Schöneberget al.,Science 362 , 1423–1428 (2018) 21 December 2018 4of6
A BD
CE
composite TD
membrane
Snf7
Vps4
pipette vesicle tube bead
2 μm
F Snf7
Vps4
membrane
-67 s
15.9 pN
45 s
22.5 pN
172 s
47.6 pN
208 s
37.0 pN
269 s
47.3 pN
422 s
0.0 pN
-70 s
37.5 pN
193 s
41.4 pN
327 s
43.9 pN
410 s
46.3 pN
640 s
53.8 pN
656 s
0.0 pN
Snf7
Vps4
membrane
composite
G
011 0
before scission after scission
fl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4 fl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4
tube remnant on bead
H
011 0
before scission after scission
fl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4 fl. intensity M Snf7 Vps4
tube remnant on bead
I
193 s
41.4 pN
167 s
40.5 pN
0 15 30
0
5
frequency
time to scission [min]
2 μM, N=24
200 nM, N=14
1
2 μM
200 nM
0
0 5 152010
time [min]
norm. cum.
time to scission
JK
Snf7 Vps4
molecules in puncta
0
200
400
600
800
composite
Fig. 3. Confocal imaging of ATP-dependent mem-
brane tube scission by ESCRTs.(AtoE) Micrograph of
the experimental setup: the GUV (center, yellow) encap-
sulating the ESCRT module and caged ATP was aspirated
by a micropipette (left). A membrane nanotube was
pulled from the GUV using a bead (right) in an optical
trap. Membrane, Snf7, and Vps4 are labeled with different
fluorophores [composite (A) of individual channels shown
in (B to E)]. Scale bar: 2mm. (FandG) Progression of two
representative membrane scission events (2 of 17). UV
illumination att= 0 s. Snf7 (green) and Vps4 (cyan)
puncta became visible at the vesicle-tube junction and migrated into thetube. Scission happened at ~410 s and ~650 s, respectively. Scale bar:
1.5mm. (HandI) Tube remnants on the bead identified scission in the middle of the tube. [Brightness adjusted compared to (F) and (G).]
(J) Quantification of tube scission. (K) Protein copy numbers in puncta.
RESEARCH | REPORT
on December 20, 2018^
http://science.sciencemag.org/
Downloaded from