142 20. COMPACTNESS OF THE SPACE OF 11:-SOLUTIONS
Claim. There exists a constant C1 < oo independent of k such that
(20.31) Rgk (y, O) < C for ally E B 9 k(o) (zk, 2rk).
R9k (zk, 0) -
1
To see the claim, we choose Yk E Mk such that
3
d9k(O) (xk, Yk) = 4rk.
Since Bgk(O) (yk, lrk) C Bgk(O) (xk, rk) -B 9 k(O) (xk, !rk), by (20.30) we have
Rgk (y, 0) < 4rk^2
for any
YE Bgk(O) (Yk, lrk) ·
This local curvature bound and the A;-solution assumption (in particular,
being A;-noncollapsed at all scales^16 ) imply that
Volgk(O) Bgk(O) (yk, lrk) :::::: A; arkf.
For any y E Bgk(o) (zk, 2rk), we have
Bgk(o)(Y, 4rk) =:l Bgk(o) (zk, 2rk) =:l Bgk(o) (xk, rk) =:l B9k(o) (Yk, lrk)
and hence^17
(20.32)
Now consider the rescaled metric
hk ~ Rgk (zk, 0) 9k (0) = rk^2 9k (0) ,
which satisfies Rhk (zk) = 1, together with the ball
Bhk (zk, 2) = Bgk(O) (zk, 2rk).
Now if the claimed local curvature bound (20.31) is not true, then there
exists a subsequence such that
sup Rhk (w)-+ oo
wEBhk (zk,2)
ask-+ oo.
Applying the point picking Lemma 18.15 to this sequence of metrics and
balls, we obtain sequences of points and radii
Wk E Bgk(O) (zk, 2rk) and Sk E (0, 3rk)
such that
(^16) Note that since Rm ::'.". 0, we have IRml :::; R.
(^17) To wit, by 'radii picking' (the Zk determine the radii d 9 k(o)(Xk,Zk)) we have cur-
vature control in balls (centered at Yk), which by K-noncollapsing imply volume (lower)
bounds for those balls, which in turn by containment imply volume bounds for larger balls
with centers not too far away (for which we do not yet have curvature control).