LECTURE 2. ANALYTICAL TOOLS 59
The third assertion gives a characterisation of completeness which is a version
of Ekeland's variational principle. It is very useful in the calculus of variations,
see [33]. The second assertion is due to Hofer and very useful in carrying out
an analysis for conformally invariant problems on unbounded domains. This will
become clear in the following bubbling-off analysis.
Exercise 2.7. Prove proposition 2.6.
Now we are in the position to prove the theorem. Take a sequence Ee ---+ 0 such
that
IY'ue(ze)IEe---+ + oo.
Applying the lemma and perhaps replacing ze by z~ and Ee by E~ we may assume
in addition to ( 4) that
(5)
IY'ue(z)I ::::; 2IY'ue(ze)I, lz - zel ::::; Ee
IY'ue(ze)IEe---+ +oo
Ee ---+ 0.
Define ue = (ae, ue) and
Then
z z
ve(z)=(ae(ze+ Re)-ae(ze),ue(ze+ Re))
Re = IY'ue(ze)I.
8/ve + l(ve)8tve = O
E( ve) ::::; c
IY've(z)I::::; 2
IY've(O)I = 1.
on DRe(l-lzel)
on DRe<e
Hence, by the C^00 -Ascoli-Arzela theorem, after taking a subsequence
ve---+ v in C 1 ~(C, JR x M)
osv + lotv = 0 on C
E(v) ::::; c
IY'v(O) I = 1.
Therefore v : C ---+ JR x M is non-constant and
Vs+ lvt = 0
0 < E(v)::::; c.
A much more sophisticated bubbling-off analysis is possible and we refer the
reader to the literature, [48, 49, 51, 55]. For the related bubbling-off analysis in
the compact case see [36, 42, 75, 88, 90].
2.3. Behaviour near a puncture
Using holomorphic polar coordinates near the puncture we may assume
u: [O,oo) x S^1 ---+ JR x M