170 4. PROOF OF THE COMPACTNESS THEOREM
Define the local versions of Fk£;r byGf P.;r ~ ( fif)-
1o FkP.;r o Hf.
We may pull back to jjjf3 via the map fif to get
L q/k o Hf (X) exp;~ (X) Fk£,(3 (X) = 0,
a::;A(r) · k£;rwhere now the map exp is with respect to the metric gf = ( fif) * gg.
To see the limiting behavior of Fk£;r when k, .e are large, we note that
since Proposition 4.34 implies for each f3 that we have
Fk£,f3 ___,. id(J when k, .e ___,. oo,then by Proposition 4.54, we have G~fr ___,. id(J on any compact subset of Ef3
in C^00 • We have proved the following.'
PROPOSITION 4.35 (The maps Fk£;r converge to id in a sense). For every
r > 0, c > 0, and p E NU {O} there exists ko = ko (r, E,p) such that for
f3:SA(r),
I \JP ( G~P.;r - id(J) I ::; c
for all k, .e 2:: ko, where \7 and I· I are the covariant derivative and norm with
respect to the Euclidean metric on Ef3.As a corollary we have the following.COROLLARY 4.36 (FkP.;r is a local diffeomorphism). There exists ko =
ko ( r) such that if k, .e 2:: ko, then Fk£;r I B.a is a diff eomorphism for each
k
(3:SA(r).
PROOF. If G~fr is sufficiently close to the identity map, then it must be
injective since its derivative is nonsingular. DNow we turn to proving that given (c,p) and r, fork, .e large enough, Fk£,r
is an (c,p)-pre-approximate isometry. First we have the following general
result.
LEMMA 4.37 (Limit of almost-identity pullbacks). Let ¢k : U ___,.UC Rn
be diffeomorphisms, let id: U ___,. U be the identity map, and let {hkhEN and
h 00 be Riemannian metrics on U. Suppose hk and h 00 are uniformly equiv-
alent to the Euclidean metric for all k E N and their derivatives (covariantderivatives with respect to the Euclidean metric) are uniformly bounded. If
¢k ---t id and hk ---t h 00 in C^00 uniformly on compact sets, then for every
c > 0, p E N, and compact set K c U, there exists ko = ko (c,p, K) such
that if k 2:: ko, then
sup sup l\lr (¢khk - hoo)I (x) :Sc,
o::;r::;pxEK