- REDUCED VOLUME FOR RICCI FLOW 391
We will use the convention
£Jv (r) ~ 0 for r 2: rv.
We can then write the reduced volume as
(8.19)
We compute the evolution of£ along a minimal £-geodesic 'Yv(r) for
0 :'Sr < rv, where VE TpM· For q = 'Yv(r), r E [0,ry), the function
£(·, ·) is smooth in some small neighborhood of (q, r); hence the following
derivatives of£ at such (q, r) exist. Recall from (7.78) that
r^312 ( R + IXl^2 ) (r) = -K + ~L (q, r),
where K = K (r) is the trace Harnack integral defined by (7.75). Thus
(8.20)
Recall equation (7.88):
and from (7.54) recall that
!£ (q, r) = 'Yv (r) = X (r).
Hence the derivative of the reduced distance along a minimal £-geodesic is
given by
(8.21)
by (8.20).
d f)f,
dr [£ hv (r), r)] = or+ \If,· X
1 e 2
=~ 12 K--+R+IXI
2r T
= -~r-3/2K
2
The following lemma can be viewed as an infinitesimal Bishop-Gromov
volume comparison result for the Ricci fl.ow geometry. The striking part
is that no curvature assumption is needed.
LEMMA 8.16 (Pointwise monotonicity along £-geodesics). Suppose that
(Mn, g ( r)) , r E [O, T] , is a complete solution to the backward Ricci flow
with bounded curvature.