William_T._Bianco,_David_T._Canon]_American_Polit

(nextflipdebug2) #1
Endnotes A45

4 7. Andrew Christy, “‘Obamacare’ Will Rank among the
Longest Supreme Court Arguments Ever,” National
Public Radio, November 15, 2011, http://www.npr.org/blogs/
itsallpolitics/2011/11/15/142363047/obamacare-will-rank-
among-the-longest-supreme-court-arguments-ever (accessed
5/2/1 4).
4 8. U.S. Supreme Court, Rules of the U.S. Supreme Court,
adopted April 19, 2013, effective July 1, 2013, Rule 28.7,
http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf
(accessed 5/27/16).


  1. Savage, Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, p. 852.
    5 0. U.S. Supreme Court, Argument Transcripts, http://www.supremecourt
    .gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2017 (accessed
    6/8/18).
    5 1. Garrett Epps, “Clarence Thomas Breaks His Silence,” The
    Atlantic, February 29, 2016, http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/
    archive/2016/02/clarence-thomas-supreme-court/471582/
    (accessed 5/27/16).
    5 2. Quoted in Savage, Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, p. 854.
    5 3. Richard J. Lazarus, “Back to ‘Business’ at the Supreme Court:
    The ‘Administrative Side’ of Chief Justice Roberts,” Harvard
    Law Review Forum 129:33 (2015): 33–93.
    5 4. Michael A. McCall and Madhavi M. McCall, “Quantifying
    the Contours of Power: Chief Justice Roberts & Justice
    Kennedy in Criminal Justice Cases,” Pace Law Review 37:1
    (2016): 115–74.

  2. Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944).
    5 6. Walker and Epstein, Supreme Court, p. 110.
    5 7. Linda Greenhouse, “Chief Justice Roberts in His Own Voice:
    The Chief Justice’s Self-Assignment of Majority Opinions,”
    Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper no. 496, August 15,
    2013.

  3. Savage, Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, p. 854.
    5 9. Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner, “Are
    Even Unanimous Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
    Ideological?,” Northwestern University Law Review 106:2 (2012),
    702.
    6 0. SCOTUSblog, 2018.
    6 1. In cases involving statutory interpretation, the language of the
    law passed by Congress would be the starting point. The logic
    of these various perspectives on constitutional interpretation
    generally applies to statutory interpretation as well.
    6 2. Quoted in Lee Epstein and Thomas G. Walker, Constitutional
    Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and
    Constraints, 5th ed. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2004), p. 29.

  4. Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990).
    6 4. Epstein and Walker, Constitutional Law for a Changing
    America, p. 31.
    6 5. Seth Stern and Stephen Wermiel, Justice Brennan: Liberal
    Champion (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010).
    6 6. Epstein, Segal, Spaeth, and Walker, Supreme Court
    Compendium, Table 6-2.
    6 7. Forrest Maltzman and Paul J. Wahlbeck, “Strategic Policy
    Considerations and Vote Fluidity on the Burger Court,”
    American Journal of Political Science 90 (1996): 581–92; Forrest
    Maltzman, James F. Spriggs, and Paul J. Wahlbeck, Craf ting
    Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game (New York:
    Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 33.
    6 8. Finley Peter Dunne, Paul Green, and Jacques Barzun, Mr.
    Dooley in Peace and in War (1898; repr., Champaign-Urbana:
    University of Illinois Press, 2001).


6 9. Robert Dahl, “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme
Court as a National Policy-Maker,” Journal of Public Law 6
(1957): 279–95, is the classic work on this topic. More recent
work has challenged Dahl’s methods but largely supports the
idea that the Court follows the will of the majority.
7 0. Jeffrey A. Segal, Richard J. Timpone, and Robert M. Howard,
“Buyer Beware? Presidential Success through Supreme Court
Appointments,” Political Research Quarterly 53:3 (September
2000): 557–73; Gregory A. Caldeira and Charles E. Smith Jr.,
“Campaigning for the Supreme Court: The Dynamics of
Public Opinion on the Thomas Nomination,” Political Research
Quarterly 58:3 (August 1996): 655–81.
7 1. William Mishler and Reginald S. Sheehan, “The Supreme
Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of
Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions,” American
Political Science Review 87:1 (March 1993): 87–101.
7 2. Thomas R. Marshall, Public Opinion and the Supreme Court
(Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989), p. 12; as cited in Epstein and
Wa lker, Constitutional Law for a Changing America, p. 92.
7 3. Matthew E. K. Hall, “The Semiconstrained Court: Public
Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme
Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation,” American Journal of
Political Science 58:2 (April 2014): 352–66; Matthew E. K. Hall,
The Nature of Supreme Court Power (New York: Cambridge
University Press, 2011).

(^) 74. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989); Roper v. Simmons, 543
U.S. 551 (2005).
7 5. David O’Brien, Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American
Politics, 4th ed. (New York: W. W. Norton, 1996), p. 276.
7 6. Helmut Norpoth and Jeffrey A. Segal, “Popular Influence in
Supreme Court Decisions,” American Political Science Review
88 (1994): 711–16.
7 7. Thomas M. Keck, The Most Activist Supreme Court in History:
The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 2004).



  1. Marshall, Public Opinion, Table 6-8.
    7 9. Jeffrey Rosen, “Has the Supreme Court Gone Too Far?,”
    Commentary 116:3 (October 2003), pp. 41–2.

  2. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S.
    (2012).
    8 1. Abby Phillip, Robert Barnes, and Ed O’Keefe, “Supreme
    Court Nominee Gorsuch Says Trump’s Attacks on
    Judiciary Are ‘Demoralizing,’” Washington Post,
    February 9, 2017, http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/
    supreme-court-nominee-gorsuch-says-trumps-attacks-
    on-judiciary-are-demoralizing/2017/02/08/64e03fe2-
    ee3f-11e6-9662-6eedf1627882_story.html?utm_term=
    .ade3f9791d87 (accessed 3/15/18).
    8 2. Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. 253 (1829).

  3. Charles B. Rangel v. John A. Boehner, United States District
    Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 13-540,
    December 11, 2013, p. 48, https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/
    show_ public_doc?2013cv0540-24 (accessed 5/2/14).
    8 4. We thank Dan Smith for raising this point.


Take a Stand
a. Martin Kady, “Justice Alito Mouths ‘Not True’,”
POLITICO, January 27, 2010, http://www.politico.com/blogs/
politico-now/2010/01/justice-alito-mouthes-not-true
-024608(accessed 8/24/18).
b. Donald J. Trump, Twitter, https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/
status/828342202174668800?lang=en (accessed 3/15/18).

Full_20_APT_64431_END_A23-A54.indd 45 15/11/18 2:38 PM

Free download pdf