58 Scientific American September 20 18
GENETIC CODE
THE LIST OF ABILITIES that were formerly thought to be a
unique part of human language is actually quite long.
It includes parts of language such as words. Vervet
monkeys use wordlike alarm calls to signal a specific
kind of danger. Another crucial aspect is structure. Be-
cause we have syntax we can produce an infinite
number of novel sentences and meanings and we can
understand sentences that we have never heard be-
fore. Yet zebra finches have complicated structure in
their songs dolphins can understand differences in
word order and even some monkeys in the wild seem
to use one type of call to modify another. The list ex-
tends to types of cognition such as theory of mind
which is the ability to infer othersâ mental states. Dol-
phins and chimpanzees are excellent at guessing what
an interlocutor wants. Even the supposedly unique
ability to think about numbers falls by the waysideâ
bees can understand the concept of zero bees and rhe-
sus monkeys can count to four and cormorants used
for fishing in China reportedly count to seven.
The list includes genes. The famous FOXP2 gene
once called a language gene is indeed a gene that af-
fects languageâwhen it is mutated it disrupts artic-
ulationâbut it performs other roles as well. There is
no easy way to tease out the different effects. Genes
are critical for understanding how language evolved
says Simon Fisher a geneticist at the Max Planck In-
stitute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen the Nether-
lands but âwe have to think about what genes do.â To
put an incredibly complex process very briefly: genes
code for proteins which then affect cells which may
be brain cells that form neural circuits and it is those
circuits that are then responsible for behavior. âIt
may be that there is a network of genes that are im-
portant for syntactic processing or speaking profi-
cientlyâ Fisher explains âbut there wonât be a single
gene that can magically code for a suite of abilities.â
The list of no-longer-completely-unique human
traits includes brain mechanisms too. We are learn-
Evolution of Language
"D³ÂøDÂxäÂDþx` ̧ÂçxÄäîÃø`îøÃxäjwhich
enable say English speakers to guess what
ÃU§øxÂÂÃDÂxÃÂÂÂÂîÂxD³xþx³ÂÂ
îÂxÄÂDþx
³xþxÃUxÂ
̧Ãxx³` ̧ø³îxÃxlîÂDîÃDÃîÂ`ø§DÃ
` ̧ÂU³Dî ̧³ ̧Â
ÿ ̧ÃläÃÄîx³äÂþxäîølÂxäUÄ
3 ̧³!ÂÃUÄ Ì§Â
îÂx7³ÂþxÃäÂÃ®Ä Ì§Â
l³UøÃÂÂ
D³l ̧îÂxç³ÂøÂäîääøÂÂxäîîÂDî§D³ÂøDÂx
äîÃø`îøÃxlxÃÂþxäÂ
à ̧ÂÃxÃxDîxl§Äøä³Â
ÿ ̧Ãläî ̧` ̧³þxÄÂlxDäîÂà ̧øÂÂÂD³ÄÂx³-
xÃDî ̧³äóD`ÂÃ`ø§DÃÃà ̧`xääÃxÃxDîxl
³³øÂxÃDU§xîÂÂxäj ̧³xäÃxD¦xÃj ̧ÃDÂx³îj
passes a concept on to others (^) â 1 þÂDÿÂDî-
xþxÃäîó ̧Â
ÿ ̧ÃlääÂx ̧ÃÂxÂDäîÂøäÂ
DÃ
§xDóxlÃ5ÂxDU§ÂîÄî ̧îÃD³äÂÂîD³ÂlxD
̧ÂxÃx³î§ÄlxÃx³lä ̧³
̧³ÂîÂþxDÃD
ÂîÂxä
³ÂxÃÂîxlÂ
à ̧ÂÃDÃx³îäÃ5ÂxÃxÂÃÂx³îä ̧Â
îÂÂäøîîxÃD³
xø³lxÃäîD³lÂîDäUxäîîÂxÄ
D³D³l
̧³þxÄÂîî ̧ ̧îÂxÃä (^) â 2 within the
̧ÂÂø³ÂîÄjD§ ̧³ÂÿÂîÂîÂxÂà ̧ÿ³ ̧lÂÂ-
Dî ̧³äÃ5ÂxäxÂD³ÂxäD``øÂø§Dîx ̧þxà Âx³xÃDî ̧³ä³îÂx
ø§îøÃxÃ3 ̧Âx ̧³xÿ ̧
D³UxîîxÃÂDäîxÃîÂxxÂxóÂlÂä
̧øÃäx
̧Â
îÂx̧ÂÂø³ÂîÄÂäDääøÂxlî ̧Ux ̧Ãx §Â¦x§Äî ̧ÃDää ̧³ÂÂä ̧ÃÂxÃÂx³xäÃ5ÂxÃx- Â
̧ÃxjÿÂîÂîÂÂxîÂxD``øÂø§Dîxl
ø§îøÃD§
Ãx³xÂx³îäÂDijÂøx³xU ̧§ ̧ÂÂ
D§
properties (^) â 3 ÃÂDÄ
³§ÄjÂ
à ̧ÂîÂÂäUDUx§
xþx³îøD§§ÄxÂxÃÂxä ̧ÃlxÃjDäîÂxäÃxD¦xÃäj
all trying to learn the language as best they
D³j
̧³þxÃÂx ̧³D䳧xjäîÃøîøÃxl§D³- ÂøDÂxîÂDîÂäU ̧î§xDóDU§xD³løäxÂ
ø§Â
̧Ã
̧³þxij³Â
̧ÃÂDî ̧³Ã³äøÂj§D³ÂøDÂx
³D§§Âîä̧ÂçxÄÂîÄxÂxÃÂxäÂ
à ̧Â
ø§îøÃxÃ
SOURCE: âCULTURE AND BIOLOGY IN THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC STRUCTUREâ BY SIMON KIRBY IN
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
VOL. 24 NO. 1; FEBRUARY 2017
Graphic by Federica Fragapane
³DÂÃ
ø§DÃÃà ̧xääÃxÃxDîxl
Dî ̧³äÃ5Âxäx`ÂD³ÂxäD``øÂø§Dîx ̧þxÃ
BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
INDIVIDUAL
LEARNING
AND USE
CULTURAL EVOLUTION
LANGUAGE
Culture may STRUCTURE
ultimately
mold biological
properties
Idea
conveyed
according to
a personâs
cognitive
and other
abilities
Other
individuals
with their
own capacities
retransmit
the idea using
the emerging
language
1
2
3