DK - The American Civil War

(やまだぃちぅ) #1
attacked waiter Thomas Keating,
triggering a dining room melee that
ended with Herbert shooting the waiter
dead. The Republicans printed
handbills, speeches, and pamphlets
stressing slaveholders’ disdain for
“menials” and portraying the attack as
a blow against white workers and
farmers. Party editors quoted
inflammatory items from the
Southern press as proof of the
tyrannical nature of slaveholders.
Two weeks later, on May 22,
Senator Charles Sumner of
Massachusetts was brutally beaten
on the floor of the Senate by a
Southern congressman, Preston
Brooks. Republicans, joined by a
number of former Democrats,
organized “indignation meetings” that
drew thousands of Northern men and
women into public condemnation of
the assault.

A climate of fear
That same evening, reports arrived that
Lawrence, Kansas, the center of
free-state settlers, had been sacked and
burned by pro-slavery militia from
Missouri. Stories circulated of murder,
pillage, and rape, but in fact the only
casualty was a
Missouri raider,
killed by a brick
falling from a
burning hotel.
Confrontations
over slavery in
Kansas suddenly became part of a
larger pattern of violence. Previously
skeptical opponents of the Republicans
now accepted that “The Slave Power
is the same in Missouri as it is in
Washington.” These violent acts seemed

AN IMPERFECT UNION

I


n May 1856, three violent events—
two in Washington, D.C., and one in
Kansas—convinced many white
Northerners that the South really did
constitute a threat to their rights and
liberties. The unconnected events
inspired Northern enthusiasm for the
Republican Party—founded just two
years earlier by a coalition that included
abolitionists, former anti-slavery Whigs,
and former Free-Soilers—and led to a
sudden surge in support for the party.
On May 8, Alabama-born
Congressman Philemon Herbert,
furious when he was refused service at
the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.,

BEFORE


In the 1850s, anti-Catholicism and concerns
about both slavery and immigration drew
Americans to new political parties.

NEW POLITICAL PARTIES
As the Whig party faded, local nativist groups
organized into the anti-immigration “Know
Nothing” Party ❮❮ 30–31. At the same time,
many Northerners who advocated “Free Soil”
in the West joined anti-Southern and anti-slavery
coalitions that became the Republican Party.

SLAVE POWER
Many Northerners feared the expansion of
slavery into the West. Southern political power
was frequently characterized as a conspiracy or
“Slave Power.” These perceived threats to
white liberties in the North mobilized popular
support for the Republicans more than any moral
commitment to the abolition of slavery and
justice for African Americans ❮❮ 26–27.

to prove Republican assertions of
Southern “Slave Power” and its threat
to white men, whether they were
laborers, settlers, or senators.
The failure of the president, the
Congress, and the courts to render
justice as demanded by an enraged
Northern public added indignity to
a sense of imminent danger. The
Republican Party took advantage of
this and used an extensive network
of editors, ministers, and party workers
to print and
distribute a vast
amount of political
propaganda. The
Southern press
retaliated. In May
1856, the Enquirer
in Richmond, Virginia, urged that
“vulgar abolitionists ... must be lashed
into submission.” Later that year,
an Alabama editor fumed, “Free
society, we sicken at the name ... a
conglomeration of greasy mechanics,

filthy operatives, small-fisted farmers,
and moonstruck theorists ... hardly fit
for association with a Southern
gentleman’s body servant.” Such
provocative statements only served to
remind Northerners that Republicans
stood ready to defend their interests
against the South.

Rapidly growing support
Heated debates and political violence
erupted over what party was fit to rule.
The rapid spread of anger at Southern
attitudes about slavery enabled the
Republican Party to attract both
abolitionists and moderates willing
to vote against Southern institutions
and culture.
The aim of stopping the expansion
of slavery unified the Republican Party.
Slave holders cringed at this political
dogma, given the increase of
populations in the North and West.
Southerners feared losing the political
balance in Congress, which protected
their interests. They knew that slavery
ultimately would be subjected to the
will of the majority.
For a party that had been founded
as recently as 1854, the Republicans
achieved a remarkable result in their
first presidential election. Their
candidate John C. Frémont carried 11
states to Democratic candidate James
Buchanan’s 19. The 1856 election was
seen by them as a “victorious defeat.”

The Rise of the Republican Party


Founded to oppose the extension of slavery, the Republican Party in 1855 had organized members in fewer


than half the Northern states, most of which often ran third to the Democrats in elections. Less than a year later,


the Republicans had transformed themselves from a disorganized coalition into a powerful sectional party.


On May 19–20, 1856, Charles Sumner
delivered a two-day speech in the
Senate attacking slavery and its sexual
abuses. Two days later Congressman
Preston Brooks of South Carolina,
having read the text of the speech,
was so enraged that he marched into
the Senate and attacked Sumner at his

desk, beating him unconscious with his
cane, which shattered as a result of the
violent blows. Brooks believed that
Sumner’s speech had slandered his uncle,
Senator Andrew Butler.
This unprecedented attack on the Senate
floor shocked Northerners, who considered
it an assault on free speech. Republicans
used the attack to create effective campaign
rhetoric “proving” the threat to Northern
liberties posed by Southern slaveholders.

Forcing slavery down the throat of a Free-Soiler
The Free-Soil Party opposed the spread of slavery in the
West. This cartoon refers to the divisive Kansas-Nebraska
Act of 1854, after which many Free-Soilers chose to join
the emerging Republican Party.

THE SUMNER CANING, A
PROVOCATIVE EXAMPLE
OF SOUTHERN CHIVALRY

The number
of popular
votes for the Republican candidate John
C. Frémont in the presidential election of
1856 : 33.1 percent of the votes cast.

1,342,345


KEY MOMENT

THE CANING OF MASSACHUSETTS SENATOR CHARLES SUMNER

Free download pdf