Umbrella sampling 345
histogram obtained from each molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulation. Then,
the biased distribution is estimated by
P ̃(q,s(k))≈^1
nk∆q
H ̃k(q), (8.8.8)
wherenkis the number of configurations sampled in thekth simulation and ∆qis
the bin width used to compute the histogram. The statistical errorin the biased
distribution for thekth umbrella window is then ̃σ^2 k =ǫk(q)H ̃k(q)/(nk∆q), where
ǫk(q) measures the deviation as a function ofq between the numerically sampled
distribution and the true distributionP(q) in thekth umbrella window. The error in
Pk(q) is then given by the square of the unbiasing factor
σ^2 k= e−^2 β(Ak−A^0 )e^2 βW(q,s
(k))
σ ̃^2 k. (8.8.9)
We aim to minimize the total error
σ^2 =
∑n
k=1
Ck^2 (q)σk^2 (8.8.10)
subject to eqn. (8.8.7). The constraint can be imposed by means ofa Lagrange mul-
tiplierλ; the error function to be minimized is
Σ^2 =
∑n
k=1
Ck^2 (q)e−^2 β(Ak−A^0 )e^2 βW(q,s
(k))ǫk(q)H ̃k(q)
(nk∆q)
−λ
(n
∑
k=1
Ck(q)− 1
)
. (8.8.11)
Thus, setting the derivative∂Σ^2 /∂Ck(q) = 0 and solving forCk(q) in terms of the
Lagrange multiplier, we find
Ck(q) =
λnk∆q
2 ǫk(q)H ̃k(q)e−^2 β(Ak−A^0 )e^2 βW(q,s(k))
. (8.8.12)
The Lagrange multiplier is now determined by substituting eqn. (8.8.12) into eqn.
(8.8.7). This yields
λ
∑n
k=1
nk∆q
2 ǫk(q)H ̃k(q)e−^2 β(Ak−A^0 )e^2 βW(q,s(k))
= 1 (8.8.13)
so that
λ=
1
∑n
k=1nk∆q/[2ǫk(q)H ̃k(q)e−^2 β(Ak−A^0 )e^2 βW(q,s
(k))]. (8.8.14)
Substituting the Lagrange multiplier back into eqn. (8.8.12) gives thecoefficients as
Ck(q) =
nk/[ǫk(q)H ̃k(q)e−^2 β(Ak−A^0 )e^2 βW(q,s
(k))
]
∑n
j=1nj/[ǫj(q)
H ̃j(q)e−^2 β(Aj−A^0 )e^2 βW(q,s(j))]. (8.8.15)
At this point, we make two vital assumptions. First, we assume thatthe error
functionǫk(q) is the same in allnumbrella windows, which is tantamount to assuming