- NOTES AND COMMENTARY 211
The claim now ensues from the following consequences of the co-area for-
mula:This also completes the proof of the theorem. DEXERCISE 22.18. Prove (22.98).The following result has been used in deriving the contradiction in the
proof of the pseudolocality Theorem 21.9.THEOREM 22.19. Let (Mn, g) be a Riemannian manifold and suppose
B (xo, p) is compact. If there exists a constant In E (0, oo) such that(22.101) (Area(an)t:::::: In (Vol(n)r-^1
for any compact domain n C B (xo, p) whose boundary is 01 , then for any
01 function 'ljJ compactly supported in B (xo, p) we haveJM (2jV''lj;j2 - 'lj;2 log'l/J2) dμ +log (JM 'l/J2dμ) JM 'l/J2 dμ
(22.102) :::::: (sn +log (:))JM 'lj;^2 dμ.
PROOF. By approximation, we may assume that 'ljJ is a nonnegative 01
function compactly supported in B (xo, p). With this, the proof of Theorem
22.16 applies without change. Note that since supp ('lj;) c B (x 0 , p), we haveMs C B(xo,p) for s > 0. D
5. Notes and commentary
§4. For a classical application of spherical symmetrization to the proof of
the Faber-Krahn inequality (originally conjectured by Rayleigh), see §III.3
of Chavel [28].
Backward uniqueness and unique continuation. Recently, related to work
of Alexakis [2] (see also Alexakis-Ionescu-Klainerman [3] and Wong-Yu
[190]) and using Carleman-type estimates, Kotschwar [112] proved the fol-
lowing.
THEOREM 22.20 (Backward uniqueness for solutions of Ricci fl.ow). If
gl (t) and g2 (t) are two complete solutions of the Ricci flow with bounded
curvature on a manifold Mn and time interval [O, T] such that gl (T) =
g2 (T), then gl (t) = g2 (t) for all t E [O, T].
As a consequence, we have the following answer to a question of Arthur
Fischer (see also Problem 4.21 in [45]).