324 Difference Sche1nes with Constant Coefficients
But it is absolutely unstable: this scheme becon1es unstable for any way of
tending T and h to zero.
As further developtnents occur, we rewrite equation (59) as
..
(60)
j +I j-I
Yi - Yi
2T
Yi-I J -^2 Yi J + Yi+1 J
h2
Upon substituting the sum y/+I + y/-^1 for 2 y/ in the right-hand side of
equation (60) the resulting three-layer "rho1nbus" schen1e known as the
Du-Fort-Frankel schen1e
(61)
j +I j -I
Yi - Yi
2T
j j+I j-I j
Yi-I - Yi - Yi + Yi+1
h2
becomes explicit with respect to y/+^1 and appears to be absolutely stable
for any h and T. In giving an alternative form of the "rhombus" scheme
(62)
with Ytt = (y/+I - 2y/ + y/-^1 ) r-^2 we may attempt the right-hand side
of equation (61) in the form
Yi-I - Yi - Yi+ Yi+1
h2
Yi-I - 2 Yi+ Yi+1
h2
T2
= Yxx - h 2 Ytt ·
Yi - 2 Yi +Yi
h2
Substitution of the last expression into (61) yields (62). As a matter of fact,
the "rhombus" scheme is some modification of the Richardson scheme with
the extra member on the left-hand side of (61) r^2 h-^2 Yrt, which assures
us of its stability. The proof of stability of sche1ne (62) is an immediate
implication of the general theory of Chapter 6 and is omitted here. The
error of approximation for scheme (62) is
2 2 2
1/J = Au-u 1 - ~ 2 uft = u"-i"t- ~ 2 ii+O(h^2 +r^2 ) = - ~ 2 ii+O(h^2 +r^2 ).
From such reasoning it seetns clear that the "rhombus" scheme provides
the conditional approximation