- NO FINITE TIME LOCAL COLLAPSING 257
PROOF. (i) ===?(ii). We prove (ii) by contradiction. Suppose g (t) is
locally collapsing at T. Then there exists a sequence of times tk /' T and a
sequence of metric balls Bg(tk)(xk, rk) such that
r2
(1) t: ::=:; C for some C < oo,(2) IRm(g(tk))I ::=:; r'k^2 in Bg(tk)(xk,rk),
(3) Volg(tk) B9~k) (xk, rk) ""'0 as k ---too.
rk
Hence by (i) we have injg(tk) (xk) 2:: Ork for all k, where o > 0 is indepen-
dent of k. By Lemma 6.54(ii), the volume collapsing statement (3) above
cannot be true, a contradiction.
(ii)===? (i). We also prove (i) by contradiction. If (i) is not true, then
there exists C > 0 and a sequence of points and times (xk, tk) EM x [O, T)and Wk E (0, JCtk] satisfying
and1.IRm(tk)I::::; w2 m Bg(tk) (xk, Wk)
kinjg(tk) (xk)wk ""'
0
·
Lemma 6.54(i) implies that Volg(tk) B~~)(xk,Wk) ""'0 as k ---too. Thus g (t) is
k
locally collapsing at T and we have a contradiction. The lemma is proved.
D
It follows from Theorem 6.59 and Lemma 6.61 that Hamilton's little loop
conjecture holds for solutions of the Ricci flow on closed manifolds forming
finite time singularities.COROLLARY 6.62. Let g(t), t E [O, T), be a smooth solution to the Ricciflow on a closed manifold Mn. If T < oo, then the little loop conjecture
holds. That is, for any C > 0 there exists o > 0 such that if (x, t) E
M x [O, T) and W E (0, VCt] satisfy
1
IRm (t)I::::; w2 in Bg(t) (x, W)'then we have injg(t) (x) 2:: oW
The little loop conjecture illustrates the essence of no locally collapsing
from the injectivity radius perspective. For convenience we give the followingDEFINITION 6.63 (Local injectivity radius estimate). We say that a com-
plete solution (Mn, g (t)), t E [O, T), to the Ricci flow satisfies a local in-
jectivity radius estimate if for every p E (0, oo) and C < oo, there exists
c = c (p, C, g (t)) > 0 such that for any (p, t) E M x [O, T) and r E (0, p]
which satisfy