Barbara_E._Mundy]_The_Death_of_Aztec_Tenochtitlan

(vip2019) #1

224 • noTes To Pages 178–188


I thank Edward Calnek for bringing this to my
attention.



  1. Gerhard, Geografía histórica de la Nueva
    España, 22–26.

  2. Mendieta, Historia eclesiástica indiana,
    bk. 4, ch. 20, 435.

  3. Starting in the 1550s, the viceroy man-
    dated that repartimiento workers be paid a daily
    wage, but as Gibson shows, these wages were
    a fraction of those offered on the free market.
    Gibson, The Aztecs under Spanish Rule, 249–252.

  4. Gibson, The Aztecs under Spanish Rule,
    121, 123.

  5. For Otomí residence, see Vetancourt,
    Teatro mexicano, pt. 4, tratado 2, 43. Zapotec
    presence in the city may have been diffuse; they
    are discussed in Matthew D. O’Hara, A Flock
    Divided: Race, Religion, and Politics in Mexico,
    1749–1857. See also Archivo General de la
    Nación, Mexico, Indios 11, exp. 122.

  6. Ana Lorenia García, “Santa María la
    Redonda,” in Ruiz, ed., Arquitectura religiosa de
    la ciudad de México, 233.

  7. While cihuatlampa is translated as “west”
    in Alonso de Molina’s Vocabulario of 1571, the
    same source translates sur (south) into the
    Nahuatl as “cihuatlampa” and “huitztlampa.”
    That cihuatlampa could be both “south” and
    “west” signals that Nahua directions were not
    as neat as the points on the Western compass
    (east–west, that is) and that the direction of the
    setting sun, which can be to the west or toward
    the south, depending on the season, might have
    been a direction. Molina, Vocabulario.

  8. José María Marroqui, La Ciudad de
    México, contiene el origen de los nombres de
    muchas de sus calles y plazas . . . , 2:496–497.

  9. This procession was at that moment a
    loaded one, as the cabildo had implicitly sup-
    ported the overthrow of the Spanish monarchy
    in favor of local rule under Luis Cortés and
    the Ávila brothers, so their civic ritual carried
    a seditious taint. Lesley Byrd Simpson, Many
    Mexicos, 119–126. Barbara E. Mundy, “Crown and
    Tlatoque: The Iconography of Rulership in the
    Beinecke Map,” in Miller and Mundy, Painting
    a Map of Sixteenth-Century Mexico City. Ethelia
    Ruiz Medrano, “Fighting Destiny: Nahua
    Nobles and Friars in the Sixteenth-Century
    Revolt of the Encomenderos against the King,”
    in Ruiz Medrano and Kellogg, Negotiation within
    Domination, 45–77.

  10. Alonso de Montúfar, Descripción del
    arzobispado de México hecha en 1570 y otros
    documentos, ed. Luís García Pimentel, 271.

  11. Account comes from Montúfar,
    Descripción del arzobispado de México.

  12. Robert Ricard, The Spiritual Conquest
    of Mexico: An Essay on the Apostolate and
    the Evangelizing Methods of the Mendicant


Orders in New Spain, 1523–1572, trans. Lesley
Byrd Simpson, 251, puts battles on the streets
of Mexico City in the context of the larger
fight between religious and seculars. See also
Lundberg, Unification and Conflict.


  1. Bejarano, Actas de cabildo; Perla Valle,
    “La Lámina VIII del Códice de Tlatelolco. Una
    propuesta de lectura.” The discussion of the
    mitotes in the Tlatelolco Codex is adapted from
    Barbara E. Mundy, “Indigenous Dances in Early
    Colonial Mexico City,” in Donna L. Pierce, ed.,
    Festivals and Daily Life in the Arts of Colonial
    Latin America: Papers from the 2012 Mayer
    Center Symposium at the Denver Art Museum.

  2. Whittaker, “Nahuatl Hieroglyphic
    Writing and the Beinecke Map,” 138.

  3. Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 1 3 7.

  4. Noguez and Valle, Códice de Tlatelolco.

  5. Francisco Cervantes de Salazar, Crónica
    de la Nueva España, ed. Manuel Magalón, vol. 1,
    book 4, ch. 7, 315.

  6. Castañeda de la Paz, “Filología de un
    ‘corpus’ pintado,” 79.

  7. The presence of Tlacopan’s ruler at the
    jura is evidence of his loyalty to the Crown and
    was later invoked in a request to the Crown
    for exemption from tribute. Archivo General
    de las Indias, Seville, Justicia, leg. 1029, no. 10,
    discussed in Amos Megged, “Cuauhtémoc ́s
    Heirs,” 363–364. The presence of these same
    four rulers also appears in Bejarano, Actas de
    cabildo, June 4, 1557.

  8. The base element of the Tlatelolco
    Codex looks like a headpiece, and many pages
    of the Codex Mendoza show similar feathered
    ensembles as if headdresses (see for instance,
    fols. 24r, 26r, 28r, 30r, 32r, 34r, 37r, 40r, 43r, 45r,
    49r, 52r, and 54r), but fols. 23r and 65r show
    them as back elements, and the Florentine
    Codex also suggests that the quetzalpatzactli was
    worn on the back; Sahagún, Florentine Codex,
    bk. 8, ch. 12, pp. 33–35. See the recent discussion
    of the famous feather headdress of Moteuczoma
    in Sabine Haag et al., eds., El Penacho del México
    Antiguo.

  9. Durán, History, 321–322, 405–406.

  10. Karttunen, An Analytical Dictionary of
    Nahuatl, allows for i’totiliztli for “a dance,” but
    the attested forms in both Molina and Sahagún
    are another nominative form, mototiliztli. See
    Molina, Vocabulario, and R. Joe Campbell,
    Florentine Codex Vocabulary.

  11. Mendieta, Historia eclesiástica indiana,
    bk. 2, ch. 31, 140.

  12. Anderson, Bernardino de Sahagún’s
    “Psalmodia Christiana,” xvii–xxv.

  13. Motolinia, Motolinía’s History of the
    Indians of New Spain, 141.

  14. Mendieta, Historia eclesiástica indiana,
    bk. 2, ch. 32, 142–143.
    70. Miguel León Portilla, “La música en el
    universo de la cultura náhuatl.”
    71. Sahagún, Florentine Codex, bk. 9, ch. 20,
    91, 92 (quotation).
    72. Justyna Olko, Turquoise Diadems and
    Staffs of Office: Elite Costume and Insignia of
    Power in Aztec and Early Colonial Mexico.
    73. Cervantes de Salazar, Crónica de la Nueva
    España, 1:135.
    74. See Linda Ann Curcio-Nagy, The Great
    Festivals of Colonial Mexico City.
    75. Jeanette Favrot Peterson, The Paradise
    Garden Murals of Malinalco: Utopia and Empire
    in Sixteenth-Century Mexico, 93; Sahagún,
    Florentine Codex, bk. 11, ch. 7, para. 10, 208,
    and bk. 9, fol. 30v. An image of the flower, in
    bk. 9, fol. 30v, appears in the Florentine Codex
    online at http://www.wdl.org/en/item/10096
    /zoom/#group=2&page=682&zoom=1.0793
    ¢erX=0.6908¢erY=0.7468.
    76. The Anales de Juan Bautista also reports
    the use of military ware for the dances. Reyes
    García, Anales de Juan Bautista, 164–165.
    77. Durán, in his History, describes the
    elaborate feathered costumes that elite warriors
    wore into the field of battle, writing that they
    were “clothed head to foot with all the richness
    conceivable,” 184.
    78. Sahagún, Florentine Codex, bk. 9, ch. 2, 6.
    79. Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 14–15.
    80. Archivo General de la Nación, Inquisition
    303, exp. 54, describes the bishop’s banning of a
    “baile de indios” (dance of the Indians) called
    the tumteleche for its idolatrous connections.
    Anderson, Bernardino de Sahagún’s “Psalmodia
    Christiana,” xviii, summarizes ecclesiastical
    prohibitions.
    81. Gibson, The Aztecs under Spanish Rule,
    250.
    82. Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 35.
    83. Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 36.
    84. Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico,
    Indios 1, exp. 11.
    85. Castañeda de la Paz, “Sibling Maps,
    Spatial Rivalries,” 53–74.
    86. Chimalpahin, Annals of His Time, 66–67.
    87. Mendieta, Historia eclesiástica indiana,
    bk. 2, ch. 32, 141–142.
    88. Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 8 7.
    89. Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 82, names
    him as a “resident of San Juan” when he was
    alcalde in 1556.
    90. Reyes García, Anales de Juan Bautista,
    196–197.
    91. Pérez-Rocha and Tena, La nobleza
    indígena, 253–255.
    92. Arregui Zamorano, La Audiencia de
    México según los visitadores, 74–75.
    93. Mendieta, Historia eclesiástica indiana,
    bk. 4, ch. 36, 515.

Free download pdf