The Washington Post - 05.10.2019

(Brent) #1

B2 EZ RE T H E  W A S H I N G T O N  P O S T.S A T U R D A Y, O C T O B E R  5 ,  2 0 1 9


Virginia diocese earlier this year
alleging that Bransfield sexually
assaulted him declined to com-
ment for this article. His mother
told The Post that many priests
“whom he called friends and
brothers” and many of his former
fellow seminarians for the most
part have kept their distance from
him.
“They feel they have to choose
the church,” she said. The Post
isn’t naming her to protect the
anonymity of her son. The Post
doesn’t identify sexual assault
victims without their permission.
The man and the Wheeling-
Charleston Diocese reached an
unspecified settlement over the
summer.
DeGeorge’s allegation of sexual
mistreatment by Bransfield be-
came widely known recently
when The Post reported it in a
profile of William Lori, the Balti-
more archbishop who led the in-
vestigation of Bransfield.
In a lawsuit filed Sept. 13 in
Ohio County, DeGeorge alleges
that Bransfield, the diocese and
the United States Conference of
Catholic Bishops did not rein in
someone known as a harasser,
leaving seminarians vulnerable.
Many priests and his former
classmates still avoid him — or
speak of him as a troublemaker,
DeGeorge said.
In Buffalo, the priests about
whom Parisi and Bojanowski
spoke out were suspended for a
few weeks and returned to minis-
try in June. Bishop Richard Ma-
lone issued a statement that semi-
narians who spoke out “are to be
lauded for coming forward.” Ma-
lone is accused of mishandling of
sexual abuse and misconduct cas-
es. The Vatican on Thursday an-
nounced it is investigating broad
allegations church leaders have
mishandled clergy abuse cases.
After more than 20 years serv-
ing Catholic organizations, Parisi
says he’s looking for work outside
the church.
“There needs to be major re-
form... But in my view, that
won’t happen. The system is a
very well-oiled machine,” he said.
The church hierarchy believes “it
doesn’t need fixing in their view
because it’s running exactly the
way they want it to.”
[email protected]

vast majority of seminarians —
were enrolled in programs in 2018-
2019, according to Center for Ap-
plied Research in the Apostolate.
Seventeen percent said sexual
abuse or misconduct is a problem
at their schools, the survey found.
Asked whether their administra-
tors take the issue seriously,
84 percent said “very,” while
11 percent said somewhat, a little
or not at all. Of the 10 percent who
said they have experienced, or
may have experienced, sexual ha-
rassment, abuse or misconduct,
51 percent said they had not re-
ported it. Of those who did, 42
percent said their reports were
either “completely” taken seri-
ously and acted upon or acted
upon “for the most part.”
To get the seminarians to talk,
researchers offered anonymity.
“They are afraid they’ll be
judged as temporarily unfit, too
assertive,” John Cavadini, direc-
tor of Notre Dame’s McGrath In-
stitute for Church Life, which
crafted the research, said of semi-
narians. “That’s one aspect of
seminary education you wouldn’t
have a close parallel of outside
seminary. The bishop is a peculiar
concentration of power in one
person.”
The Rev. Carter Griffin, rector
of the St. John Paul II Seminary in
the D.C. Archdiocese, said that, if
taught correctly, obedience to
church authority can be a beauti-
ful act, “to follow the Lord
through the word of another.”
But younger men who grew up
in the shadow of earlier abuse
scandals know that automatically
going “into protection mode” isn’t
wise for the church, Griffin said.
Regardless of what higher-ups do,
he said, seminarians must do
what’s right.
“It might mean that people will
misunderstand you, there may be
consequences for your actions
and you have to shoulder those,”
he said.

Shunning as punishment
Speaking out, especially for
those who do not leave seminary
or the priesthood, can be risky.
Some seminarians report a lack of
support from their classmates —
even social shunning.
An unnamed seminarian who
filed a lawsuit against the West

many questions.
An internal church report in-
vestigating allegations against
Bransfield quotes one priest-sec-
retary who was allegedly ha-
rassed as saying he was in semi-
nary when the bishop first asked
him to remove his shirt.
“He stated that he did so out of
fear. ‘Your life is at the will and
pleasure of the bishop when
you’re in seminary,’ ” the man told
the lay investigators last year,
according to the report, which
The Post obtained.
The guide for seminarians by the
United States Conference of Catho-
lic Bishops encourages submissive-
ness.
“Seminaries should articulate
that priestly obedience begins
with humble and willing coopera-
tion in seminary life, docility to
direction and wholehearted com-
pliance with the seminary’s pol-
icies,” it says.
When seminarians do speak
up, the men said church authori-
ties often do nothing.
They “say the right things, how
we encourage honesty and open-
ness, but deep down it’s clear they
want to move on from [issues] as
fast as possible,” said Mike Kelsey,
who was a seminarian in the D.C.
Archdiocese from last summer
until January when students were
openly upset that more hadn’t
been done to learn what the past
two archbishops — McCarrick
and Donald Wuerl — did and
knew regarding sexual miscon-
duct.
Kelsey and other seminarians
and priests interviewed for this
article agreed that the problem
lies in how the vows are interpret-
ed and lived out within the
church.
“I don’t think obedience is
bad,” Kelsey said, noting that cor-
porations also suffer from similar
transparency problems. “But it’s
also not something I’m signing up
for if the hierarchy behaves in this
way.... I think the church is
deeply corrupt and broken.”
Questions about how sexual
misconduct in seminary is han-
dled are considered so pressing
that the University of Notre Dame
last month released a first-of-its-
kind study of 1,500 seminarians on
the topic. About 3,500 U.S. post-
college men — who make up the

region who spoke on the condi-
tion of anonymity because he
fears dismissal.
Some said the expanding of a
more aggressive Catholic media in
the past couple of years has em-
boldened Catholics, including sem-
inarians, to challenge the hierarchy.

A power imbalance
Even as the scandals have
spurred some to speak out, church
culture and theology dissuade
more from raising their voices.
In the Catholic Church, bish-
ops are kings of their dioceses,
and priests swear an oath of loyal-
ty to them. Seminarians’ pursuit
of the priesthood rests completely
with their superiors — the bishop
in particular. There is no appeal
or required explanation if one is
deemed not to be priest material.
Some seminarians described hav-
ing their spiritual fitness for semi-
nary scrutinized if they raised too

report what he had witnessed
regardless of the consequences.
“My conscience bothered me. If
it meant being thrown out, so be
it,” said Parisi, now 45, who joined
the seminary in 2018 after 25
years as a member of a Catholic
religious order, caring for the sick
and dying.
In his Aug. 15 resignation let-
ter, Parisi urged other seminari-
ans to go to state officials or
journalists if they have similar
complaints.
Parisi said he thought he knew
the church well when he entered
seminary, but he has since come
to understand why so few raise
their voices about misconduct.
Living with his parents and
unemployed, Parisi says he has
received hate mail and that
priests in his hometown won’t
acknowledge him. His faith in the
institution has been “shattered,”
he said. “That’s what you get for
exposing the truth.”
In West Virginia, more than
half a dozen priests and former
seminarians were the key whistle-
blowers in the recent fall of Brans-
field, a well-connected fundraiser
and donator in the U.S. church.
DeGeorge is one of two seminari-
ans who have gone public with
allegations that Bransfield sexu-
ally mistreated them and have
sued. The second one, who has
not been named, said he was
assaulted.
Several current and former
clergy members spoke out begin-
ning last summer about their
treatment by defrocked cardinal
Theodore McCarrick, some by
name and others anonymously.
The Washington Post has re-
ceived more calls from Catholic
seminarians and clergy members
with tips and concerns in the past
year than in the previous decade.
“I’ve never had conversations
in all the previous years like the
ones I’ve had in the past year.
People feel they can finally talk
about things,” among themselves,
said a seminarian in the D.C.

left seminary last year.
Bransfield has denied allega-
tions of sexual misconduct.
The new pushback, according
to experts and the men them-
selves, is due to what many Catho-
lics view as the Catholic Church’s
unwillingness to respond frankly
and transparently to recently re-
vealed cases of sexual mistreat-
ment of seminarians and priests.
That, and the #MeToo moment, in
which Americans have shown
new willingness to speak out
against adult sexual abuse and
harassment.
In addition to West Virginia,
young men wrestling with scan-
dals in Buffalo and Washington,
D.C., among other places, have
also weighed expectations of obe-
dience against their desire for
more accountability and have
chosen to speak out.
Stephen Parisi, dean of his class
of seminarians in the Buffalo Dio-
cese, and Matthew Bojanowski,
who was academic chairman of
the class, made national news
recently after alleging that they
were bullied by superiors and
grilled by their academic dean
under police-like interrogation
after going public with sexual
harassment complaints about
those up the chain of command.
Parisi and another classmate
had gone to seminary officials
about a recent party in a parish
rectory. At the party in April, the
men said, priests were directing
obscene comments to the semi-
narians, discussing graphic pho-
tos and joking about professors
allegedly swapping A’s for sex.
Not long after the men spoke
up, the text from Parisi’s fellow
seminarian arrived.
“I just wanted to be sure that
you guys are protected and are
watching your backs,” the semi-
narian’s text said. Authorities are
“fishing to figure out who the
nark [sic] is.”
Parisi said he felt compelled to


SEMINARY FROM B1


RELIGION


Some seminarians are


shunned for speaking out


FRANK FRANKLIN II/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Bishop Richard Malone of Buffalo speaks during a news conference in 2018 in Cheektowaga, N.Y. Malone issued a statement that
seminarians who spoke out “are to be lauded for coming forward.” He is accused of mishandling sexual abuse and misconduct cases.

I usually
instinctively shy
away from mixing
religion with
politics or policy,
or my personal
life with my professional life. I
don’t like it when these worlds
collide, but climate change — a
central theme of my work for
over two decades — and Jewish
prayer are suddenly occupying
the same space in my mind.
A central part of the liturgy of
the Jewish High Holidays — the
New Year (Rosh Hashanah) and
its companion holiday, the Day of
Atonement (Yom Kippur) —
contains a phrase that is a
declaration and a statement of
hope: “Repentance, prayer and
charity will lessen the severity of
the decree.” It’s always struck me
that, in the season when Jews
pray for a “clean slate,” we
declare that we acknowledge our
actions can reduce only the
severity of the decree, not
eliminate it; we are essentially
plea bargaining with God and
pledging to do community
service.
The “severity of the decree”
has a particular resonance in the


climate arena and is the proper,
though unfortunate, frame for
any discussion on climate
change mitigation.
We have a small sliver of a
chance, given the small crack of a
window left open and the
absolutely expansive chasm
between us and success, to avert
most of the severity of the decree
of a warming planet. Make no
mistake, some of the warming is
already baked in, some of the
decree is already upon us, and
further severe consequences are
likely no matter what we do. But
the gates are not yet closed. If we
do not act dramatically and in
proportion to the enormous
challenge we face, the
consequences will continue to
worsen; the decree will become
increasingly severe.
Climate scientists have given
us convenient hash marks on the
global thermometer: a warming
of 1.5 degrees Celsius brings
some damage, a warming of
2 degrees brings more. If we
focus only on 1.5 or 2 degrees, it’s
a lose-lose proposition, as our
odds of holding there are not
zero but painfully low. Anyone
who tells you otherwise is a

Pollyanna. But 2.5 degrees? A
worse outcome. Four degrees?
Way worse! The severity of those
decrees are of biblical
proportions.
Will repentance, prayer and
charity work? God, no. But, if
“repentance” means assuming
personal responsibility for your
own carbon footprint and taking
actions to reduce it, such as
buying new home insulation,
getting new energy-efficient

appliances, driving less and
driving cars that produce less
emissions, then repent. If
“prayer” means imploring higher
authorities to act beneficently,
such as telling your elected
leaders — at all levels of
government — to pledge to work
toward net-zero carbon
emissions by 2050, with major
action starting immediately, then
pray. If “charity” means not just
donating to nongovernmental

organizations that work toward
reducing carbon (there are many
deserving ones!) but also being
willing to pay a little more for
zero carbon energy, then give.
Yes, of course, there are many
opportunities for economic
growth and job creation from
new technologies, but, no, clean
energy is not without cost and
not always cheaper than fossil.
Is that it? Buy a new air
conditioning unit, send an email
to your congressman and donate
to the Natural Resources Defense
Council, and you’re absolved?
Nope. One of the more famous
elements of modern Jewish
thought is the concept of “tikkun
olam,” or repairing the world.
The concept usually refers to acts
of justice, loving, kindness and
righteousness. In the context of
climate change, “world repair”
becomes quite a bit more literal.
Tikkun olam is never a one-off
but rather a long process of
continuous, concerted,
intentional action. If we are to
repair our world, we need
shepherds and flocks — leaders
who will galvanize action, and
prophets and adherents —
scientists with new research and

development, and entrepreneurs
with new businesses based on
that research and development.
We need commandments and
judges along with reward and
punishment: enforceable new
laws that penalize carbon
emissions and provide incentives
for reducing them. We need
temples: massive new
infrastructure projects that we
can be proud of and that
symbolize our new communal
and national determination. We
also need practices and ritual:
new ways of going about our
daily lives that reflect a
responsibility to reduce carbon.
To literally repair the world, and
lessen the severity of the decree,
we must use all our strength and
all our hearts.
[email protected]

Michael Leifman is the founder of
Tenley Consulting, a D.C.-based
consulting firm focused on clean
energy and technological innovation,
and the co-host of M4Edge, a podcast
on start-ups that have the potential to
change how the economy functions.
He also serves as cantor for some of
the High Holiday services at Adas
Israel Congregation in Washington.

When it comes to climate change, this Jewish liturgy takes on a new meaning


PETER SUMMERS/GETTY IMAGES
Police officers on Thursday surround a climate change activist who
tried to spray red dye on the Treasury building in London.

Perspective


MICHAEL
LEIFMAN


GOVrnNMENT oi= rni:::: DISTRICT 01= COLUMBIA


MURIEL BOWSER, MAYOR


If you're employed in the


District of Columbia


YOU MAY BE


ENTITLED TO


3,5,7


DAYS


0� PAID SICK Ll;:AVI;:.


If you have requested and been denied or retaliated against for
taking advantage of your right to paid leave under the Accrued

Sick and Safe Leave Act, contact:


D.C. Department of Employment Services Office of Wage-I-four at
(202) 671-1880 or visit http://www.does.dc.gov
** *
it,R� GOVERNMENT OF THE
E3l!E DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
0C MURIR BOWSER, MAYOR
Free download pdf