Schöneberget al.,Science 362 , 1423–1428 (2018) 21 December 2018 4of6
A BDCEcomposite TDmembraneSnf7Vps4pipette vesicle tube bead
2 μmF Snf7Vps4membrane-67 s
15.9 pN45 s
22.5 pN172 s
47.6 pN208 s
37.0 pN269 s
47.3 pN422 s
0.0 pN-70 s
37.5 pN193 s
41.4 pN327 s
43.9 pN410 s
46.3 pN640 s
53.8 pN656 s
0.0 pNSnf7Vps4membranecompositeG011 0before scission after scissionfl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4 fl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4tube remnant on beadH
011 0before scission after scissionfl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4 fl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4tube remnant on beadI193 s
41.4 pN167 s
40.5 pN0 15 3005frequencytime to scission [min]2 μM, N=24
200 nM, N=1412 μM
200 nM
0
0 5 152010
time [min]norm. cum.
time to scissionJKSnf7 Vps4molecules in puncta
0200400600800compositeFig. 3. Confocal imaging of ATP-dependent mem-
brane tube scission by ESCRTs.(AtoE) Micrograph of
the experimental setup: the GUV (center, yellow) encap-
sulating the ESCRT module and caged ATP was aspirated
by a micropipette (left). A membrane nanotube was
pulled from the GUV using a bead (right) in an optical
trap. Membrane, Snf7, and Vps4 are labeled with different
fluorophores [composite (A) of individual channels shown
in (B to E)]. Scale bar: 2mm. (FandG) Progression of two
representative membrane scission events (2 of 17). UV
illumination att= 0 s. Snf7 (green) and Vps4 (cyan)
puncta became visible at the vesicle-tube junction and migrated into thetube. Scission happened at ~410 s and ~650 s, respectively. Scale bar:
1.5mm. (HandI) Tube remnants on the bead identified scission in the middle of the tube. [Brightness adjusted compared to (F) and (G).]
(J) Quantification of tube scission. (K) Protein copy numbers in puncta.
RESEARCH | REPORT
on December 20, 2018^http://science.sciencemag.org/Downloaded from