Financial Times Europe - 02.11.2019 - 03.11.2019

(Grace) #1
10 ★ FT Weekend 2 November/3 November 2019

Books


T


he profound and the inane
alike are debated on Quora,
a website where the curious
(or plain bored) can pose
questions to the internet
hive mind.Renaissance Technologies, a
fabled yet secretive hedge fund, is one of
the subjects that occasionally piques
interest. Last year, a rivalrecounted
how he had once nearly poached some-
one from Renaissance, only to be sty-
mied at the last minute. “I read about
him years later,” the Quora contributor
wrote. “He bought an Alp. As in... an
actual mountain in Austria.”
The story has no doubtgrown in the
retelling. Nonetheless, it is a vivid exam-
ple of the awestruck fascination that
Renaissance commands in finance.
Machines and algorithms have taken
over swaths of markets, supplanting the
grizzled traders of public perception,
and no one has harnessedcomputer sci-
ence and vast data sets to invest as suc-
cessfully as Renaissance. “It’s the gold
standard of computer trading,” one
rival once ruefully admitted to me.
Despite its success, the hedge fund
and its founder Jim Simons have largely
remained an enigma. Even most people
in finance would struggle to identify

Simons out of a line-up of similarly
disheveled octogenarians. Indeed, his
chain-smoking, silver beard, wryness
and reluctance to wear socks all make
him seem more like a Coen Brothers
character than a colossus of investing.
There has been the odd carefully cho-
sen interview, but a quip to Seed Maga-
zine in 2006 captured his views on fame.
Quoting Benjamin, Animal Farm’s wise
old donkey, Simons said: “‘God gave me
a tail to keep off the flies. But I’d rather
have had no tail and no flies.’ So, that’s
kind of the way I feel about publicity.”
Yet inThe Man Who Solved the Market,
Gregory Zuckerman lifts the lid on the
most fascinating man in financial mar-
kets: aliberal mathematician who once
motorcycled from Boston to Bogotá,
was ejected from the Soviet code-crack-
ing team at the InstituteforDefense
Analyses for opposing the Vietnam war,
and then built the most relentless of
moneymaking machines.
Zuckerman estimates Renaissance
has generated over $100bn in trading
profits since 1988 — more than any
other hedge fund in history — making
millionaires of many of its employees,
and several billionaires. Forbes puts
Simons’ fortune at above $21bn,leaving
other hedge fund magnates and finan-
ciers such as Ray Dalio, George Soros
and Stephen Schwarzman trailing.
Quantitative finance — as it isdubbed
— may seem a recondite subject to many
people, but it is profoundly reshaping
the investment industry, and thuscapi-
talism itself. And Renaissance is the
shining example of what can be
achieved by applying modern techno-
logy, big data and lots of brainy people.
More broadly, however, Renaissance
is also emblematic of an era where tech-

nology helps money and power accrue
to an increasingly small number of peo-
ple. The choices that these people make
can reverberate globally. While Simons
has become one of the world’s biggest
backers of scientific research and phi-
lanthropy — and a host of Democratic
politicians —his former colleague Rob-
ert Mercer has funnelled his billions into
the far-right Breitbart News, the elec-
tion of Donald Trump and Cambridge
Analytica, the political consultancy.
The Wall Street Journal journalist
details many of the bumps, personal
and professional, along the way. Renais-
sance’s first years were spent in a poky
office in a Long Island strip mall. Regu-

Jim Simons, founder of hedge fund Renaissance Technologies, pictured in 2011 —Eyevine

Algorithm for our times


Robin Wigglesworth pplauds an account ofa ne ofo


the more enigmatic figures infinancial markets


T


he memoirs of the
British aristocracy
are, by and large,
almost as dire as
those, by and large,
written by an equally vainglori-
ous breed: our politicians. Not so
this one.
The sales pitch is wholesomely
unvarnished. On the first page,
Lady Glenconner, Princess Mar-
garet’s lady-in-waiting for 30
years, explains that Helena Bon-
ham Carter, playing HRH in the
third series ofThe Crown airing(
this month) visited her earlier
this year to get a few tips. Later,
the actress penned a graceful note
to say that she hoped she, too,
would benefit from the royal con-
nection.Moved, the author
decided to publish her own recol-
lections of the princess. Written
with impressive speed, given the
research needed to describe all
the ceremonies, guest lists and
costumes (“made from ivory silk
with gold embroidery... they
looked sublime”),Lady in Waiting
provides a perfectly timed
accompaniment to the new series.
To be more generous, the
author, aged 87 and completely
untutored in book-writing, has
produced a candid, witty andstyl-
ish memoir. It is as richly spiced
with malice — I doubt if Bianca
Jagger will relish the put-down of
her own princessy ways, or Jerry
Hall the spiky comments on her
lack of social grace — as it is dark-

ened by the tragedies that befell
the author’s three sons, two of
whom predeceased her. But the
glory of this book — a banquet of
imperious egos — derives from
her reports from the front on life
with Princess Margaret and life

with, and quite often, without,
her own late husband. In picking
prizes for selfish awfulness of the
kind that turns a disrespectful
reader’s mind to guillotines, it’s
hard to know which of these two
entertaining monsters would
merit first place in the tumbril.
Let’s start with Colin Tennant.
The author is not reticent about
reminding us how much posher
she, the oldest daughter of the
Earl of Leicester, was than a hand-
some spouse who ranked no
higher than the beaters at her
father’s Holkham shooting-
parties. She had already enter-
prisingly acted as a pottery sales-
woman for her mother’s wares.
She’d also — the description is
extensive — helped to carry the
Queen’s train at the coronation in


  1. (Both the Queen and her sis-
    ter looked“straight out of a fairy-
    tale”.) The author’s wedding hreet
    years later went well, with nice
    presents from the royals: an ink-
    well from the Queen, a gold om-c
    pact mirror from her mother. The
    honeymoon began less auspi-
    ciously with a visit to a French
    brothel for sexa quatre. (The
    author declined.) Proceeding to a
    cockfight in Cuba, where the cock
    mistook her for its opponent and
    clawed blood from her scalp, it
    ended with her being slammed
    against a wall for beating her hus-
    band at cards.
    “Eccentricity ran in the family,”
    she writes, before treating us to a
    lively history of Tennant fore-
    bears and their amusing ways of
    making people miserable. “I like
    making them frightened,” Colin
    explained. Asked why he married


her, he said he knew she’d never
give up.
He met his match in Princess
Margaret. A regular visitor and
eventual home-owner on his Car-
ibbean island, the princess was
the only person — apart from his
children’s nanny — who could
control the awfulhissy fits of her
attention-seeking host.
Margaret, the author writes,
had been the only royal capable fo
subduing the equally fearsome
rages of her father, George VI.
And in the author, whom she had
known since childhood, Margaret
found the only woman willing to
tolerate her own odd whims —
“Go, Anne, get them!” she
shouted as the author followed
orders to hose down Princess
Michael’s cats— and endure her
royal tantrums.
This is a more nuanced portrait
of Margaret than Craig Brown’s
mischievous tour de force,Ma’am
Darling. We see HRH beaming
alongside a near-nakeddancer
and crowning Lord Glenconner as
“King of Mustique.”
But we also ee her laying fires,s
cleaning cars and washing dishes
— all in her own rubber gloves —
for her beloved friend.
Amid the madness of it all,
moments of real pathos glimmer
through a sparkling surface. In
1993, the princess invited her first
love, Peter Townsend, tolunch.
Watching from the window, the
author saw a very old man climb
slowly out ofhis car.
“How did it go?”, Glenconner
asked her afterwards.
“He hasn’t changed at all,” she
replied.

A crown of egos


A candid, witty memoir by Princess Margaret’s lady-
in-waiting is spiced with malice. ByMiranda Seymour

Lady In
Waiting: My
Extraordinary
Life in the
Shadow of
the Crown
by Anne
Glenconner
Hodder &
Stoughton £20
336 pages

S


tories matter. It’s a truism for
journalists, but not so much
for economists. Robert Shiller,
the Yale professor and Nobel
laureate whopredicted the
housing crisis and also put behavioural
economics on themap, aims to change
that in a book dedicated to thethriving
field of narrative economics.
While many economists are still busy
creating mathematical formulas to
decode and contextualise our suppos-
edly “rational” behaviour, people’s
actions are more often based on human
interest stories than hard data. “When
we are asleep at night,” he points out,
“narratives appear to us in the form of
dreams. We do not dream of equations
or geometric figures without some
human element.”
The idea that human behaviour can
exert its own influence in the market is
something that most traders would buy
into (investor George Soros turned it
into a theory that he called “reflexiv-
ity”). But inNarrative Economics, Shiller
goesmuch broader and deeper, looking
at how the stories we tell ourselves
about the world drive our behaviour —
and thus the world itself if enough peo-
ple buy into them.Economists, he
argues, need to study this if they are to
have any hope of doing a better job than
they have in the past of predicting major
events — such as recessions or asset bub-
bles — and how peoplereact to them.
Consider, for example, the fall in stock
prices that began after Austria-Hungary
declared war on Serbia on July 28, 1914.
New York and the major European
exchanges reactedby closing their
doors. That only increased panic, con-
tributing to activities such as the ship-
ping of large quantities of gold from the
US to Europe, which in turn increased
the danger on major transatlantic ship-
ping routes. This itself was driven by a
narrative that took hold among jittery
Europeans around the Panic of 1907,
which many held up as proof that Amer-
ica was unstable and they should get
their money out as fast as possible.
Given all this, why did markets not
close after Britain declared war on Ger-
many on September 3, 1939? In part
because of a widely shared story that the
first world war had ultimately proved to
be very profitable for investors who had
kept their US assets, and thus were able
to make money selling supplies to Euro-
peans during the war. One result of this
narrative was that the S&P index gained
9.6 per cent afterwar was declared.
All this seems so fuzzy — how can we
sift through any of the millions of narra-
tives floating around at any particular
moment, particularly in our world of
high-speed data, and find those that
have meaning and will go viral? (Like
diseases, narratives must spread widely
in order to be economically relevant.)
It turns out that there is some connec-
tive tissue in terms of what spreads.
Novelty often catches on — Shiller
explains how the “Happy Birthday”

Narrative
Economics:
How Stories
Go Viral and
Drive Major
Economic
Events
by Robert Shiller
Princeton $27.95/
£20, 400 pages

Stories of value


A Nobel laureate explores why the tales we tell ourselves
can be a potent force in economics. ByRana Foroohar

The Man Who
Solved the
Market: How
Jim Simons
Launched
the Quant
Revolution
by Gregory
Zuckerman
Portfolio $30/£20,
384 pages

lators once came calling afterrecom-
mendations spat out by the early algo-
rithms saw Renaissance nearly cor-
nered the potato market.
Failure often loomed. When Renais-
sance’s first foray into bond markets
turned into big losses, Simons admitted
to a colleague that “sometimes I look at
this and feel I’m just some guy who
doesn’t really know what he’s doing”.
Later, the increasing notoriety ofMer-
cer caused consternation nternally andi
externally. More tragically, two of
Simons’ sons died in accidents, leaving
the hedge fund manager devastated.
Yet Renaissance has enjoyed a golden
run the likes of which investing has
never seen. When it notched up its first
$1m one-day profit in 1990, Simons
handed out champagne — but $1m one-
day gains quickly “became so frequent
that the drinking got a bit out of hand”,
according to Zuckerman. Today, it
wouldn’tcreate a murmur at Renais-
sance’s East Setauket headquarters, let
alone the clink of champagne glasses.
For all Simons’ undoubted brilliance,
the book makes clear that his skill was
not inventingcomplex trading models

H


ow much evidence
d o y o u n e e d t o
believe that a poten-
tial emergency is
really serious? What
will convince you to act in the face
of impending disaster?
Those questions lie at the heart
of Jonathan Safran Foer’s remark-
able book. His subject is ostensi-
bly the climate crisis and, in par-
ticular, a plea to eat less meat and
dairy food. If you can’t go wholly
vegan, then at least resist animal
products at breakfast and lunch
and restrict them to dinner.
YetWe Are the Weather ontainsc
little actual analysis of the contri-
bution of animal agriculture to
global warming — probably 20-25
per cent — and how this compares
with other factors that individual
actions can change, such as driv-
ing less, using public transport,
insulating your home and turning
the thermostat down in winter
and up in summer.
Foer is an innovative writer
whoseskills are deployed here
most effectively in analysing what
motivates people to sacrifice
short-term comfort and conven-
ience for the sake of salvation in
the longer term — and what
makes them believe a crisis is real
at an emotional level rather than
acknowledging it intellectually
and carrying on regardless.
Climate change is affecting the
weather now — though far greater
impacts lie ahead.After listing

“some upsetting statistics” about
a warmer world in the late 21st
century, Foer comments: “The
horrific future they describe will
be acknowledged by most readers
of this book and believed by few.”
He then admits that he, deep
down, oesn’t believe them eitherd
— or at least not enough to decar-
bonise his life beyonda largely
vegan diet. He aims to draw les-
sons from elsewhere, particularly
history, that mightmotivate col-
lective actionby spurringemo-
tional engagement.
The most powerful stories
come from the second world war,
on both a personal and commu-
nal level. Foer exists because his
grandmother,then 20, fled east
before theGerman army reached
her Polish village. She believed
storiesof what the Nazis would do
to Jews andescaped the Holo-
caust, unlike most of her family
and neighbours. Then, in 1943,
Polish underground hero Jan Kar-
ski met US Supreme Court justice
Felix Frankfurter, a prominent

Any appetite for change?


Our dietsignificantly affects climate. Changing that
requires more than new food choices. ByClive Cookson

We Are the
Weather:
Saving the
Planet Begins
at Breakfast
by Jonathan
Safran Foer
Hamish Hamilton
£16.99, 288 pages

song, which used the same tune as an
earlier piece of music, was much more
successful because it allows us to place
our own name in the lyrics.
There are also several timeless narra-
tives that seem to come back again and
again, mutating for each new era. Fear
and hope around technology are both
common, as are moral narratives such
asthe need for thriftiness, which Shiller
believes helped prolong the Great
Depression, or stories based on strong
emotions such asanger against interest
groups that are perceived to be selfish or
out of touch —like corrupt unions in the
past, or rich people today.
These stories, says Shiller, shape pol-

icy. In 1957, for example, a 3.7 per cent
rise in inflation from the year before —
significant in today’s terms but nothing
like the 23.6 per cent rise in 1920 — cre-
ated a strong crackdown by central
bankers in the US and elsewhere, thanks
in part to an LA Times editorial that
detailed the misdeeds of selfish union
bosses. Allan Sproul, the recently
retired president of the Fed at that time,
lamented that the “Federal Reserve Sys-
tem finds itself in the position of having
to validate, however reluctantly, public
folly and private greedby supporting
increased costs and prices”.
One might write a narrative of the
past 10 years involving desperate cen-
tral bankers trying to paper over the
misdeeds of selfish and myopic politi-
cians by keeping rates low and unwit-
tingly brewing up a huge asset bubble
and higher inequality. But can we actu-
ally quantify the effect of narrative eco-
nomics? Not easily, says Shiller. He calls
for more data — in the form of inter-
views that question people about the
stories they tell each other and them-
selves, and a database of sermons that
capture the most important passion
plays of the day.
Believing that easy money will soon
give way to a market crash is certainly
one. If Shiller is right, the more we
believe it, the more likely it will be.

Rana Foroohar is the FT’s global
business columnist

A current narrative might


involve central bankers


desperately papering over


the misdeeds of politicians


American Jew, to providefirst-
hand evidence of Nazi extermin-
ation policies. “I must say I am
unable to believe what you told
me,” Frankfurter replied. When
pressed by Karski’s colleague, the
judge added: “I didn’t say that this
young man is lying... My mind,
my heart, they are made in such a
way that I cannot accept it.”
Yet most Americans signed up
with enthusiasm for the war
itself. Foer is interesting on the
measures taken to immerse civil-
ians in a conflict whose horrors
were far out of sight ut whereb
victory would require collective
action. Nightly blackouts were
practised across the US in places
where enemy aircraft could not
reach, and people accepted food
rationing, high taxes and a 35mph
national speed limit — and they
responded with huge increases in
productivity, while16m Ameri-
cans enlisted in a military effort
that drove the Allies to victory.
Sadly,Foer’s rather disjointed
jumble of brilliance does notcon-
clude with a sparkling idea for
how to engage everyone emotion-
ally in the world war against
warming. There has been some
progress ince Foer finisheds writ-
inghis book, with the emergence
of Extinction Rebellion and cli-
mate strikes inspired by Greta
Thunberg. But the majority of
people who accept the idea that
human activity iscausing climate
change will need to do far more on
the home front than forsaking
meat and milkuntil dinner.

Clive Cookson is the FT’s
science editor

Renaissance shows what


you can do by applying


technology, big data and


lots of brainy people


and algorithms himself. His talent was
to spot, nurture and harness beautiful
but often combustible minds such as
James Ax, Lenny Baum, Elwyn Berle-
kamp, Henry Laufer, Peter Brown and
Mercer. One person describes Renais-
sance’s motley group of scientists and
mathematicians as “a bunch of Shel-
dons”, a reference to the socially inept
but brainy star ofThe Big Bang Theory.
The book has some imperfections —
primarily thatZuckerman does not
usehis detailed reporting as a scaffold-
ing to tell an even bigger story of how the
business of investing has evolved over
the past half-century.
While Simons was still toiling away as
a codebreaker and frustrated academic,
a bunch of brilliant financial economists
werelaying the groundwork for today’s
era of algorithmic markets. Simons may
be the quant industry’s paragon, but he
is far from its only giant. Yet aside from a
sprinkling of historical context,The Man
Who Solved the Market s overwhelm-i
ingly focused on Simons, Renaissance
and its eclectic eggheads. An occasional
nod to the broader perspective would
have enhanceda vivid tale of one of the
biggest actors in one of the biggest sto-
ries of our time: how machines con-
quered financial markets.For years
Simons has been the white whale of
many financial reporters. In Zucker-
man he has met his Ahab.

Robin Wigglesworth is the
FT’s global finance correspondent

Lady Anne Glenconner

NOVEMBER 2 2019 Section:Weekend Time: 10/201931/ - 16:50 User:andrew.higton Page Name:WKD10, Part,Page,Edition:WKD, 10, 1

Free download pdf