BUSINESSCLASSIFIED
TOPLACEANADCALL:1- 866 -999-9 237
EMAIL:[email protected]
LEGALS
©2019Ernst&YoungInc.Allrightsreserved.
Notice is hereby given that the bankruptcy of Carrot Insights Inc.
occurred on the 6th day of October 2019 and that the First
Meeting of Creditors will be held on the 23rd day of October 2019
at the hour of 10:00 a.m. at the EY Tower, 100 Adelaide St. W.,
40th Floor Toronto, ON.
Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 16th day of October 2019.
EY Tower
100 Adelaide St. W.
Toronto, Ontario M5J 0B3
Contact: Franca Mazzulla
Telephone: 416 943-2202
Facsimile: 416 943 3300
Email: [email protected]
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY OF
CARROT INSIGHTS INC
DIVIDENDS
Dividends
Notice is hereby given that the following dividend has been declared.
Issuer Issue RecordDate PayableDate Rate
Bombardier Inc. Preferred October 31, 2019 November 15, 2019 Floating
Series 2
MEETING NOTICES BUSINESS TO BUSINESS
MADALENA
ENERGYINC.
aFFouFcEsaFAFFual
aFdS0EcialMEEtiFg
omSha/EholdE/stobE
hEldNovEsbE/22,
2019.ThEREco/dDatE
isOctobE/ 23 ,2019.
INVESTMENTOPPORTUNITIES
Partner/Investor wantedto con-
vert urban retail/commercial
buildings to residential rentals.
Minimum $50k investment.
[email protected]
Reporton
Business
TOSUBSCRIBE1- 866 - 999 - 9237
TGAM.CA/SUBSCRIBE
B8| RE-ORTONBUSINESS O THEGLOBEANDMAIL| WEDNESDAY,OCTOBER16,2019
The U.S.-China trade war will cut
2019 global growth to its slowest
pace since the 2008-09 financial
crisis, the International Moneta-
ry Fund warned on Tuesday, but
said output would rebound if
their duelling tariffs were re-
moved.
The IMF said its latest World
Economic Outlook projections
show 2019 GDP growth at 3 per
cent, down from 3.2 per cent in a
July forecast, largely owing to in-
creasing fallout from global trade
friction.
The forecasts set a gloomy
backdrop for the IMF and World
Bank annual meetings this week
in Washington, the first for the
Fund’s new managing director,
Kristalina Georgieva. She is in-
heriting a range of problems,
from stagnating trade to unrest
in Ecuador and political backlash
in Argentina over IMF-mandated
austerity programs.
Without a nearly simultane-
ous easing of monetary policy by
major central banks, IMF chief
economist Gita Gopinath said
global growth would be half a
percentage point lower in 2019 –
at 2.5 per cent, teetering on the
edge of widespread recession.
“The weakness in growth is
driven by a sharp deterioration
in manufacturing activity and
global trade, with higher tariffs
and prolonged trade policy un-
certainty damaging investment
and demand for capital goods,”
Ms. Gopinath said.
The global crisis lender said
that by 2020, announced tariffs
would reduce global economic
output by 0.8 per cent. That
translates to a loss of about
US$700-billion – the equivalent
of making Switzerland’s econo-
my disappear.
The growth downgrade as-
sumes that all announced U.S.
tariffs on Chinese goods are put
in place, along with Chinese re-
taliation. These include a five-
percentage-point U.S. duty in-
crease on Chinese goods original-
ly scheduled for Tuesday and 10-
per-cent tariffs on US$156-billion
in Chinese goods scheduled for
Dec. 15.
If these incremental moves are
scrapped completely by a U.S.-
China trade deal, the global GDP
loss would shrink to 0.6 per cent,
Ms. Gopinath said. She added
that all output would rebound by
0.8 per cent if all U.S. and Chinese
tariffs were removed.
Services were still strong
across much of the world, but
there were some signs of soften-
ing in that sector in the United
States and Europe, the IMF said.
For 2020, the Fund said global
growth was set to pick up to 3.4
per cent owing to expectations of
better performances in Brazil,
Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia and
Turkey. But this forecast was a
10th of a point lower than in July
and was vulnerable to downside
risks, including worse trade ten-
sions, Brexit-related disruptions
and an abrupt aversion to risk in
financial markets.
If Britain were to leave the Eu-
ropean Union with no customs
deal in place, it would cut Bri-
tain’s GDP output level by as
much as 5 per cent in the next
two years and 3 per cent in the
longer term, Ms. Gopinath said.
The World Economic Outlook
report spells out in sharp detail
the economic difficulties caused
by the U.S.-China tariffs, includ-
ing direct costs, market turmoil,
reduced investment and lower
productivity owing to supply
chain disruptions.
The IMF said foreign direct in-
vestment abroad by advanced
economies came to “a virtual
standstill” in 2018 after increas-
ing in earlier years to average
more than 3 per cent of global
gross domestic product annually
- or more than US$1.8-trillion.
The institution said the de-
cline of some US$1.5-trillion be-
tween 2017 and 2018 reflected
purely financial operations by
large multinational corpora-
tions, including in response to
changes in U.S. tax law.
Global vehicle purchases fell
by 3 per cent in 2018, reflecting a
drop in demand in China after
expiration of tax incentives and
production adjustments after
adoption of new emissions stan-
dards in Germany and other euro
zone countries.
Global trade growth reached
just 1 per cent in the first half of
2019, the weakest level since
2012, weighed down by higher
tariffs and prolonged uncertainty
about trade policies, as well as a
slump in the automobile indus-
try.
After expanding by 3.6 per
cent in 2018, the IMF now pro-
jects global trade volume will in-
crease just 1.1 per cent in 2019, 1.4
percentage points less than it
forecast in July and 2.3 percent-
age points less than forecast in
April.
Trade growth was expected to
rebound to 3.2 per cent in 2020,
however risks remained “skewed
to the downside,” the IMF said,
with a significant drag on both
the U.S. and Chinese economies.
New IMF projections show
China’s GDP output falling 2 per
cent in the near term under the
current tariff scenario and 1 per
cent in the long term, while U.S.
output would decline 0.6 per
cent over both time spans.
“To rejuvenate growth, policy-
makers must undo the trade bar-
riers put in place with durable
agreements, rein in geopolitical
tensions and reduce domestic
policy uncertainty,” Ms. Gopi-
nath said.
But she was cautious about
U.S. President Donald Trump’s
announcement on Friday about
the first phase of a U.S. trade deal
with China, saying that more de-
tails were needed about the “ten-
tative” deal.
The IMF also modelled what
would happen if multinational
firms in the United States, euro
zone and Japan reshored enough
production to reduce nominal
imports by 10 per cent. The lend-
er found that it would drive up
consumer prices and reduce do-
mestic demand, while throttling
the spread of technology to
emerging economies.
REUTERS
U.S.-China spatrisksslowergrowth,IMFsays
Organizationcutsglobal
GDPoutlookfor2019
to3%from3.2%,largely
overtariff-warfallout
DAVIDLAWDER
ANDREASHALALWASHINGTON
IMFchiefeconomistGitaGopinath,seeninWashingtononTuesday,saysthatwithoutanearlysimultaneouseasingofmonetarypolicybybigcentral
banks,globalgrowthwouldfallto2.5percentin2019,teeteringontheedgeofwidespreadrecession.OLI9IERDOULIERY/AFP9IAGETTYIMAGES
Royal Dutch Shell PLCstill sees abundant op-
portunity to make money from oil and gas in
coming decades even as investors and govern-
ments increase pressure on energy companies
over climate change, its chief executive said.
But in an interview with Reuters, Ben van
Beurden expressed concern that some share-
holders could abandon the world’s second-
largest listed energy company owing partly to
what he called the “demonization” of oil and
gas and “unjustified” worries that its business
model was unsustainable.
The 61-year-old Dutch executive in recent
years became one of the sector’s most promi-
nent voices advocating action over global
warming in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate
agreement.
Shell, which supplies around 3 per cent of
the world’s energy, set out in 2017
a plan to halve the intensity of its
greenhouse emissions by the
middle of the century, based in
large part on building one of the
world’s biggest power businesses.
Still, the amount of carbon
dioxide emitted from Shell’s op-
erations and the products it sells
rose by 2.5 per cent between 2017
and 2018.
A defiant Mr. van Beurden re-
jected a rising chorus from cli-
mate activists and parts of the in-
vestor community to transform
radically the 112-year-old Anglo-
Dutch company’s traditional business model.
“Despite what a lot of activists say, it is en-
tirely legitimate to invest in oil and gas because
the world demands it,” Mr. van Beurden said.
“We have no choice” but to invest in long-life
projects, he added.
Shell and its peers have long insisted that
switching away from oil and gas to cleaner
sources of energy will take decades as demand
for transport and plastics continues to in-
crease. Investors have warned, however, that
oil companies often rely on forecasts that un-
derestimate the pace of change.
Shell plans to green-light more than 35 new
oil and gas projects by 2025, according to an
investor presentation from June.
Oil and gas remain the backbone of profits
for Shell, the largest listed company on Lon-
don’s main FTSE index.
While oil and gas account for the entirety of
Shell’s free cash flow today, it foresees a gradu-
al diversification over the next two decades. Oil
and gas are each still expected to provide a
third of free cash flow, however, with the rest
coming from power and chemicals.
Many oil and gas projects such as gas-proc-
essing plants, deepwater platforms or chemical
plants take billions of dollars to develop and
operate for decades.
Shell, like many rivals, has become more se-
lective in its investments as the outlook for oil
prices and demand remains unclear. It targets
new projects that can be profitable at oil prices
of US$20 to US$30 a barrel and which emit rel-
atively low greenhouse emissions. Oil is trad-
ing at around US$60 a barrel.
“We can sustain an upstream portfolio all
the way into the 2030s if there is an economic
rationale for doing that and a societal rationale
for doing that,” Mr. van Beurden said.
“Fortunately enough, we have more of those
than we have money to spend on them.”
Mr. van Beurden rejected as a “red herring”
arguments that Shell’s oil and gas reserves,
which can sustain its current production for
around eight years, would be economically un-
viable, or stranded, in the future.
A lack of investment in oil and gas projects
could lead to a supply shortage
and result in price spikes, he said.
“One of the bigger risks is not
so much that we will become di-
nosaurs because we are still in-
vesting in oil and gas when there
is no need for it any more. A big-
ger risk is prematurely turning
your back on oil and gas.”
Shell plans to increase its an-
nual spending to around US$32-
billion by 2025 from the current
$25-billion, with up to one-10th
allocated to renewables and the
power business.
The company, the world’s
largest dividend payer, plans to return US$125-
billion to shareholders in the five years to 2025.
On liquefied natural gas, of which Shell is
the world’s biggest trader, Mr. van Beurden
said the market would exhibit oversupply in
the near term. “But [LNG] demand will contin-
ue to grow at a pace that is roughly four times
that of oil,” he said.
Shell has become a focal point of environ-
mental protests, particularly in Europe, with
regular demonstrations outside its London
headquarters and the British National Theatre
dropping Shell’s sponsorship in recent
months.
At the same time, investors have sharply in-
creased their scrutiny of companies’ environ-
mental performance.
Amid increasing uncertainty over future de-
mand, the share prices of Shell and its peers
have underperformed relative to other sectors.
Mr. van Beurden expressed concern that
some investors could ditch Shell, acknowledg-
ing that shares in the company were trading at
a discount partly owing to “societal risk.”
REUTERS
Oilandgastoofferopportunities
fordecadestocome,ShellCEOsays
RONBOUSSO
DMITRYZHDANNIKOVLONDON
Shellanditspeers
havelonginsisted
thatswitchingaway
fromoilandgasto
cleanersourcesof
energywilltake
decadesasdemand
fortransportand
plasticscontinues
toincrease.