Michael_A._Hitt,_R._Duane_Ireland,_Robert_E._Hosk

(Kiana) #1

Chapter 10: Corporate Governance 337


An International Review, 22:116–131; V. V.
Acharya, S. C. Myers, & R. G. Rajan, 2011,
The internal governance of firms,
Journal of Finance, 66: 689–720; R. Bricker &
N. Chandar, 2000, Where Berle and Means
went wrong: A reassessment of capital
market agency and financial reporting,
Accounting, Organizations, and Society,
25: 529–554.


  1. T. M. Alessandri & A. Seth, 2014, The effects
    of managerial ownership on international
    and business diversification: Balancing
    incentives and risks, Strategic Management
    Journal, 35: 2064–2075; A. M. Colpan,
    T. Yoshikawa, T. Hikino, & E. G. Del Brio,
    2011, Shareholder heterogeneity and
    conflicting goals: Strategic investments in
    the Japanese electronics industry, Journal
    of Management Studies, 48: 591–618;
    R. M. Wiseman & L. R. Gomez-Mejia, 1999,
    A behavioral agency model of managerial
    risk taking, Academy of Management
    Review, 23: 133–153.

  2. M. Essen, M. Carney, E. R. Gedajlovic, &
    P. R. Heugens, 2015, How does family
    control influence firm strategy and
    performance? A meta-analysis of US
    publicly listed firms, Corporate Governance:
    An International Review, 23: 3–24;
    D. L. Deephouse & P. Jaskiewicz, 2013,
    Do family firms have better reputations
    than non-family firms? An integration
    of socioecomotional wealth and social
    identity theory, Journal of Management
    Studies, 50: 337–360; A. Minichilli,
    G. Corbetta, & I. C. MacMillan, 2010, Top
    management teams in family-controlled
    companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their
    impact on financial performance, Journal
    of Management Studies, 47: 205–222.

  3. D. Miller, I. Le Breton-Miller, & R. Lester,
    2013, Family firm governance, strategic
    conformity and performance: Institutional
    vs. strategic perspectives, Organization
    Science, in press; M. W. Peng & Y. Jiang,
    2010, Institutions behind family ownership
    and control in large firms, Journal of
    Management Studies, 47: 253–273.

  4. Essen, Carney, Gedajlovic, & Heugens, How
    does family control influence firm strategy
    and performance? A. meta-analysis of
    US publicly listed firms; E. Gedajlovic,
    M. Carney, J. J. Chrisman, & F. W. Kellermans,
    2012, The adolescence of family firm
    research: Taking stock and planning for
    the future, Journal of Management, 38:
    1010–1037; R. C. Anderson & D. M. Reeb,
    2004, Board composition: Balancing family
    influence in S&P 500 firms, Administrative
    Science Quarterly, 49: 209–237.

  5. Y. Cheung, I. Haw, W. Tan, & W. Wang, 2014,
    Board Structure and intragroup propping:
    Evidence from family business groups in
    Hong Kong. Financial Management, 43:
    569–601; E. Lutz & S. Schrami, 2012, Family
    firms: Should they hire an outside CFO?
    Journal of Business Strategy, 33(1): 39–44;
    E.-T. Chen & J. Nowland, 2010, Optimal


board monitoring in family-owned
companies: Evidence from Asia, Corporate
Governance: An International Review, 18:
3–17.


  1. J. L. Arregle, L. Naldi, M. Nordquvist, & M.
    A. Hitt, 2012, Internationalization of family
    controlled firm: A study of the effects
    of external involvement in governance,
    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
    36: 1115–1143; D. G. Sirmon, J.-L. Arregle,
    M. A. Hitt, & J. W. Webb, 2008, Strategic
    responses to the threat of imitation,
    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32:
    979–998.

  2. R. M. Wiseman, G. Cuevas-Rodriguez, &
    L. R. Gomez-Mejia, 2012, Towards a social
    theory of agency, Journal of Management
    Studies, 49: 202–222; G. Dushnitsky &
    Z. Shapira, 2010, Entrepreneurial finance
    meets organizational reality: Comparing
    investment practices and performance
    of corporate and independent venture
    capitalists, Strategic Management Journal,
    31: 990–1017.

  3. A. K. Hoenen & T. Kostova, 2014, Utilizing
    the broader agency perspective for
    studying headquarters-subsidiary relations
    in multinational companies, Journal of
    International Business Studies, 46: 104–113;
    T. J. Quigley & D. C. Hambrick, 2012, When
    the former CEO stays on as board chair:
    Effects on successor discretion, strategic
    change and performance, Strategic
    Management Journal, 33: 834–859.

  4. R. Krause, M. Semadeni, & A. A. Cannella,
    2013, External COO/presidents as expert
    directors: A new look at the service role
    of boards, Strategic Management Journal,
    34: 1628–1641; A. Mackey, 2008, The effects
    of CEOs on firm performance, Strategic
    Management Journal, 29: 1357–1367.

  5. W. Li & Y. Lu, 2012, CEO dismissal,
    institutional development and
    environmental dynamism, Asia Pacific
    Journal of Management, 29: 1007–1026;
    L. L. Lan & L. Heracleous, 2010, Rethinking
    agency theory: The view from law,
    Academy of Management Review, 35:
    294–314; Dalton, Hitt, Certo, & Dalton, 2008,
    The fundamental agency problem and its
    mitigation: Independence, equity and the
    market for corporate control.

  6. B. Kang & R. P Jindal, 2015, Opportunism
    in buyer-seller relationships: Some
    unexplored antecedents, Journal of
    Business Research, 68: 735–742; K. Vafai,
    2010, Opportunism in organizations,
    Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
    26: 158–181; O. E. Williamson, 1996, The
    Mechanisms of Governance, NY: Oxford
    University Press, 6.

  7. Y. Luo, Y. Liu, Q. Yang, V. Maksimov, & J. Hou,
    2015, Improving performance and reducing
    cost in buyer-supplier relationships: The
    role of justice in curtailing opportunism,
    Journal of Business Research, 68: 607–615;
    F. Lumineau & D. Malhotra, 2011, Shadow
    of the contract: How contract structure


shapes interfirm dispute resolution,
Strategic Management Journal, 32: 532–555.


  1. B. Balsmeier, A. Buchwald, & J. Stiebale,
    2014, Outside directors on the board and
    innovative firm performance, Research
    Policy, 43: 1800–1815; M. L. McDonald,
    P. Khanna, & J. D. Westphal, 2008, Getting
    them to think outside the circle: Corporate
    governance CEOs’ external advice networks,
    and firm performance, Academy of
    Management Journal, 51: 453–475.

  2. Y. Ning, X. Hu, & X. Garza-Gomez, 2015, An
    empirical analysis of the impact of large
    changes in institutional ownership on CEO
    compensation risk, Journal of Economics &
    Finance, 39: 23–47; J. Harris, S. Johnson, &
    D. Souder, 2013, Model theoretic
    knowledge accumulation: The case of
    agency theory and incentive alignment,
    Academy of Management Review, 38: 442–454;
    L. Weber & K. J. Mayer, 2011, Designing
    effective contracts: Exploring the influence
    of framing and expectations, Academy of
    Management Review, 36: 53–75.

  3. T. J. Boulton, M. V. Braga-Alves, &
    F. P. Schlingemann, 2014, Does equity-
    based compensation make CEOs more
    acquisitive?, Journal of Financial Research,
    37: 267–294; T. Hutzschenreuter &
    J. Horstkotte, 2013, Performance effects
    of top management team demographic
    faultlines in the process of product
    diversification, Strategic Management
    Journal, 34: 704–726; E. Levitas, V. L.
    Barker, III, & M. Ahsan, 2011, Top manager
    ownership levels and incentive alignment
    in inventively active firms, Journal of
    Strategy and Management, 4: 116–135.

  4. D. E. Black, S. S. Dikolli, & S. D. Dyreng, 2014,
    CEO pay-for-complexity and the risk of
    managerial diversion from multinational
    diversification, Contemporary Accounting
    Research, 31: 103–135 P. David, J. P. O’Brien,
    T. Yoshikawa, &. A. Delios, 2010, Do
    shareholders or stakeholders appropriate
    the rents from corporate diversification?
    The influence of ownership structure,
    Academy of Management Journal, 53:
    636–654; G. P. Baker & B. J. Hall, 2004, CEO
    incentives and firm size, Journal of Labor
    Economics, 22: 767–798.

  5. A. S. Hornstein & Z. Nguyen, 2014, Is more
    less? Propensity to diversify via M&A and
    market reaction, International Review of
    Financial Analysis, 34: 76–88; S. W. Geiger &
    L. H. Cashen, 2007, Organizational size
    and CEO compensation: The moderating
    effect of diversification in downscoping
    organizations, Journal of Managerial Issues,
    9: 233–252.

  6. B. W. Benson, J. C. Park, & W. N. Davidson,
    2014, Equity-based incentives, risk
    aversion, and merger-related risk-taking
    behavior, Financial Review, 49: 117–148;
    M. Larraza-Kintana, L. R. Gomez-Mejia, &
    R. M. Wiseman, 2011, Compensation
    framing and the risk-taking behavior of the
    CEO: Testing the influence of alternative

Free download pdf