefenceStudiesandAnalyses.
“It’s in India’s interest to remain pre-
pared for any sort of eventuality

... India’s military preparedness is
going to depend on space in years to
come,”hesaid.
India has carried out space diplomacy
of its own. Mr Modi last month inaugu-
rated an Indian space station in Bhutan,
and in 2017 launched a “South Asia Sat-
ellite” for use by neighbours, excluding
Pakistan. India has already partnered
withJapanforafutureMoonmission.
Additional reporting by Andrea Rodrigues
Anjana Ahujapage 11


Extraterrestrial ambition


India’s failed Moon mission highlights space race with China


Blow: Indians watch news of the
Moon mission, which ended badly

E DWA R D W H I T E— SEOUL

A former top North Korean diplomat
has urged US president Donald Trump
to strengthen sanctions against Kim
Jong Un’s regime, highlighting a sharp
divide on the best way to pressure the
country on denuclearisation.

Thae Yong Ho, North Korea’s former
deputy ambassador to the UK and one
of the most senior officials to have
defected, questioned whether Mr
Trump was “serious” about ending
NorthKorea’snuclearprogramme.
He warned that current sanctions,
which block almost all economic
engagement with Pyongyang, were not
tough enough nor sufficiently enforced
topressuretheNorthKoreandictatorto
abandonhisweaponsarsenal.
“That is really the hypocrisy of Presi-
dent Trump’s way of [reaching] denu-
clearisation; the current administration
knows the sanctions are not enough but
they are not doing anything more,” Mr
ThaesaidinanFTinterview.
The call for a more hardline approach

comes as Pyongyang and Washington
have signalled they might resume bilat-
eraltalkswithinweeks.
But the comments from Mr Thae
highlight a deep divergence among
international experts on what the cor-
rectstrategyshouldbe.
Since 2018, Mr Trump has refused to
weaken economic sanctions. North
Korea has not tested long-range ballistic
missiles or nuclear weapons in that
period but since May it has launched a
series of smaller weapons tests, its first
suchmovessince2017.
John Delury, a North Korea expert at
Yonsei University in Seoul, said
Pyongyang made the “biggest progress”
in its nuclear weapons programme in
2017, immediately after an increase in
sanctions, demonstrating that tougher
economicpressurehadnotcurtailedthe
Kimregime’sarmsdevelopment.
But author and human rights activist
Yeonmi Park, who escaped North Korea
in 2007, said she “definitely” supported
tougher sanctions because the country’s
elitewouldbemostaffected.

Denuclearisation


Leading North Korea defector


calls for tougher sanctions


M E H R E E N K H A N— STRASBOURG


The Dutch government plans tax cuts
and extra investment next year, setting
asidesomeofitsusualfiscalprudencein
a response to the threat of a regional
economicslowdown.
Wopke Hoekstra, the Netherlands’
finance minister, announced €3bn of
tax cuts for households and outlined
plans for an investment fund as part of
annual budget proposals. However, cuts
incorporatetaxrateswillbehalted.
Mr Hoekstra said that the plans were
designed to protect “robust” economic
growth.
“We are working not only on our cur-


rentprosperitybutalsoonthatoffuture
generations,” Mr Hoekstra told parlia-
ment. “The country is in a better posi-
tion to absorb economic setbacks in the
future.”
The plans to stimulate the economy
come as eurozone governments that
have capacity to spend more — includ-
ingtheNetherlands—arebeingurgedto
dosotoarrestaslowdowningrowth.
Calls for fiscal expansion have been
led by Mario Draghi, president of the
European Central Bank. He has
implored governments to take up the
baton to aid the bloc’s economy recov-
ery after the ECB cut interest rates to
freshrecordlowslastweek.
TheDutcheconomyhasbeengrowing
steadily for several years but is exposed
to any fallout from a chaotic no-deal
Brexitandglobaltradetensions.
Growth in the Netherlands is

expected to slow to 1.8 per cent this year
and1.5percentin2020.
Long known for fiscal prudence, the
centre-right Dutch government has
embraced a move towards investment
andcutsintaxburdensforworkers.
Among the most innovative ideas to
lift spending, the government will
explore the creation of an investment
fund to lock in negative borrowing rates
tofinancegrowth-enhancingprojects.
The size of the fund has not been
revealed but has been touted at around
€50bn. It would target long- and medi-
um-term spending projects in infra-
structure, digital, and climate friendly
projects.
“Low interest rates provide opportu-
nities for this,” said Mr Hoekstra. “We
will explore avenues to invest more in
innovation, knowledge development
andinfrastructure.”

The government will present a blue-
print for the fund to the Dutch parlia-
mentin2020.
The Dutch shift towards stimulus will
put pressure on fellow fiscal hawks, led
byGermany,tospendtheirwaythrough
a looming downturn. This month Olaf
Scholz, German finance minister, pre-
sented a draft federal budget that held
firm to the country’s “black zero” policy
to avoid new borrowing. Mr Scholz has
since promised to spend “many bil-
lions”counteractingadownturn.
Mr Hoekstra announced the stimula-
tive measures alongside figures project-
ing that the country’s ratio of debt to
gross domestic product will fall below
50percentnextyear.
The Netherlands is still expected to
boast a fiscal surplus in 2020 of close to
1percentofGDPafterthemeasures.
Editorial Commentpage 10

Europe


Netherlands rolls out growth strategy


Tax cuts and increase in


investment planned to


mitigate slowdown risk


‘The
country is

in a better
position to

absorb
economic

setbacks in
the future’

TO B I A S B U C K— FREIBURG


In the global battle against climate
change, the German city of Freiburg
offersararesuccessstory.
Overmorethan30years,theprosper-
ous city in the Black Forest has used
every lever at its disposal to cut green-
house gas emissions. It has invested in
renewable energy, imposed Germany’s
strictest building standards, con-
structed an entire low-emissions neigh-
bourhood, built bicycle lanes and tram
linesandpushedcarsoutofthecitycen-
tre. The result is that greenhouse gas
emissions in the city of 230,000 people
have fallen more than 37 per cent per
head since 1992, significantly better
thantheGermanaverage.
As political leaders in Berlin prepare
toadoptafar-reachingpackageofmeas-
ures to cut carbon emissions on Friday,
thecityhighlightstheimportance—and
the limits — of local actors in the strug-
gleagainstclimatechange.
At the same time, Freiburg has served
as a laboratory for the kind of policies
Europe’s largest economy will need to
meet its climate reduction targets for
2030 and become carbon-neutral by
2050,asBerlinhasvowed.
“The big challenges that are discussed
at the international level, including cli-
mate change, they ultimately have to be
addressedatthelocallevel,”saidMartin
Horn,thecity’smayor.
“It is up to us to decide whether we
spendmoneyonanewfour-laneroador
onanewtramline.Wecandoalotatthe
local level — and that is what we have
doneinFreiburgformanyyears.”
Beginning in 1996, the city set itself a
series of climate targets that have been
periodically sharpened. Freiburg is now
committed to lowering carbon emis-
sions by 60 per cent by 2030, more
ambitiousthanthenationalobjective.
While political leaders in Berlin are
finalising details of the national climate
package, Freiburg’s council unani-
mously agreed its latest climate pact in
March. It includes, among other things,
a planned neighbourhood for up to


15,000 residents that will be entirely
emissions-neutral. A carbon-neutral
football stadium is also in the works, as
is a further expansion of public trans-
portandarenewedclampdownoncars.
Thebarrageofmeasuresenjoysbroad
political backing and draws on green
campaigningsincethe1970s,whenlocal
protests succeeded in blocking plans for
a nuclear power station. Today, “people
in Freiburg demonstrate not because
they think we do too much for the cli-
matebuttoolittle”,saidMrHorn.
The city’s pioneering reputa-
tion attracts more than 200 interna-
tional delegations every year who come
toinspectitsgreenprogrammes,includ-
ing from China, South Korea, Australia
andtheUS.Theyfindanapproachtocli-
mate policy that centres not on one or
two sweeping reforms but on myriad
individual measures — many of them
small and seemingly unspectacular —
that are refined over many years.
“Youhavetoproceedonanincredibly
broad front,” said Klaus von Zahn, the

head of the city government’s depart-
mentfortheenvironment.
Transport is a case in point. After a
decades-long campaign to prioritise
green means of transport over cars, the
shareofcitytripsmadebybikehasrisen
from 15 per cent in 1982 to 34 per cent
today. Car journeys account for 21 per
cent,downfromalmost40percent.
Much of the picturesque inner city is
reserved for cyclists, pedestrians and
trams. Parking space has been reduced,
and 90 per cent of roads are subject to a
30kmhspeedlimit.
“All this means that the bicycle is now
the fastest mode of transport in the
city,”saidMrvonZahn.
Another example are buildings such
as Freiburg’s new city hall, which is cov-
ered by more than 2,000 solar panels
and generates more energy than it uses.
Like all new municipal buildings in the
city, including schools and kindergar-
tens, it is required to be at least
emissions-neutral.Privatehomeowners
can request a free visit from one of the

city’s climate advisers to help reduce
emissionsandenergybills.Residentson
welfare can apply to have their old
fridge swapped for a new, energy-saving
one—paidforbythelocalgovernment.
The most imposing symbol of Frei-
burg’s green ambitions is Vauban, a
former French army barracks that has
been turned into a low-emissions neigh-
bourhood for 5,500 people. Cars are
mostly banned, buildings are designed
to release as little heat as possible and
solar panels are ubiquitous. Yet for all
Freiburg’s climate measures, the limits
oflocalactionarealsoplain.
Hans-Martin Henning, a Vauban resi-
dent and the director of the Freiburg-
based Fraunhofer Institute for Solar
Energy Systems, said: “Freiburg has
done a lot of things that do not look
spectacular but that were highly effec-
tive.”
But he added: “When it comes to the
grandpoliticalframework,acityispow-
erlessattheendoftheday.”
Robin Hardingpage 11

Germany.Climate change


Freiburg sets the pace in carbon reduction


The Black Forest city shows


the benefits but also the


limitations of local action


Garden city: the former
French barracks at
Vauban has been turned
into a low-emission
neighbourhood —Alamy

37 %
Reduction in
greenhouse
emissions per
head in Freiburg
since 1992

60 %
Target set by
city authorities
for lowering
emissions
by 2030

200
International
delegations that
visit city’s green
programmes
each year

21 %
Journeys taken
by car in the
city, down from
40 per cent
in 1982

SEPTEMBER 18 2019 Section:World Time: 17/9/2019 - 19:19 User: ian.holdsworth Page Name: WORLD3, Part,Page,Edition: LON, 9, 1

Free download pdf