538 Chapter 8
Note 'rhe radius of convergence of 2:::"= 0 (aan + f3bn)zn can be.greater
than R = min(Ri, R 2 ). For instance, we have
yet
1 00
l-z = Lzn
n=O
for lzl < 1
for lzl < 1
·1 z
00
1
--- = L 2nzn
1 - Z (2 - Z )(1 - Z) n=O
for lzl < 2
the function on the left having a removable singularity at z = 1.
Theorem 8.7 Suppose that J(z) = E::"=o anzn for lzl < Ri and g(z) =
E::"=o bnzn for lzl < R2·· Then
00
f(z)g(z) = L CnZn (8.4-2)
n=O
where Cn = aobn + aibn-1 + · · · + anbo = E~=O akbn-k, the power series
on the right of (8.4-2) converging at least for lzl < R = min(R 1 , R 2 ).
Proof For any particular value of z such that lzl < R both series
E::"=o anzn and L:::"=o bnzn converge absolutely. Hence (8.4-2) follows from
Corollary 4.3.
Note Again, in this case the radius of conve~gence of E::"==o cnzn can be
greater than R = min(R 1 ,R 2 ). For example, we have
I+z 2 n
:--= 1+2z + 2z + · · · + 2z + · · · for Jzl < 1
1-z
and
for lzJ < 1
The coefficients of the product of the two series are c 0 = 1, c1 = c 2 = · · · =
en = 0 for all n 2:: 1, so that E::"=o CnZn = 1, which converges for all z.
Of course, the product of the two given functions is also 1, provided that
the singularities z = 1 and z = -1 are removed according to Riemann's
theorem.
Theorem 8.8 Suppose that J(z) = E::"=o anzn for Jzl < R 1 and g(z) =
E::"=o bnzn for Jzl < R2 with bo -:/= O. Let p = d(O, K) where K is the set of