1549055384-Symplectic_Geometry_and_Topology__Eliashberg_

(jair2018) #1

202 D. SALAMON, FLOER HOMOLOGY


is independent of the choice of this a.


The existence of a is obvious from Step 1. Moreover, if the points Zai, Zaj, Zak, Zae


are all distinct, then a is unique. If not then w(zai, Zaj, Zak, Zae) E {O, 1, oo} and a

simple combinatorial argument shows that this number is independent of a.


Step 3: Two stable Riemann surfaces z and z of genus zero with n marked points


are equivalent if and only if w1(z) = w1(z) for all I= (i, j, k, f) E In.

This is proved by induction over the number of vertices. The induction step is to


remove an endpoint from the tree. A set of indices I C { 1, ... , n}, corresponding


to the marked points on a given endpoint of the tree, can be characterized by the
conditions


(45)

(46)

i,i' EI, j,j' ~I


i,i^1 ,i^11 EI, j ~I


Wii'jj' = 00,

Wii'i"j =/=-00.

Given any such set one can reduce the number of vertices by replacing { 1, ... , n}


with { 1, ... , n} - I and reordering.


Step 4: Let w = { Wij kd E ( S^2 )1n be given. Then there exists a stable Riemann


surface z of genus zero with n marked points such that Wijke = Wijke(z) for all

i, j, k, e if and only if w satisfies (42) and (43).

This is again proved by induction over the number of vertices. The key point in the
induction is to prove that, for every tuple w = { Wijke} which satisfies ( 42) and ( 43),
there exists a nontrivial subset I C {1, ... , n} which satisfies ( 45) and ( 46). Here


nontrivial means that I=/=- 0 and I=/=-{1,... , n}. For more details see [20]. D


Proof of Proposition 4.19: For any sequence z,, of stable Riemann surfaces


of genus zero with n marked points and any z one proves that the following are
equivalent.


(a) z,, DM-co nverges to z.
(b) For 11 sufficiently large there exists a surjective tree homomorphisms f" :

T---+ T v and Mobius transformations <p~ E G such that f"(ai) = ai and

Zai = 1/-->00 lim (<p~)-^1 (zjv(a)i)


for a E T and i E { 1, ... , n}.


(c) For any four distinct integers i,j,k,f E {l, ... ,n}, Wijke(z)

lim,,__,oo Wijke(z,,).

The proof of (a) {===} (b) ===} (c) is fairly straight forward. The hard part is to
show that ( c) implies (b). The key point here is the observation that, for any two
stable Riemann surfaces z and z' of genus zero with n marked points, there exists


a surjective tree homomorphism f : T---+ T ' with f(ai) =a~ for all i if and only if


Wijke(z') = oo ===} Wijke(z) = oo


for all i,j,k,f E {1,... , n}. For more details see [20]. D

Proof of Proposition 4.20: The proof is based on an explicit construction of


coordinate charts. Given a point [z] E Mo,n we must pick out n - 3 of the cross
ratios from which all the others can be reconstructed (in a neighbourhood of the

Free download pdf