108 J.W. COGDELL, £-FUNCTIONS FOR GLn~ E V7f. Then we have two nonzero Whittaker functionals on V7f, namely Ai(~) =
W'P, ( e). By the uniqueness of Whittaker models , there is a nonzero constant c such
that A 1 = cA2. But then we have W'P 1 (g) = A1(n(g)O = cA2(n(g)O = cW'P 2 (g)
for all g E GLn(A). Thuscp1(g) = 2= w'Pl ( (' 1) g)
1ENn-l (k)\GLn- 1 (k)= c L W <p 2 ( (^1 1 ) g) = ccp2 (g) ·
1ENn-l (k)\GLn-1 (k)
But then V7f 1 and V7f 2 have a non-trivial intersection. Since they are irreducible
representations, they must then coincide. D1.3. Kirillov models and the Strong Multiplicity One Theorem
The Multipli city One Theorem can be significantly strengthened. The Strong Mul-
tiplicity One Theorem is the following.Theorem (Strong Multiplicity One). Let (n 1 , V7fJ and (n2, V7f 2 ) be two cuspidal
representations of GLn(A). Suppose there is a finite set of places S such that for
all v eJ. S we have 7r1,v '.:::::'. 7r2,v· Then 7r1 = 7r2.
There are two proofs of this theorem. One is based on the theory of £-functions
and we will come to it in Lecture 4. The original proof of Piatetski-Shapiro [66] is
based on the Kirillov model of a local generic representation.
Let kv be a local field and let (nv, V7fJ be a n irreducible admissible smooth
generic representation of GLn (k v ), such as a local component of a cuspidal rep-
resentation ?r. Since ?rv is generic it has its Whittaker model W(nv, 'l/Jv)· Each
Whittaker function W E W(nv, 'l/Jv), since it is a function on GLn(kv), can be
restricted to the mirabolic subgroup Pn(kv). A fundamental result of Bernstein
and Zelevinsky in the non-archimedean case [1] and Jacquet and Shalika in the
archimedean case [45] says that the map ~v f-) W~vlPn(kv) is injective. Hence the
representation has a realization on a space of functions on P n ( kv). This is the
Kirillov model
K(nv, 'l/Jv) = {W(p)IW E W(nv, 'l/Jv)}.
P n ( kv ) acts naturally by right translation on IC ( 7r v, 'l/Jv) and the action of all of
GLn(kv ) can be obtained by transport of structure. But for now, it is the structure
of !C(n v, 'l/Jv) as a representation of P n(kv) which is of interest.For kv a non-archimedean field, let (Tv, V 7 J be the compactly induced repre-
sentation Tv = ind~:~~:~ ( 'l/Jv). Then Bernstein and Zelevinsky have analyzed the
representations of P 11 (k v) and shown that whenever ?rv is an irreducible admis-
sible generic representation of GLn(kv) then !C(nv,'l/Jv) contains V 7 v as a Pn(kv )
sub-representation and if ?rv is supercuspidal then !C(nv, 'l/Jv) = Vrv [l].
For kv archimedean, then we let ( Tv, V 7 J be the smooth vectors in the irre-
ducible smooth unitarily induced representation lnd~:~~:~('l/Jv)· Then Jacquet and
Shalika have shown that as long as ?rv is an irreducible admissible smooth uni-
tary representation of GLn(kv) then in fact !C(nv, 'l/Jv) = Vrv as representations of
Pn(kv ) [45, Remark 3.15].