40 | New Scientist | 9 November 2019
uncannily like modern creatures. “We used
to be obsessed with the Ediacaran-Cambrian
boundary,” says Simon Darroch at Vanderbilt
University in Tennessee. “Now it’s looking
smoother than previously thought.”
Perhaps the most compelling clues
come from rocks in Newfoundland, Canada,
that contain traces of the earliest Ediacaran
communities. Here, you don’t just stumble
on the occasional nicely preserved
specimen – you walk over bedrock exposures
120 square metres in area that each contain
thousands of fossils.
Each giant slab is a Pompeii-like snapshot
of the deep-sea floor community as it
was 570 million years ago. “It’s absolutely
astonishing in terms of preservation,” says
Emily Mitchell at the University of Cambridge.
It is what the rocks reveal about Ediacaran
organisms that really surprised her, though.
Mitchell and her colleagues mapped the size
and distribution of fossils of an oval-shaped
rangeomorph called Fractofusus. This
Ediacaran grew up to 40 centimetres in length
and was covered in peculiar, fractally repeating
pleats. The data, published in 2015, showed that
the largest individuals were scattered randomly
across the ancient sea floor, surrounded by
halos of smaller and smaller individuals.
This suggests that Fractofusus reproduced in
a sophisticated way. It generated waterborne
offspring that would drift and land on an
empty bit of sea floor. Then, as the offspring
developed into adults, each would form a
series of tentacle-like fingers, the ends of which
would then grow into a clone of the adult.
Surprisingly modern
That is a little like how certain modern
deep-sea animals such as sponges and corals
reproduce, says Mitchell. Fractofusus may
have had a fractal-like anatomy unlike that
of any modern animal, but it apparently
reproduced like some of today’s animals
do. That might hint that it was related to
those animals, although Mitchell says we
can’t rule out the possibility that Fractofusus
was instead related to fungi, which sometimes
also reproduce this way.
In any case, it isn’t just Fractofusus that
behaved surprisingly like a modern animal.
Another Ediacaran organism called Kimberella
left behind tracks that suggest it trundled
around, grazing on microbial mats on the
sea floor, which is a strikingly animal-like way
to behave. Darroch and his colleagues have
used computer models to show that another
Ediacaran, Tribrachidium, probably fed on
suspended particles, just as many modern
shellfish do. In a sense, it doesn’t even matter
whether these Ediacaran organisms were
animals or not: they were behaving and
reproducing like modern marine animals do,
which suggests that Ediacaran ecology was
more like today’s than we previously thought.
There might also be good reason to believe
that at least some strange Ediacaran organisms
really were animals. The strongest evidence
for this came last year. Ilya Bobrovskiy at the
Australian National University in Canberra
and his colleagues analysed the chemistry of
rocks containing an Ediacaran organism called
Dickinsonia. The rock around the fossils had
a chemical signature associated with algae,
which would make sense because the shallow
sea floor on which Dickinsonia lived was
probably coated in mats of algae. But the
molecules within the fossils themselves
included a particular type of steroid that
is produced only by animals, implying that
Dickinsonia was an animal.
These conclusions don’t necessarily lead
to a defusing of the Cambrian explosion.
Some people suspect that the Ediacaran
animals didn’t give rise to modern ones.
635 Million years ago 539 485
Kimberella
Yilingia
Pushing back the clock
We used to think that animals burst onto the scene in an abrupt “explosion” of complex life
during the Cambrian period. However, new discoveries are revealing animal-like creatures
in the earlier Ediacaran period
Fractofusus Marella
Anomalocaris
Hallucigenia
Reproduced much like
modern deep-sea
animals like sponges
Trundled around
the sea floor
grazing on
microbial mats
Segmented creature with
primitive legs, possibly an
early arthropod
Ediacaran Cambrian
“ There probably
wasn’t a Cambrian
explosion worthy of
the name after all”