514 Difference Methods for Solving Nonlinear Equations
whence it follows that at the point x = 0
(
D2(J)1/o
u(U, t) = --;,;--- t^1!^0.
0
A comparison with (16) gives
1
n= -, (J
Thus, we have proved by having recourse to a "travelling" wave that prob-
lem ( 15)-(17) is solvable and its solution admits the form
{
l/o ( _ ___:_) l/o _ Uo _ l/o
(l 8 ) u(x, t) = U^0 t 1 Dt - Dl/o (Dt x) , 0 < x < Dt,
0, x > Dt,
provided the condition n = 1/ (J holds. Any solution of the fonn ( 18) ls
called a "temperature wave" with a finite velocity. vVhat is more, it
depends on three parameters x 0 , (J and u 0 in accordance with the law
At the next stage we focus our attention on the heat flow
ou u^0 +^1 u^0
W -- -"o OJ uo OX -- "o OJ (J Dl+l/o o (Dt - x)l/o = " OJo (J oD u(x, t).
In view of this, on the front of the temperature wave x = Dt the tempera-
ture and heat flow vanish for (J > 0 and the partial derivative
OH u 0 1
ox (J Dl/u (Dt - x)l-1/u
tends to= for (J > l, it is finite for (J = 1 and becomes zero for 0 < (J < 1.
Therefore, it is meaningful to speak for (J > 1 only about a generalized
solution to the heat conduction equation ( 15).
A case in point is a nonlinear dependence of the coefficient of heat
conductivity upon the te1nperature. From the formula for D it is easily
seen that we fonnally have D = = for the linear heat conductivity when
(J = O; lneaning that the velocity of heat conducting turns out to be infinite.